Rationale and Trial Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to assess the Impact of a Concomitant Crural Repair during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction without Frank Hiatal Hernia (REPAIR trial protocol).

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Koy Min Chue, Bin Chet Toh, Lester Wei Lin Ong, Gamage Manisha Kariyawasam, Wai Keong Wong, Chin Hong Lim, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan, Baldwin Po Man Yeung
{"title":"Rationale and Trial Protocol for a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to assess the Impact of a Concomitant Crural Repair during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with a Lax Gastroesophageal Junction without Frank Hiatal Hernia (REPAIR trial protocol).","authors":"Koy Min Chue, Bin Chet Toh, Lester Wei Lin Ong, Gamage Manisha Kariyawasam, Wai Keong Wong, Chin Hong Lim, Jeremy Tian Hui Tan, Baldwin Po Man Yeung","doi":"10.1159/000538043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE). The role of crural repair during LSG is still controversial. The preoperative laxity of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), graded by the Hill's classification, is more predictive for postoperative GERD and EE after LSG than the presence of a hiatal hernia seen on endoscopy. Thus, the authors hypothesize that a concomitant crural repair in a specific subgroup of patients with a lax GEJ (Hill's III) may reduce the incidence of postoperative GERD and EE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of patients with Hill's III GEJ undergoing LSG will be randomized to a concomitant crural repair (experimental) versus LSG alone (control). Primary outcome measures will be presence of EE at 1-year. Secondary outcome measures will include proton pump inhibitor use, postoperative complications, operative time, blood loss, quality of life, GERD and gastrointestinal symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conflicting crural repair results may be explained by differences in preoperative GEJ laxity. Patients with a frank hiatal hernia and patulous GEJ (Hill's IV) have a very high, while patients with an apposed GEJ (Hill's I, Hill's II) have a low incidence of postoperative GERD and EE respectively. Thus, the authors hypothesize that patients with a lax GEJ without frank hiatal hernia (Hill's III), might benefit from a crural repair. This study results can potentially highlight the clinical importance of preoperative endoscopic evaluation of the GEJ in all patients planned for LSG, to determine which subgroup patients may benefit from a crural repair. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05330910, Registered 15-April-2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE). The role of crural repair during LSG is still controversial. The preoperative laxity of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), graded by the Hill's classification, is more predictive for postoperative GERD and EE after LSG than the presence of a hiatal hernia seen on endoscopy. Thus, the authors hypothesize that a concomitant crural repair in a specific subgroup of patients with a lax GEJ (Hill's III) may reduce the incidence of postoperative GERD and EE.

Methods: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of patients with Hill's III GEJ undergoing LSG will be randomized to a concomitant crural repair (experimental) versus LSG alone (control). Primary outcome measures will be presence of EE at 1-year. Secondary outcome measures will include proton pump inhibitor use, postoperative complications, operative time, blood loss, quality of life, GERD and gastrointestinal symptoms.

Conclusion: Conflicting crural repair results may be explained by differences in preoperative GEJ laxity. Patients with a frank hiatal hernia and patulous GEJ (Hill's IV) have a very high, while patients with an apposed GEJ (Hill's I, Hill's II) have a low incidence of postoperative GERD and EE respectively. Thus, the authors hypothesize that patients with a lax GEJ without frank hiatal hernia (Hill's III), might benefit from a crural repair. This study results can potentially highlight the clinical importance of preoperative endoscopic evaluation of the GEJ in all patients planned for LSG, to determine which subgroup patients may benefit from a crural repair. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05330910, Registered 15-April-2022).

评估腹腔镜袖状胃切除术期间同时进行皱壁修补术对胃食管交界处松弛且无弗兰克裂孔疝患者的影响的双盲随机对照试验的原理和试验方案(REPAIR 试验方案)。
简介:腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)与术后胃食管反流病(GERD)和侵蚀性食管炎(EE)有关。在 LSG 过程中进行嵴修复的作用仍存在争议。根据希尔分类法分级的术前胃食管交界处(GEJ)松弛度比内窥镜检查中发现的食管裂孔疝更能预测 LSG 术后胃食管反流病和 EE 的发生。因此,作者假设在胃食管返流松弛(Hill's III)的特定亚组患者中同时进行嵴修补术可能会降低术后胃食管反流和 EE 的发生率:双盲随机对照试验将对接受 LSG 手术的 Hill's III GEJ 患者进行随机分组,分为同时进行嵴膜修补术(实验组)和单独进行 LSG 手术(对照组)。主要结果指标为 1 年后是否出现 EE。次要结果指标包括质子泵抑制剂的使用、术后并发症、手术时间、失血量、生活质量、胃食管反流病和胃肠道症状:结论:相互矛盾的嵴状修复结果可能是由术前胃食管颈松弛程度的差异造成的。食管裂孔疝和胃食管松弛的患者(Hill's IV)术后胃食管反流和 EE 的发生率非常高,而胃食管贴壁的患者(Hill's I、Hill's II)术后胃食管反流和 EE 的发生率较低。因此,作者推测,胃食管连接松弛而无食管裂孔疝(希尔氏 III 型)的患者可能会从嵴修补术中获益。这项研究结果可能会凸显对所有计划进行LSG手术的患者进行术前GEJ内镜评估的临床重要性,以确定哪些亚组患者可能会从嵴修补术中获益。(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05330910,注册日期:2022年4月15日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信