Is the Electroconvulsive Therapy Video on YouTube Supportive Information for Patients and Their Primary Caregivers?

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Journal of Ect Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000000996
Mohammad A Abu Sabra, Mahmoud Al Kalaldeh, Mohammad R AlOsta
{"title":"Is the Electroconvulsive Therapy Video on YouTube Supportive Information for Patients and Their Primary Caregivers?","authors":"Mohammad A Abu Sabra, Mahmoud Al Kalaldeh, Mohammad R AlOsta","doi":"10.1097/YCT.0000000000000996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a significant contemporary medical treatment modality for various mental disorders that have not responded to other treatments. YouTube is a valuable place to get health-related educational content that can have a big impact on patients' and their primary caregivers' behaviors and decisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to analyze the content of YouTube videos related to ECT to investigate the quality and reliability of videos as supportive information for patients and their primary caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 250 videos related to ECT that are available on YouTube were analyzed. The Global Quality Scale and the modified DISCERN tool were used to assess the quality and reliability of the videos. Details of the content of the video, caregiver appearance, methods of information presentation, source of the video, and video parameters were analyzed as well.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The analysis revealed that the median total score of Global Quality Scale was 3 (interquartile range, 2; min-max, 1-5), which means the video quality was medium. The median total score of the modified DISCERN tool was 3 (interquartile range, 1; min-max, 0-5), which means the videos were highly reliable. Most of the video sources in the included videos were educational (41.2%, n = 103) from formal caregivers, and there was no significant difference between Global Quality Scale scores, video parameters, and modified DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>YouTube is considered a supportive source of information related to ECT but needs more encouragement from formal caregivers to disseminate high-quality and reliable healthcare content on YouTube platforms to ensure access to accurate information.</p>","PeriodicalId":54844,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ect","volume":" ","pages":"124-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ect","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a significant contemporary medical treatment modality for various mental disorders that have not responded to other treatments. YouTube is a valuable place to get health-related educational content that can have a big impact on patients' and their primary caregivers' behaviors and decisions.

Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the content of YouTube videos related to ECT to investigate the quality and reliability of videos as supportive information for patients and their primary caregivers.

Methods: A total of 250 videos related to ECT that are available on YouTube were analyzed. The Global Quality Scale and the modified DISCERN tool were used to assess the quality and reliability of the videos. Details of the content of the video, caregiver appearance, methods of information presentation, source of the video, and video parameters were analyzed as well.

Result: The analysis revealed that the median total score of Global Quality Scale was 3 (interquartile range, 2; min-max, 1-5), which means the video quality was medium. The median total score of the modified DISCERN tool was 3 (interquartile range, 1; min-max, 0-5), which means the videos were highly reliable. Most of the video sources in the included videos were educational (41.2%, n = 103) from formal caregivers, and there was no significant difference between Global Quality Scale scores, video parameters, and modified DISCERN scores.

Conclusions: YouTube is considered a supportive source of information related to ECT but needs more encouragement from formal caregivers to disseminate high-quality and reliable healthcare content on YouTube platforms to ensure access to accurate information.

YouTube 上的电休克疗法视频是否为患者及其主要护理人员提供了辅助信息?
背景:电休克疗法(ECT)是当代治疗对其他疗法无效的各种精神障碍的重要医疗方式。YouTube是获取健康相关教育内容的重要渠道,这些内容可能会对患者及其主要护理人员的行为和决定产生重大影响:本研究旨在分析 YouTube 上与电痉挛疗法相关的视频内容,以调查视频作为患者及其主要护理人员辅助信息的质量和可靠性:分析了 YouTube 上与 ECT 相关的 250 个视频。采用全球质量量表和改进的 DISCERN 工具来评估视频的质量和可靠性。此外,还分析了视频内容、护理人员外表、信息呈现方法、视频来源和视频参数等细节:分析结果显示,总体质量量表总分的中位数为 3(四分位数间距为 2;最小-最大值为 1-5),即视频质量为中等。修改后的 DISCERN 工具总分的中位数为 3(四分位数间距为 1;最小-最大值为 0-5),表示视频的可靠性很高。收录视频中的大多数视频来源都是正规护理人员提供的教育性视频(41.2%,n = 103),全球质量量表评分、视频参数和修改后的 DISCERN 评分之间没有显著差异:YouTube被认为是ECT相关信息的支持性来源,但需要正规护理人员给予更多鼓励,以便在YouTube平台上传播高质量、可靠的医疗保健内容,确保人们能够获得准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ect
Journal of Ect 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of ECT covers all aspects of contemporary electroconvulsive therapy, reporting on major clinical and research developments worldwide. Leading clinicians and researchers examine the effects of induced seizures on behavior and on organ systems; review important research results on the mode of induction, occurrence, and propagation of seizures; and explore the difficult sociological, ethical, and legal issues concerning the use of ECT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信