Histogram Feature Analysis of Tumor Body on Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Differentiation between Granulosa Cell Tumors and Other Sex-cord Tumors in Ovary: Comparison with Histological Results.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Minjie Wu, Tianping Wang, Feiran Zhang, Yida Wang, Guofu Zhang, Minhua Shen, He Zhang
{"title":"Histogram Feature Analysis of Tumor Body on Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Differentiation between Granulosa Cell Tumors and Other Sex-cord Tumors in Ovary: Comparison with Histological Results.","authors":"Minjie Wu, Tianping Wang, Feiran Zhang, Yida Wang, Guofu Zhang, Minhua Shen, He Zhang","doi":"10.2174/0115734056269130240117071800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to differentiate granulosa cell tumors (GCT) from other ovarian sex-cord tumors (OSCs) based on feature analysis of the tumor body on MR imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 27 patients with pathologically proven sex-cord tumours (14 GSTs, 8 fibromas, 4 fibrothecomas, and 1 sclerosing stromal tumour) from our institution. All MRI examinations were performed at least one month prior to surgery. MR image features were recorded by two radiologists with consensus readings. Histogram analysis was performed using FeAture Explorer software. The differences in histogram parameters between GCT (38.1 ± 14.6 years) and OSC (43.7 ± 18.0 years) groups were compared. Fourteen randomly selected cellular-type myomas who also underwent MRI in our hospital were considered as the control group. The intra-operator consistency of ADC value was evaluated across measurements twice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The repeatability of conventional ADC measurements on the tumor body was good. The values of ADC-mean, ADC-min, and ADC-max significantly differed across three groups (p < 0.001). The histogram variance on DWI, histogram percentage on T2WI, and ADC min showed the best discriminative performance in determining GCTs from other OSCs with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.997, 0.882, and 0.795, respectively. The histogram variance on DWI yielded a sensitivity of 92.3%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 96.6% in discriminating GSTs from other OSCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, feature analysis of tumor body MR imaging has helped to differentiate GST from OSC with better performance than conventional ADC measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056269130240117071800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to differentiate granulosa cell tumors (GCT) from other ovarian sex-cord tumors (OSCs) based on feature analysis of the tumor body on MR imaging.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 27 patients with pathologically proven sex-cord tumours (14 GSTs, 8 fibromas, 4 fibrothecomas, and 1 sclerosing stromal tumour) from our institution. All MRI examinations were performed at least one month prior to surgery. MR image features were recorded by two radiologists with consensus readings. Histogram analysis was performed using FeAture Explorer software. The differences in histogram parameters between GCT (38.1 ± 14.6 years) and OSC (43.7 ± 18.0 years) groups were compared. Fourteen randomly selected cellular-type myomas who also underwent MRI in our hospital were considered as the control group. The intra-operator consistency of ADC value was evaluated across measurements twice.

Results: The repeatability of conventional ADC measurements on the tumor body was good. The values of ADC-mean, ADC-min, and ADC-max significantly differed across three groups (p < 0.001). The histogram variance on DWI, histogram percentage on T2WI, and ADC min showed the best discriminative performance in determining GCTs from other OSCs with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.997, 0.882, and 0.795, respectively. The histogram variance on DWI yielded a sensitivity of 92.3%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 96.6% in discriminating GSTs from other OSCs.

Conclusion: In the present study, feature analysis of tumor body MR imaging has helped to differentiate GST from OSC with better performance than conventional ADC measurements.

弥散加权磁共振成像瘤体直方图特征分析在区分卵巢颗粒细胞瘤和其他性索肿瘤中的应用:与组织学结果的比较
目的我们的目的是根据磁共振成像对肿瘤体的特征分析,区分颗粒细胞瘤(GCT)和其他卵巢性索肿瘤(OSCs):我们回顾性地纳入了本院27例经病理证实的性索肿瘤患者(14例GST、8例纤维瘤、4例纤维肉瘤和1例硬化性间质瘤)。所有磁共振成像检查均在手术前至少一个月进行。核磁共振图像特征由两名放射科医生共同记录。使用 FeAture Explorer 软件进行直方图分析。比较了 GCT 组(38.1 ± 14.6 岁)和 OSC 组(43.7 ± 18.0 岁)的直方图参数差异。对照组为随机抽取的 14 个细胞型肌瘤,这些肌瘤也在本院接受了核磁共振成像检查。对两次测量中 ADC 值的术者内一致性进行评估:结果:肿瘤体常规 ADC 测量的重复性良好。三组的 ADC-mean、ADC-min 和 ADC-max 值差异显著(P < 0.001)。DWI 上的直方图方差、T2WI 上的直方图百分比和 ADC min 在判定 GCT 和其他 OSC 方面显示出最佳的鉴别性能,接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.997、0.882 和 0.795。DWI 的直方图方差在区分 GST 和其他 OSC 方面的灵敏度为 92.3%,特异度为 100%,准确度为 96.6%:在本研究中,肿瘤体磁共振成像的特征分析有助于区分 GST 和 OSC,其效果优于传统的 ADC 测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信