Farmers Perspectives on Negative Impacts of Chemical Pesticide Usage in Vegetable Cultivations: Case Study from the Periyaneelavanai Area, Ampara District

Tharangani P.K.S.J., Sanjula K.R., Sahr A.K.S., Rushdha M.J., Bandara W.A.R.T.W.
{"title":"Farmers Perspectives on Negative Impacts of Chemical Pesticide Usage in Vegetable Cultivations: Case Study from the Periyaneelavanai Area, Ampara District","authors":"Tharangani P.K.S.J., Sanjula K.R., Sahr A.K.S., Rushdha M.J., Bandara W.A.R.T.W.","doi":"10.31357/fesympo.v27.7030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indiscriminate use of pesticides causes health hazards to humans and long-lasting negative impacts to the environment. The major objectives of this study are to evaluate the current status of pesticide usage in the Periyaneelavani area, to evaluate farmers‘ perception on health, environmental effects due to usage, of pesticides, to identify the awareness level of farmers about proper usage of chemical pesticides and alternatives. This study was carried out in two GN divisions of Periyaneelavanai area, Ampara district. To represent 20% respondents, 50 farmers from each GN devisions which upto total 100 were randomly surveyed using a structured questionnaire. In order to gather the necessary data on vegetable cultivation, a preliminary study involving interviews with the Agricultural Instructor-Officer in Charge and affiliated farmers in Periyaneelavanai area were conducted before the actual survey. Discriptive analysis, P test, T test, anova were performed using minitab 14.0 version to conduct data analysis. The present study revealed that Chili, Brinjal, Okra, Tomato, Long beans, Cucurbites, Onion and Leafy vegetables were primarily grown in this area. Abamactin, Coragan, Applaud and Virtako were used as insecticides and Abamactin was the most popular (42%) among farmers. Mancozeb, Propineb and Canazole were used as fungicides and the highest usage was Mancozeb (45%). Mortin rat kill was used as a rodenticide by all the respondent farmers, and they have not used herbicides for their vegetable cultivation; instead, they manually remove the weeds. Skin irritation was the most prominent (60%), acute disease, and Asthma was the most common chronic disease (31%), that can be seen among farmers. The most common adverse environmental impact in this area was the empty pesticide containers piling up along roadsides (95%). All the farmers use at least one PPE while applying pesticide though the frequency of wearing PPE is different among each other. The majority of respondents use gloves, eye protection, and foot ware but lack of awareness towards face, head and body protection. The highest number of farmers selected indoor places (51%) for pesticide storage which cause to have a high risk of exposure among farmers. Most of the farmers selected the option of burying or burning pesticide bottles after using it. Majority of respondents preferred to use chemical pesticides (76%), rather than alternative methods due to the reliability of those methods. It is proposed to educate farmers on application, storage, cleaning and carrying the pesticides, the methods of effectiveness of different individual protection facilities, and utilizing the behavior to reduce the exposure to poisons should be developed and be available to farmers. This will help to reduce negative health and environmental consequences. Moreover, it is recommended to introduce reliable and effective alternative methods for chemical pesticides. \nKeywords: Periyaneelavanai area, Vegetable cultivation, Pesticides, Environmental impacts, Disease","PeriodicalId":205644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/fesympo.v27.7030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indiscriminate use of pesticides causes health hazards to humans and long-lasting negative impacts to the environment. The major objectives of