A meta-analysis reveals increases in soil organic carbon following the restoration and recovery of croplands in Southwest China

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Zihao Guo, Shuting Zhang, Lichen Zhang, Yangzhou Xiang, Jianping Wu
{"title":"A meta-analysis reveals increases in soil organic carbon following the restoration and recovery of croplands in Southwest China","authors":"Zihao Guo,&nbsp;Shuting Zhang,&nbsp;Lichen Zhang,&nbsp;Yangzhou Xiang,&nbsp;Jianping Wu","doi":"10.1002/eap.2944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In China, the Grain for Green Program (GGP) is an ambitious project to convert croplands into natural vegetation, but exactly how changes in vegetation translate into changes in soil organic carbon remains less clear. Here we conducted a meta-analysis using 734 observations to explore the effects of land recovery on soil organic carbon and nutrients in four provinces in Southwest China. Following GGP, the soil organic carbon content (SOCc) and soil organic carbon stock (SOCs) increased by 33.73% and 22.39%, respectively, compared with the surrounding croplands. Similarly, soil nitrogen increased, while phosphorus decreased. Outcomes were heterogeneous, but depended on variations in soil and environmental characteristics. Both the regional land use and cover change indicated by the landscape type transfer matrix and net primary production from 2000 to 2020 further confirmed that the GGP promoted the forest area and regional mean net primary production. Our findings suggest that the GGP could enhance soil and vegetation carbon sequestration in Southwest China and help to develop a carbon-neutral strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2944","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In China, the Grain for Green Program (GGP) is an ambitious project to convert croplands into natural vegetation, but exactly how changes in vegetation translate into changes in soil organic carbon remains less clear. Here we conducted a meta-analysis using 734 observations to explore the effects of land recovery on soil organic carbon and nutrients in four provinces in Southwest China. Following GGP, the soil organic carbon content (SOCc) and soil organic carbon stock (SOCs) increased by 33.73% and 22.39%, respectively, compared with the surrounding croplands. Similarly, soil nitrogen increased, while phosphorus decreased. Outcomes were heterogeneous, but depended on variations in soil and environmental characteristics. Both the regional land use and cover change indicated by the landscape type transfer matrix and net primary production from 2000 to 2020 further confirmed that the GGP promoted the forest area and regional mean net primary production. Our findings suggest that the GGP could enhance soil and vegetation carbon sequestration in Southwest China and help to develop a carbon-neutral strategy.

一项荟萃分析显示,中国西南地区耕地恢复后,土壤有机碳有所增加。
在中国,"绿色粮食计划"(GGP)是一个雄心勃勃的项目,旨在将耕地转化为自然植被,但植被的变化究竟如何转化为土壤有机碳的变化仍不太清楚。在此,我们利用 734 项观测数据进行了一项荟萃分析,以探讨土地恢复对中国西南四省土壤有机碳和养分的影响。与周边耕地相比,GGP 后土壤有机碳含量(SOCc)和土壤有机碳储量(SOCs)分别增加了 33.73% 和 22.39%。同样,土壤氮增加了,而磷减少了。结果各不相同,但取决于土壤和环境特征的变化。景观类型转换矩阵显示的区域土地利用和植被变化以及 2000 年至 2020 年的净初级生产力都进一步证实,全球绿色增长方案促进了森林面积和区域平均净初级生产力的提高。我们的研究结果表明,全球绿色增长计划可以提高中国西南地区的土壤和植被固碳能力,并有助于制定碳中和战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信