Choice in the Context of Dementia: Emerging Issues for Health Care Practice in Aging Societies

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nancy Berlinger, Emily A. Largent, Mara Buchbinder, Mildred Z. Solomon
{"title":"Choice in the Context of Dementia: Emerging Issues for Health Care Practice in Aging Societies","authors":"Nancy Berlinger,&nbsp;Emily A. Largent,&nbsp;Mara Buchbinder,&nbsp;Mildred Z. Solomon","doi":"10.1002/hast.1549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>This introduction to the special report “Facing Dementia: Clarifying End-of-Life Choices, Supporting Better Lives” explains why focused attention to dementia is needed in bioethics and in health care practice in a range of settings. It explains how this strongly age-associated condition shapes individual lives over years, revealing inequities in how dementia care is financed. The introduction explains the structure of the report, which consists of five essays, a consolidated set of recommendations from these essays, bibliographies, and other resources. The first essay is a landscape review written for health care professionals to support discussion, debate, and deliberation within professional societies and networks concerning a patient's voluntary choice to hasten their own death in the context of a dementia diagnosis. The landscape review is followed by three essays that suggest how several familiar concepts within care for persons with serious illness should be rethought to better support advance care planning, physician-patient conversations, and access to community-based palliative care and hospice when a person is facing dementia. The final essay presents a bold, practical argument for supporting better lives for people facing dementia, and for dementia caregivers, through primary care, the usual source of care for people with dementia</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"54 S1","pages":"S2-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.1549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This introduction to the special report “Facing Dementia: Clarifying End-of-Life Choices, Supporting Better Lives” explains why focused attention to dementia is needed in bioethics and in health care practice in a range of settings. It explains how this strongly age-associated condition shapes individual lives over years, revealing inequities in how dementia care is financed. The introduction explains the structure of the report, which consists of five essays, a consolidated set of recommendations from these essays, bibliographies, and other resources. The first essay is a landscape review written for health care professionals to support discussion, debate, and deliberation within professional societies and networks concerning a patient's voluntary choice to hasten their own death in the context of a dementia diagnosis. The landscape review is followed by three essays that suggest how several familiar concepts within care for persons with serious illness should be rethought to better support advance care planning, physician-patient conversations, and access to community-based palliative care and hospice when a person is facing dementia. The final essay presents a bold, practical argument for supporting better lives for people facing dementia, and for dementia caregivers, through primary care, the usual source of care for people with dementia.

痴呆症背景下的选择:老龄化社会中医疗实践的新问题
这是《面对痴呆症》特别报告的导言:面对痴呆症:明确生命终结的选择,支持更美好的生活》解释了为什么在生命伦理学和各种医疗保健实践中需要重点关注痴呆症。报告解释了这种与年龄密切相关的疾病如何影响个人多年的生活,揭示了痴呆症护理资金来源的不平等。导言解释了报告的结构,报告由五篇文章、这些文章的综合建议、参考书目和其他资源组成。第一篇文章是为医护专业人员撰写的综述,旨在支持专业协会和网络就痴呆症诊断背景下患者自愿选择加速自己死亡的问题进行讨论、辩论和审议。在这篇综述之后,有三篇文章提出了应该如何重新思考重病患者照护中的几个熟悉概念,以更好地支持预先照护计划、医患对话,以及在患者面临痴呆症时获得社区姑息关怀和临终关怀。最后一篇文章提出了一个大胆而实用的论点,即通过初级医疗这一痴呆症患者的常规护理渠道,为痴呆症患者和痴呆症护理者提供更好的生活支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信