this study are to evaluate the current status of pesticide usage in the Periyaneelavani area, to evaluate farmers‘ perception on health, environmental effects due to usage, of pesticides, to identify the awareness level of farmers about proper usage of chemical pesticides and alternatives. This study was carried out in two GN divisions of Periyaneelavanai area, Ampara district. To represent 20% respondents, 50 farmers from each GN devisions which upto total 100 were randomly surveyed using a structured questionnaire. In order to gather the necessary data on vegetable cultivation, a preliminary study involving interviews with the Agricultural Instructor-Officer in Charge and affiliated farmers in Periyaneelavanai area were conducted before the actual survey. Discriptive analysis, P test, T test, anova were performed using minitab 14.0 version to conduct data analysis. The present study revealed that Chili, Brinjal, Okra, Tomato, Long beans, Cucurbites, Onion and Leafy vegetables were primarily grown in this area. Abamactin, Coragan, Applaud and Virtako were used as insecticides and Abamactin was the most popular (42%) among farmers. Mancozeb, Propineb and Canazole were used as fungicides and the highest usage was Mancozeb (45%). Mortin rat kill was used as a rodenticide by all the respondent farmers, and they have not used herbicides for their vegetable cultivation; instead, they manually remove the weeds. Skin irritation was the most prominent (60%), acute disease, and Asthma was the most common chronic disease (31%), that can be seen among farmers. The most common adverse environmental impact in this area was the empty pesticide containers piling up along roadsides (95%). All the farmers use at least one PPE while applying pesticide though the frequency of wearing PPE is different among each other. The majority of respondents use gloves, eye protection, and foot ware but lack of awareness towards face, head and body protection. The highest number of farmers selected indoor places (51%) for pesticide storage which cause to have a high risk of exposure among farmers. Most of the farmers selected the option of burying or burning pesticide bottles after using it. Majority of respondents preferred to use chemical pesticides (76%), rather than alternative methods due to the reliability of those methods. It is proposed to educate farmers on application, storage, cleaning and carrying the pesticides, the methods of effectiveness of different individual protection facilities, and utilizing the behavior to reduce the exposure to poisons should be developed and be available to farmers. This will help to reduce negative health and environmental consequences. Moreover, it is recommended to introduce reliable and effective alternative methods for chemical pesticides. Keywords: Periyaneelavanai area, Vegetable cultivation, Pesticides, Environmental impacts, Disease
农民对蔬菜种植中使用化学农药负面影响的看法:安帕赖区 Periyaneelavanai 地区的案例研究
滥用杀虫剂会对人类健康造成危害,并对环境产生长期的负面影响。本研究的主要目的是评估 Periyaneelavani 地区的杀虫剂使用现状,评估农民对使用杀虫剂造成的健康和环境影响的看法,确定农民对正确使用化学杀虫剂和替代品的认识水平。这项研究在安帕赖区 Periyaneelavanai 地区的两个 GN 分区进行。为了代表 20% 的受访者,使用结构化问卷对每个 GN 分部的 50 名农民(共计 100 名)进行了随机调查。为了收集有关蔬菜种植的必要数据,在实际调查之前进行了一项初步研究,包括与 Periyaneelavanai 地区的农业指导员-主管官员和附属农民进行访谈。使用 minitab 14.0 版本进行了描述性分析、P 检验、T 检验和 anova 分析。本研究显示,该地区主要种植辣椒、布里雅尔、秋葵、番茄、长豆角、葫芦、洋葱和叶菜。阿巴马汀、Coragan、Applaud 和 Virtako 被用作杀虫剂,其中阿巴马汀最受农民欢迎(42%)。杀菌剂有 Mancozeb、Propineb 和 Canazole,其中使用率最高的是 Mancozeb(45%)。所有受访农民都将 Mortin 杀鼠剂用作杀鼠剂,他们在种植蔬菜时没有使用除草剂,而是用手拔除杂草。皮肤过敏是农民最常见的急性疾病(60%),而哮喘则是最常见的慢性疾病(31%)。该地区最常见的不良环境影响是路边堆积的空杀虫剂容器(95%)。所有农民在施用农药时都至少使用一种个人防护设备,但使用频率各不相同。大多数受访者使用手套、眼罩和脚套,但对脸部、头部和身体的防护缺乏认识。选择在室内储存农药的农民最多(51%),这导致农民接触农药的风险很高。大多数农民在使用农药后选择掩埋或焚烧农药瓶。大多数受访者(76%)更愿意使用化学农药,而不是其他方法,因为这些方法比较可靠。建议教育农民如何施用、储存、清洗和携带农药,不同个体保护设施的有效方法,以及利用行为减少接触毒药的机会。这将有助于减少对健康和环境的负面影响。此外,建议引入可靠有效的化学农药替代方法。关键词Periyaneelavanai 地区 蔬菜种植 农药 环境影响 疾病
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信