Effectiveness of Switching CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Non-Responder Patients in the UAE: A Retrospective Study.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Reem Suliman, Vanessa Santos, Ibrahim Al Qaisi, Batool Aldaher, Ahmed Al Fardan, Hajir Al Barrawy, Yazan Bader, Jonna Lyn Supena, Kathrina Alejandro, Taoufik Alsaadi
{"title":"Effectiveness of Switching CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Non-Responder Patients in the UAE: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Reem Suliman, Vanessa Santos, Ibrahim Al Qaisi, Batool Aldaher, Ahmed Al Fardan, Hajir Al Barrawy, Yazan Bader, Jonna Lyn Supena, Kathrina Alejandro, Taoufik Alsaadi","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16010019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 1","pages":"274-288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16010019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response.

阿联酋非应答患者转换 CGRP 单克隆抗体的有效性:回顾性研究。
与其他预防性治疗方案相比,降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体(CGRP mAbs)在偏头痛治疗中显示出良好的疗效。对于偏头痛患者来说,在不同抗体类别之间转换治疗方案仍存在许多问题。这项初步的回顾性真实世界研究探讨了因缺乏疗效或耐受性差而在 CGRP mAb 类别之间转换的患者的治疗反应。共有53名偏头痛患者因原先处方的CGRP mAb疗效不佳而在三种CGRP mAb之间进行了转换,具体包括eptinezumab、erenumab和galcanezumab。Fremanezumab 因在阿联酋无法买到而未包括在内。galcanezumab和eptinezumab靶向CGRP配体(CGRP/L),而erenumab靶向CGRP受体(CGRP/R)。疗效分析表明,两个类别转换队列(CGRP/R 转换为 CGRP/L 和 CGRP/L 转换为 CGRP/R)的疗效均有所改善。在 CGRP 类别之间转换的安全性也得到了很好的观察,因为在转换类别之前出现的任何不良反应都不会导致后来转换类别后停止治疗。这项研究的结果表明,在不同类别的 CGRP mAb 之间转换是一种潜在的安全和临床可行的做法,对于那些目前使用的 CGRP mAb 出现副作用或出现次优反应的患者可能有一定的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信