Farmers' perception of soil health: The use of quality data and its implication for farm management

IF 5 3区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Raquel N. R. Falcão, Michal Vrana, Csilla Hudek, Marco Pittarello, Laura Zavattaro, Barbara Moretti, Peter Strauss, Gunter Liebhard, Yangyang Li, Xiaoping Zhang, Miroslav Bauer, Tomáš Dostál, José A. Gomez, Iria Benavente‐Ferraces, Juan C. García‐Gil, César Plaza, Gema Guzmán, Maria Llanos Lopez, Bela Pirkó, Zsofia Bakacsi, Dimitre Nokolov, Josef Krása
{"title":"Farmers' perception of soil health: The use of quality data and its implication for farm management","authors":"Raquel N. R. Falcão, Michal Vrana, Csilla Hudek, Marco Pittarello, Laura Zavattaro, Barbara Moretti, Peter Strauss, Gunter Liebhard, Yangyang Li, Xiaoping Zhang, Miroslav Bauer, Tomáš Dostál, José A. Gomez, Iria Benavente‐Ferraces, Juan C. García‐Gil, César Plaza, Gema Guzmán, Maria Llanos Lopez, Bela Pirkó, Zsofia Bakacsi, Dimitre Nokolov, Josef Krása","doi":"10.1111/sum.13023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preventing and reversing soil degradation is essential to maintaining the ecosystem services provided by soils and guaranteeing food security. In addition to the scientific community, it is critical to engage multiple stakeholders to assess the degree of soil degradation and mitigation strategies' impact and meet the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, and other national and international goals. A semi‐structured questionnaire was distributed across countries participating in the EU Horizon‐2020 “Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in E.U. and China. Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation (TUdi).” Using farmers' associations and educational institutions as an intermediate to distribute the questionnaires was an effective strategy for gathering a high number of responses. Results from 456 responses to the questionnaire showed that farm country, size, type of agriculture, and educational level of farm managers were significantly associated with the farmers' perception of soil degradation issues. Farm size and type of agriculture were also correlated with applying a nutrient management plan. The implications of the results for soil conservation measures are discussed. Additionally, we highlight the potential of projects such as TUdi for creating collaboration networks to drive widespread adoption by farmers of technologies to reverse the degradation of agricultural soils.","PeriodicalId":21759,"journal":{"name":"Soil Use and Management","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Use and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventing and reversing soil degradation is essential to maintaining the ecosystem services provided by soils and guaranteeing food security. In addition to the scientific community, it is critical to engage multiple stakeholders to assess the degree of soil degradation and mitigation strategies' impact and meet the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, and other national and international goals. A semi‐structured questionnaire was distributed across countries participating in the EU Horizon‐2020 “Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in E.U. and China. Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation (TUdi).” Using farmers' associations and educational institutions as an intermediate to distribute the questionnaires was an effective strategy for gathering a high number of responses. Results from 456 responses to the questionnaire showed that farm country, size, type of agriculture, and educational level of farm managers were significantly associated with the farmers' perception of soil degradation issues. Farm size and type of agriculture were also correlated with applying a nutrient management plan. The implications of the results for soil conservation measures are discussed. Additionally, we highlight the potential of projects such as TUdi for creating collaboration networks to drive widespread adoption by farmers of technologies to reverse the degradation of agricultural soils.
农民对土壤健康的看法:质量数据的使用及其对农场管理的影响
防止和扭转土壤退化对维持土壤提供的生态系统服务和保障粮食安全至关重要。除科学界外,让多个利益相关方参与进来,以评估土壤退化程度和减缓战略的影响,并实现联合国可持续发展目标、欧盟共同农业政策以及其他国家和国际目标,也是至关重要的。在参与欧盟地平线-2020 "改变欧盟和中国关键农业系统中不可持续的土壤管理 "项目的国家中分发了一份半结构化问卷。开发扭转土壤退化的综合替代平台(TUdi)"。利用农民协会和教育机构作为分发问卷的中介,是收集大量答复的有效策略。456 份调查问卷的结果显示,农场的国家、规模、农业类型和农场管理人员的教育水平与农民对土壤退化问题的看法有很大关系。农场规模和农业类型也与养分管理计划的应用相关。我们讨论了这些结果对土壤保持措施的影响。此外,我们还强调了 TUdi 等项目在创建合作网络以推动农民广泛采用技术来扭转农业土壤退化方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Use and Management
Soil Use and Management 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
13.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Soil Use and Management publishes in soil science, earth and environmental science, agricultural science, and engineering fields. The submitted papers should consider the underlying mechanisms governing the natural and anthropogenic processes which affect soil systems, and should inform policy makers and/or practitioners on the sustainable use and management of soil resources. Interdisciplinary studies, e.g. linking soil with climate change, biodiversity, global health, and the UN’s sustainable development goals, with strong novelty, wide implications, and unexpected outcomes are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信