Viabahn stent graft for arterial injury management: safety, technical success, and long-term outcome.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jan M Brendel, Tobias Mangold, Mario Lescan, Jörg Schmehl, Patrick Ghibes, Antonia Grimm, Simon Greulich, Patrick Krumm, Christoph Artzner, Gerd Grözinger, Arne Estler
{"title":"Viabahn stent graft for arterial injury management: safety, technical success, and long-term outcome.","authors":"Jan M Brendel, Tobias Mangold, Mario Lescan, Jörg Schmehl, Patrick Ghibes, Antonia Grimm, Simon Greulich, Patrick Krumm, Christoph Artzner, Gerd Grözinger, Arne Estler","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00435-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Viabahn stent graft has emerged as an integral tool for managing vascular diseases, but there is limited long-term data on its performance in emergency endovascular treatment. This study aimed to assess safety, technical success, and long-term efficacy of the Viabahn stent graft in emergency treatment of arterial injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single tertiary centre analysis of patients who underwent Viabahn emergency arterial injury treatment between 2015 and 2020. Indication, intraoperative complications, technical and clinical success, and major adverse events at 30 days were evaluated. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the primary and secondary patency rates assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients (71 ± 13 years, 19 women) were analyzed. Indications for Viabahn emergency treatment were extravasation (65.0%), arterio-venous fistula (22.5%), pseudoaneurysm (10.0%), and arterio-ureteral fistula (2.5%). No intraoperative adverse events occurred, technical and clinical success rates were 100%. One acute stent graft occlusion occurred in the popliteal artery on day 9, resulting in a 30-day device-related major-adverse-event rate of 2.5%. Median follow-up was 402 days [IQR, 43-1093]. Primary patency rate was 97% (95% CI: 94-100) in year 1, and 92% (95% CI: 86-98) from years 2 to 6. One stent graft occlusion occurred in the external iliac artery at 18 months; successful revascularization resulted in secondary patency rates of 97% (95% CI: 94-100) from years 1 to 6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using Viabahn stent graft in emergency arterial injury treatment had 100% technical and clinical success rates, a low 30-day major-adverse-event rate of 2.5%, and excellent long-term patency rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00435-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Viabahn stent graft has emerged as an integral tool for managing vascular diseases, but there is limited long-term data on its performance in emergency endovascular treatment. This study aimed to assess safety, technical success, and long-term efficacy of the Viabahn stent graft in emergency treatment of arterial injury.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single tertiary centre analysis of patients who underwent Viabahn emergency arterial injury treatment between 2015 and 2020. Indication, intraoperative complications, technical and clinical success, and major adverse events at 30 days were evaluated. Secondary efficacy endpoints were the primary and secondary patency rates assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Forty patients (71 ± 13 years, 19 women) were analyzed. Indications for Viabahn emergency treatment were extravasation (65.0%), arterio-venous fistula (22.5%), pseudoaneurysm (10.0%), and arterio-ureteral fistula (2.5%). No intraoperative adverse events occurred, technical and clinical success rates were 100%. One acute stent graft occlusion occurred in the popliteal artery on day 9, resulting in a 30-day device-related major-adverse-event rate of 2.5%. Median follow-up was 402 days [IQR, 43-1093]. Primary patency rate was 97% (95% CI: 94-100) in year 1, and 92% (95% CI: 86-98) from years 2 to 6. One stent graft occlusion occurred in the external iliac artery at 18 months; successful revascularization resulted in secondary patency rates of 97% (95% CI: 94-100) from years 1 to 6.

Conclusion: Using Viabahn stent graft in emergency arterial injury treatment had 100% technical and clinical success rates, a low 30-day major-adverse-event rate of 2.5%, and excellent long-term patency rates.

用于动脉损伤治疗的 Viabahn 支架移植:安全性、技术成功率和长期疗效。
背景:Viabahn支架移植物已成为治疗血管疾病的重要工具,但有关其在紧急血管内治疗中表现的长期数据却很有限。本研究旨在评估 Viabahn 支架移植物在动脉损伤急诊治疗中的安全性、技术成功率和长期疗效:我们对 2015 年至 2020 年期间接受 Viabahn 紧急动脉损伤治疗的患者进行了一项单一三级中心回顾性分析。对适应症、术中并发症、技术和临床成功率以及 30 天内的主要不良事件进行了评估。次要疗效终点是通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估的主要和次要通畅率:分析了 40 名患者(71 ± 13 岁,19 名女性)。Viabahn 紧急治疗的适应症为外渗(65.0%)、动静脉瘘(22.5%)、假性动脉瘤(10.0%)和动静脉输尿管瘘(2.5%)。无术中不良事件发生,技术和临床成功率均为100%。第9天,腘动脉发生了一起急性支架移植物闭塞,导致30天内与设备相关的重大不良事件发生率为2.5%。中位随访时间为 402 天[IQR,43-1093]。第 1 年的初次通畅率为 97%(95% CI:94-100),第 2 年至第 6 年的初次通畅率为 92%(95% CI:86-98)。18个月时,髂外动脉发生了一次支架移植物闭塞;成功的血管再通后,第1至6年的二次通畅率为97%(95% CI:94-100):结论:在急诊动脉损伤治疗中使用 Viabahn 支架移植物,技术和临床成功率均为 100%,30 天内重大不良事件发生率低至 2.5%,长期通畅率极佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信