Systematic review and analysis of self-efficacy in sun protection measurement instruments.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000879
Jeanne M Ward, Frances Hardin-Fanning
{"title":"Systematic review and analysis of self-efficacy in sun protection measurement instruments.","authors":"Jeanne M Ward, Frances Hardin-Fanning","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was toidentify and appraise available sun protection self-efficacy instruments and synthesize information.</p><p><strong>Data source: </strong>A systematic search of electronic databases from 2005 to 2023 included PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO .</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>While instruments have been developed to evaluate sun-protective behaviors and self-efficacy separately, sun-protection self-efficacy instruments have yet to be widely studied. Self-efficacy is an essential antecedent to performing health-related behaviors or practices that can promote or hinder the health of individuals and groups.</p><p><strong>Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: </strong>Studies randomized control trials or descriptive studies that used self-efficacy measurement tools to evaluate behaviors, intentions, and sun protection knowledge were included in this review. Sun protection surveys that targeted providers or parents and non-English articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Data were extracted by one independent researcher.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criterion and included 10 scales of self-efficacy in sun protection. Study design and purpose, and the instrument's validity and reliability statistics, including Cronbach's alphas, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-factor self-efficacy in sun protection scale was the most common measure for primary prevention, with acceptable reliability and validity. However, other instruments also showed reliable psychometric properties, especially measures of sunscreen self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research in self-efficacy measurement is warranted to examine specific populations and determine the appropriate constructs of self-efficacy. It is crucial to design evidence-based interventions that affect self-efficacy, are measured by a reliable, valid instrument, and have the potential to increase sun-protective and screening behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"390-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was toidentify and appraise available sun protection self-efficacy instruments and synthesize information.

Data source: A systematic search of electronic databases from 2005 to 2023 included PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and PsycINFO .

Background: While instruments have been developed to evaluate sun-protective behaviors and self-efficacy separately, sun-protection self-efficacy instruments have yet to be widely studied. Self-efficacy is an essential antecedent to performing health-related behaviors or practices that can promote or hinder the health of individuals and groups.

Study inclusion and exclusion criteria: Studies randomized control trials or descriptive studies that used self-efficacy measurement tools to evaluate behaviors, intentions, and sun protection knowledge were included in this review. Sun protection surveys that targeted providers or parents and non-English articles were excluded.

Data extraction: Data were extracted by one independent researcher.

Data synthesis: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criterion and included 10 scales of self-efficacy in sun protection. Study design and purpose, and the instrument's validity and reliability statistics, including Cronbach's alphas, were extracted.

Results: The two-factor self-efficacy in sun protection scale was the most common measure for primary prevention, with acceptable reliability and validity. However, other instruments also showed reliable psychometric properties, especially measures of sunscreen self-efficacy.

Conclusion: More research in self-efficacy measurement is warranted to examine specific populations and determine the appropriate constructs of self-efficacy. It is crucial to design evidence-based interventions that affect self-efficacy, are measured by a reliable, valid instrument, and have the potential to increase sun-protective and screening behaviors.

对防晒测量工具中的自我效能进行系统回顾和分析。
研究目的本研究旨在确定和评估现有的防晒自我效能工具,并对信息进行综合:数据来源: 对 2005 年至 2023 年的电子数据库进行了系统检索,包括 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase 和 PsycINFO:背景:虽然已经开发出了分别评估防晒行为和自我效能的工具,但防晒自我效能工具尚未得到广泛研究。自我效能感是实施与健康相关的行为或实践的重要先决条件,可促进或阻碍个人和群体的健康:本综述包括使用自我效能测量工具来评估行为、意向和防晒知识的随机对照试验或描述性研究。以提供者或家长为对象的防晒调查以及非英语文章不在研究范围之内:数据提取:由一名独立研究人员进行数据提取:15 项研究符合纳入标准,包括 10 个防晒自我效能量表。提取了研究设计和目的,以及工具的有效性和可靠性统计,包括 Cronbach's alphas:结果:双因素防晒自我效能感量表是最常用的初级预防测量工具,其信度和效度均可接受。然而,其他测量工具也显示出可靠的心理测量特性,尤其是防晒自我效能感测量工具:结论:需要对自我效能感测量进行更多研究,以考察特定人群并确定适当的自我效能感结构。关键是要设计出以证据为基础的干预措施,这些干预措施会影响自我效能感,并通过可靠、有效的工具进行测量,而且有可能增加防晒和筛查行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信