On with critique! The necessity of critique in addressing the political deficits of responsible innovation

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2024.2319809

Lisann Penttilä

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article responds to the calls to address the political deficits of RI frameworks and uptakes by taking recourse to approaches inspired by the methods and emancipatory ambitions of critical the...

查看原文本刊更多论文

继续批判！批判在解决负责任创新的政治缺陷方面的必要性

这篇文章响应了解决成果转化框架和吸收的政治缺陷的呼吁，采用了受批判性研究方法和解放雄心启发的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.