Assessment of suicidality in trials of psychological interventions for depression: a meta-analysis.

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lancet Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00027-0
Clara Miguel, Jessica Cecconi, Mathias Harrer, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Shalini Bhattacharya, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers, Claudio Gentili, Ioana A Cristea
{"title":"Assessment of suicidality in trials of psychological interventions for depression: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Clara Miguel, Jessica Cecconi, Mathias Harrer, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Shalini Bhattacharya, Eirini Karyotaki, Pim Cuijpers, Claudio Gentili, Ioana A Cristea","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00027-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological interventions that are efficacious as treatments for depression could indirectly affect suicide-related outcomes. We examined suicidal thoughts and behaviours as eligibility criteria, outcomes, and adverse events across trials of psychotherapy for depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a publicly available meta-analytic database developed through systematic searches (updated as of May 1, 2023) to identify randomised controlled trials in which a psychological intervention for depression was compared with an inactive or non-specific control condition in adults with depression and in which any suicide-related outcomes were reported. We also identified studies in which suicide risk was an exclusion criterion. We excluded inpatient studies and trials of unguided digital interventions or collaborative care that included a psychological component. Pairs of reviewers worked independently to select studies and extract data. In a random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation, we assessed the effect of the psychological intervention on suicide outcomes in trials in which suicide was explicitly assessed as an outcome with clinical scales with established psychometric properties. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 469 randomised trials we identified in which a psychological intervention was compared with an inactive control in people with depression, 251 excluded people judged at risk of suicide. Any assessment of suicide was included in only 45 trials, 12 of which assessed suicidal ideation or risk as an outcome. These 12 trials included 3930 participants, 2795 (71%) of whom were female and 1135 (29%) of whom were male; data for age and ethnicity were not consistently reported. Psychological interventions for depression were associated with a small reduction in suicidal ideation and risk in 11 trials (one trial reported only follow-up data) after the intervention (standardised mean difference -0·31 [95% CI -0·60 to -0·03]) but not at follow-up (-0·49 [-1·31 to 0·32]). Suicide-related adverse events were reported in 25 trials, and suicide-related serious adverse events (eg, suicide attempts, deaths by suicide) were reported in 13 trials. Heterogeneity was substantial across all analyses, and prediction intervals crossed zero.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Trials of psychological interventions for depression rarely report assessments of suicide. Psychological interventions might reduce suicidal ideation in patients with depression, but more randomised controlled trials are required to clarify this effect. Monitoring and reporting of suicide-related adverse events should be improved in trials of psychological interventions for depression, and future trials should incorporate outcomes related to suicidal thoughts or behaviours.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00027-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological interventions that are efficacious as treatments for depression could indirectly affect suicide-related outcomes. We examined suicidal thoughts and behaviours as eligibility criteria, outcomes, and adverse events across trials of psychotherapy for depression.

Methods: We used a publicly available meta-analytic database developed through systematic searches (updated as of May 1, 2023) to identify randomised controlled trials in which a psychological intervention for depression was compared with an inactive or non-specific control condition in adults with depression and in which any suicide-related outcomes were reported. We also identified studies in which suicide risk was an exclusion criterion. We excluded inpatient studies and trials of unguided digital interventions or collaborative care that included a psychological component. Pairs of reviewers worked independently to select studies and extract data. In a random-effects meta-analysis with robust variance estimation, we assessed the effect of the psychological intervention on suicide outcomes in trials in which suicide was explicitly assessed as an outcome with clinical scales with established psychometric properties. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2).

Findings: Of the 469 randomised trials we identified in which a psychological intervention was compared with an inactive control in people with depression, 251 excluded people judged at risk of suicide. Any assessment of suicide was included in only 45 trials, 12 of which assessed suicidal ideation or risk as an outcome. These 12 trials included 3930 participants, 2795 (71%) of whom were female and 1135 (29%) of whom were male; data for age and ethnicity were not consistently reported. Psychological interventions for depression were associated with a small reduction in suicidal ideation and risk in 11 trials (one trial reported only follow-up data) after the intervention (standardised mean difference -0·31 [95% CI -0·60 to -0·03]) but not at follow-up (-0·49 [-1·31 to 0·32]). Suicide-related adverse events were reported in 25 trials, and suicide-related serious adverse events (eg, suicide attempts, deaths by suicide) were reported in 13 trials. Heterogeneity was substantial across all analyses, and prediction intervals crossed zero.

Interpretation: Trials of psychological interventions for depression rarely report assessments of suicide. Psychological interventions might reduce suicidal ideation in patients with depression, but more randomised controlled trials are required to clarify this effect. Monitoring and reporting of suicide-related adverse events should be improved in trials of psychological interventions for depression, and future trials should incorporate outcomes related to suicidal thoughts or behaviours.

Funding: None.

Translation: For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

抑郁症心理干预试验中的自杀性评估:荟萃分析。
背景:对抑郁症有疗效的心理干预可能会间接影响自杀相关的结果。我们研究了抑郁症心理治疗试验中作为资格标准的自杀想法和行为、结果以及不良事件:我们使用了一个通过系统性检索(更新至 2023 年 5 月 1 日)开发的可公开获取的荟萃分析数据库,以确定在成人抑郁症患者中将抑郁症心理干预与非活动或非特异性对照条件进行比较的随机对照试验,其中报告了任何与自杀相关的结果。我们还确定了将自杀风险作为排除标准的研究。我们排除了住院病人研究、无指导的数字化干预试验或包含心理成分的合作护理试验。两对审稿人独立工作,选择研究并提取数据。在采用稳健方差估算的随机效应荟萃分析中,我们评估了心理干预对自杀结果的影响,在这些试验中,自杀被明确评估为一种结果,并使用了具有可靠心理测量特性的临床量表。偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(第 2 版)进行评估:在我们确定的 469 项随机试验中,对抑郁症患者的心理干预与非活动对照进行了比较,其中 251 项试验排除了被判定有自杀风险的患者。只有45项试验对自杀进行了评估,其中12项试验将自杀意念或自杀风险作为评估结果。这12项试验共纳入3930名参与者,其中2795人(71%)为女性,1135人(29%)为男性;有关年龄和种族的数据报告并不一致。在11项试验(一项试验仅报告了随访数据)中,抑郁症心理干预与干预后自杀意念和自杀风险的小幅降低有关(标准化平均差为-0-31 [95% CI -0-60 to -0-03]),但与随访时的情况无关(-0-49 [-1-31 to 0-32])。25项试验报告了与自杀相关的不良事件,13项试验报告了与自杀相关的严重不良事件(如自杀未遂、自杀死亡)。在所有分析中,异质性都很严重,预测区间均为零:抑郁症心理干预试验很少报告自杀评估。心理干预可能会减少抑郁症患者的自杀意念,但需要更多的随机对照试验来明确这种效果。在抑郁症心理干预试验中,应加强对自杀相关不良事件的监测和报告,未来的试验应纳入与自杀想法或行为相关的结果:无:摘要的西班牙文译文见 "补充材料 "部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信