An association between heart rate variability and incident heart failure in an elderly cohort

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bozena Ostrowska MD, Lars Lind MD, PhD, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist MD, PhD
{"title":"An association between heart rate variability and incident heart failure in an elderly cohort","authors":"Bozena Ostrowska MD,&nbsp;Lars Lind MD, PhD,&nbsp;Carina Blomström-Lundqvist MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/clc.24241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Early identification of individuals at risk of developing heart failure (HF) may improve poor prognosis. A dominant sympathetic activity is common in HF and associated with worse outcomes; however, less is known about the autonomic balance before HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>A low frequency/high frequency (L-F/H-F) ratio, index of heart rate variability, and marker of the autonomic balance predict the development of HF and may improve the performance of the HF prediction model when added to traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals in the PIVUS (Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors) study (<i>n</i> = 1016, all aged 70 years) were included. Exclusion criteria were prevalent HF, electrocardiographic QRS duration ≥130 millisecond, major arrhythmias, or conduction blocks at baseline. The association between the L-F/H-F ratio and incident HF was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The C-statistic evaluated whether adding the L-F/H-F-ratio to traditional CV risk factors improved the discrimination of incident HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>HF developed in 107/836 study participants during 15 years of follow-up. A nonlinear, inverse association between the L-F/H-F ratio and incident HF was mainly driven by an L-F/H-F ratio of &lt;30. The association curve was flat for higher values (hazard ratio, HR for the total curve = 0.78 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.69−0.88, <i>p</i> &lt; .001]; HR = 2 for L-F/H-F ratio = 10). The traditional prediction model improved by 3.3% (<i>p</i> &lt; .03) when the L-F/H-F ratio was added.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>An L-F/H-F ratio of &lt;30 was related to incident HF and improved HF prediction when added to traditional CV risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Early identification of individuals at risk of developing heart failure (HF) may improve poor prognosis. A dominant sympathetic activity is common in HF and associated with worse outcomes; however, less is known about the autonomic balance before HF.

Hypothesis

A low frequency/high frequency (L-F/H-F) ratio, index of heart rate variability, and marker of the autonomic balance predict the development of HF and may improve the performance of the HF prediction model when added to traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors.

Methods

Individuals in the PIVUS (Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors) study (n = 1016, all aged 70 years) were included. Exclusion criteria were prevalent HF, electrocardiographic QRS duration ≥130 millisecond, major arrhythmias, or conduction blocks at baseline. The association between the L-F/H-F ratio and incident HF was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The C-statistic evaluated whether adding the L-F/H-F-ratio to traditional CV risk factors improved the discrimination of incident HF.

Results

HF developed in 107/836 study participants during 15 years of follow-up. A nonlinear, inverse association between the L-F/H-F ratio and incident HF was mainly driven by an L-F/H-F ratio of <30. The association curve was flat for higher values (hazard ratio, HR for the total curve = 0.78 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.69−0.88, p < .001]; HR = 2 for L-F/H-F ratio = 10). The traditional prediction model improved by 3.3% (p < .03) when the L-F/H-F ratio was added.

Conclusions

An L-F/H-F ratio of <30 was related to incident HF and improved HF prediction when added to traditional CV risk factors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年人群中心率变异性与心力衰竭发病率之间的关系。
背景:及早识别有患心力衰竭(HF)风险的个体可改善不良预后。交感神经活动占主导地位在心力衰竭中很常见,并与较差的预后有关;然而,人们对心力衰竭前的自律神经平衡知之甚少:假设:低频/高频(L-F/H-F)比值、心率变异性指数和自律神经平衡标志物可预测心房颤动的发展,如果加入传统的心血管(CV)风险因素,可提高心房颤动预测模型的性能:方法:纳入 PIVUS(乌普萨拉老年人血管前瞻性调查)研究的个体(n = 1016,年龄均为 70 岁)。排除标准为心房颤动、心电图 QRS 持续时间≥130 毫秒、严重心律失常或基线传导阻滞。L-F/H-F比值与心房颤动发病率之间的关系采用Cox比例危险分析法进行评估。C统计量评估了将L-F/H-F比值添加到传统的CV风险因素中是否能提高对突发HF的辨别能力:结果:在15年的随访过程中,107/836名研究参与者患上了心房颤动。L-F-F/H-F比率与心房颤动发病率之间的非线性反比关系主要由L-F-F/H-F比率为结论所驱动:L-F/H-F比率为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信