Digital methods for sensory media research: Toolmaking as a critical technical practice

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Jason Chao, Daniela van Geenen, Carolin Gerlitz, Fernando N van der Vlist
{"title":"Digital methods for sensory media research: Toolmaking as a critical technical practice","authors":"Jason Chao, Daniela van Geenen, Carolin Gerlitz, Fernando N van der Vlist","doi":"10.1177/13548565241226791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Digital methods’ turn to medium-specific and online avenues for social and cultural research. While these approaches foster empirical media studies, it has become increasingly challenging to ‘follow the medium’ and ‘repurpose’ its methods. The prominence of sensory media such as ‘smart’ networked devices (e.g. mobile phones) in mundane practices and their infrastructural dependencies confront media scholars with highly contingent objects of study. Yet, studying such sensor-based devices is crucial, for they enable continuous and unnoticed monitoring of everyday (inter)activity. The article suggests that developing digital methods for sensory media can be understood as specific ‘critical technical practice’ (CTP) by engaging with two toolmaking stories. It draws on and emphasises the fundamental similarity between CTP and digital methods which both aim at conjoining technical engagement and understanding with methodological reflection. The toolmaking stories explicate the making of and the limitations to developing digital methods for increasingly obfuscated mobile sensory media, exploring the possibilities of repurposing their functionality and data. They include building tools for app code analysis focused on apps’ capacity to track sensor data, as well as for ‘sensing’ and analysing network traffic of mobile devices in use. The featured toolmaking then unravels distinctive research affordances, that is, action possibilities for ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ modes of analysis grappling with the technicity of mobile sensory media and their data. We argue that toolmaking as CTP for sensory media studies implies engaging with these media as entangled infrastructures, examining not just their social, but also their technical ‘multi-situatedness’. This involves investigating the ‘liveliness’ of their data, or how it is generated, processed and made sense of. In conclusion, we discuss implications for ‘doing digital methods’ in sensory media research. Toolmaking itself becomes an inevitable form of media research and critique, inviting and challenging researchers to deploy the media’s situatedness for their investigations.","PeriodicalId":47242,"journal":{"name":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241226791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Digital methods’ turn to medium-specific and online avenues for social and cultural research. While these approaches foster empirical media studies, it has become increasingly challenging to ‘follow the medium’ and ‘repurpose’ its methods. The prominence of sensory media such as ‘smart’ networked devices (e.g. mobile phones) in mundane practices and their infrastructural dependencies confront media scholars with highly contingent objects of study. Yet, studying such sensor-based devices is crucial, for they enable continuous and unnoticed monitoring of everyday (inter)activity. The article suggests that developing digital methods for sensory media can be understood as specific ‘critical technical practice’ (CTP) by engaging with two toolmaking stories. It draws on and emphasises the fundamental similarity between CTP and digital methods which both aim at conjoining technical engagement and understanding with methodological reflection. The toolmaking stories explicate the making of and the limitations to developing digital methods for increasingly obfuscated mobile sensory media, exploring the possibilities of repurposing their functionality and data. They include building tools for app code analysis focused on apps’ capacity to track sensor data, as well as for ‘sensing’ and analysing network traffic of mobile devices in use. The featured toolmaking then unravels distinctive research affordances, that is, action possibilities for ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ modes of analysis grappling with the technicity of mobile sensory media and their data. We argue that toolmaking as CTP for sensory media studies implies engaging with these media as entangled infrastructures, examining not just their social, but also their technical ‘multi-situatedness’. This involves investigating the ‘liveliness’ of their data, or how it is generated, processed and made sense of. In conclusion, we discuss implications for ‘doing digital methods’ in sensory media research. Toolmaking itself becomes an inevitable form of media research and critique, inviting and challenging researchers to deploy the media’s situatedness for their investigations.
感官媒体研究的数字方法:作为重要技术实践的工具制作
数字方法 "转向特定媒介和在线社会与文化研究途径。虽然这些方法促进了实证媒体研究,但 "追随媒体 "和 "重新利用 "媒体方法的挑战也越来越大。感官媒体,如 "智能 "网络设备(如手机)在日常实践中的突出作用及其对基础设施的依赖性,使媒体学者面临着高度偶然的研究对象。然而,研究这类基于传感器的设备至关重要,因为它们能够对日常(相互)活动进行持续且不被注意的监测。文章认为,通过两个工具制造的故事,为感知媒体开发数字方法可以被理解为特定的 "批判性技术实践"(CTP)。文章借鉴并强调了批判性技术实践与数字方法之间的基本相似性,两者都旨在将技术参与和理解与方法论反思结合起来。工具制作故事阐述了针对日益模糊的移动感官媒体开发数字方法的过程和局限性,探索了重新利用其功能和数据的可能性。这些故事包括开发应用程序代码分析工具,重点关注应用程序跟踪传感器数据的能力,以及 "感知 "和分析使用中移动设备的网络流量。然后,特色工具制作揭示了与众不同的研究能力,即 "静态 "和 "动态 "分析模式的行动可能性,以解决移动感官媒体及其数据的技术性问题。我们认为,工具制作作为感官媒体研究的 CTP,意味着将这些媒体作为纠缠在一起的基础设施,不仅要研究其社会性,还要研究其技术性的 "多位置性"。这就需要研究其数据的 "生命力",或数据是如何生成、处理和理解的。最后,我们讨论了在感官媒体研究中 "使用数字方法 "的意义。工具制作本身已成为媒体研究和评论的一种不可避免的形式,它邀请并挑战研究人员利用媒体的情景性进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信