Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in individuals with chronic pain

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos , Rachel Sjouwerman , Mathijs Teppers , Johan W.S. Vlaeyen
{"title":"Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in individuals with chronic pain","authors":"Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos ,&nbsp;Rachel Sjouwerman ,&nbsp;Mathijs Teppers ,&nbsp;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Avoidance of pain has been argued to be key factor leading pain events to chronic disability. In this respect, research has focused on investigating the working mechanisms of avoidance's acquisition. Avoidance of painful stimuli has been traditionally studied using a combination of Pavlovian and Instrumental procedures. However, such approach seems to go against real-life scenarios where avoidance is commonly acquired more readily. Using a novel pain avoidance paradigm, we tested whether pain avoidance can be installed in absence of associations between a cue and pain omission, and whether such avoidance differs between pain patients and healthy controls. Participants first learned to avoid painful stimuli by pressing a grip bar. Then, they passively encountered pairings of one geometrical shape with pain and of another geometrical shape without pain. Lastly, participants encountered the geometrical shapes while being able to use the grip bar. Results showed that participants pressed the bar more vigorously when encountering the previously pain-related shape compared to the pain-unrelated shape. This effect did not seem to differ between pain patients and healthy control. Our study could inspire a new way in measuring avoidance in pain, possibly paving the way to better understanding how avoidance is installed in chronic pain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104491"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000184/pdfft?md5=2850a84d5d5fc108f3f43ddb55608882&pid=1-s2.0-S0005796724000184-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoidance of pain has been argued to be key factor leading pain events to chronic disability. In this respect, research has focused on investigating the working mechanisms of avoidance's acquisition. Avoidance of painful stimuli has been traditionally studied using a combination of Pavlovian and Instrumental procedures. However, such approach seems to go against real-life scenarios where avoidance is commonly acquired more readily. Using a novel pain avoidance paradigm, we tested whether pain avoidance can be installed in absence of associations between a cue and pain omission, and whether such avoidance differs between pain patients and healthy controls. Participants first learned to avoid painful stimuli by pressing a grip bar. Then, they passively encountered pairings of one geometrical shape with pain and of another geometrical shape without pain. Lastly, participants encountered the geometrical shapes while being able to use the grip bar. Results showed that participants pressed the bar more vigorously when encountering the previously pain-related shape compared to the pain-unrelated shape. This effect did not seem to differ between pain patients and healthy control. Our study could inspire a new way in measuring avoidance in pain, possibly paving the way to better understanding how avoidance is installed in chronic pain.

慢性疼痛患者从巴甫洛夫到仪器的转移
回避疼痛被认为是导致疼痛事件发展为慢性残疾的关键因素。在这方面,研究的重点是调查获得回避的工作机制。对疼痛刺激的回避,传统上采用巴甫洛夫法和工具法相结合的方法进行研究。然而,这种方法似乎与现实生活中更容易获得回避的场景相悖。我们使用了一种新颖的疼痛回避范式,测试了在线索和疼痛遗漏之间没有关联的情况下,是否可以建立疼痛回避,以及这种回避在疼痛患者和健康对照组之间是否存在差异。参与者首先通过按压握杆学会回避疼痛刺激。然后,他们被动地遇到一种有疼痛的几何形状和另一种无疼痛的几何形状的配对。最后,参与者在能够使用握杆的情况下接触几何图形。结果表明,与没有疼痛感的几何图形相比,参与者在遇到先前与疼痛有关的几何图形时会更用力地按压握杆。这种效果在疼痛患者和健康对照组之间似乎没有差异。我们的研究可以为测量疼痛中的回避现象提供一种新的方法,从而为更好地理解回避现象是如何在慢性疼痛中产生的铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信