Pilot study to evaluate the need and implementation of a multifaceted nurse-led antimicrobial stewardship intervention in residential aged care.

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae016
Natali Jokanovic, Sue J Lee, Terry Haines, Sarah N Hilmer, Yun-Hee Jeon, Laura Travis, Darshini Ayton, Eliza Watson, Tess Tsindos, Andrew J Stewardson, Rhonda L Stuart, Allen C Cheng, Trisha N Peel, Anton Y Peleg
{"title":"Pilot study to evaluate the need and implementation of a multifaceted nurse-led antimicrobial stewardship intervention in residential aged care.","authors":"Natali Jokanovic, Sue J Lee, Terry Haines, Sarah N Hilmer, Yun-Hee Jeon, Laura Travis, Darshini Ayton, Eliza Watson, Tess Tsindos, Andrew J Stewardson, Rhonda L Stuart, Allen C Cheng, Trisha N Peel, Anton Y Peleg","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the need and feasibility of a nurse-led antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme in two Australian residential aged care homes (RACHs) to inform a stepped-wedged, cluster randomized controlled trial (SW-cRCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods pilot study of a nurse-led AMS programme was performed in two RACHs in Victoria, Australia (July-December 2019). The AMS programme comprised education, infection assessment and management guidelines, and documentation to support appropriate antimicrobial use in urinary, lower respiratory and skin/soft tissue infections. The programme was implemented over three phases: (i) pre-implementation education and integration (1 month); (ii) implementation of the intervention (3 months); and (iii) post-intervention evaluation (1 month). Baseline RACH and resident data and weekly infection and antimicrobial usage were collected and analysed descriptively to evaluate the need for AMS strategies. Feedback on intervention resources and implementation barriers were identified from semi-structured interviews, an online staff questionnaire and researcher field notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six key barriers to implementation of the intervention were identified and used to refine the intervention: aged care staffing and capacity; access to education; resistance to practice change; role of staff in AMS; leadership and ownership of the intervention at the RACH and organization level; and family expectations. A total of 61 antimicrobials were prescribed for 40 residents over the 3 month intervention. Overall, 48% of antibiotics did not meet minimum criteria for appropriate initiation (respiratory: 73%; urinary: 54%; skin/soft tissue: 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several barriers and opportunities to improve implementation of AMS in RACHs were identified. Findings were used to inform a revised intervention to be evaluated in a larger SW-cRCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 1","pages":"dlae016"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10873136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the need and feasibility of a nurse-led antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme in two Australian residential aged care homes (RACHs) to inform a stepped-wedged, cluster randomized controlled trial (SW-cRCT).

Methods: A mixed-methods pilot study of a nurse-led AMS programme was performed in two RACHs in Victoria, Australia (July-December 2019). The AMS programme comprised education, infection assessment and management guidelines, and documentation to support appropriate antimicrobial use in urinary, lower respiratory and skin/soft tissue infections. The programme was implemented over three phases: (i) pre-implementation education and integration (1 month); (ii) implementation of the intervention (3 months); and (iii) post-intervention evaluation (1 month). Baseline RACH and resident data and weekly infection and antimicrobial usage were collected and analysed descriptively to evaluate the need for AMS strategies. Feedback on intervention resources and implementation barriers were identified from semi-structured interviews, an online staff questionnaire and researcher field notes.

Results: Six key barriers to implementation of the intervention were identified and used to refine the intervention: aged care staffing and capacity; access to education; resistance to practice change; role of staff in AMS; leadership and ownership of the intervention at the RACH and organization level; and family expectations. A total of 61 antimicrobials were prescribed for 40 residents over the 3 month intervention. Overall, 48% of antibiotics did not meet minimum criteria for appropriate initiation (respiratory: 73%; urinary: 54%; skin/soft tissue: 0%).

Conclusions: Several barriers and opportunities to improve implementation of AMS in RACHs were identified. Findings were used to inform a revised intervention to be evaluated in a larger SW-cRCT.

开展试点研究,评估在养老院护理中实施由护士主导的多方面抗菌药物管理干预措施的必要性和实施情况。
目的评估澳大利亚两家养老院(RACHs)中由护士主导的抗菌药物管理(AMS)计划的必要性和可行性,为阶梯式分组随机对照试验(SW-cRCT)提供依据:在澳大利亚维多利亚州的两家养老院开展了一项以护士为主导的AMS计划的混合方法试点研究(2019年7月至12月)。AMS计划包括教育、感染评估和管理指南,以及支持在泌尿系统、下呼吸道和皮肤/软组织感染中适当使用抗菌药物的文件。该计划分三个阶段实施:(i) 实施前教育和整合(1 个月);(ii) 实施干预(3 个月);(iii) 干预后评估(1 个月)。收集了 RACH 和住院患者的基线数据以及每周的感染和抗菌药物使用情况,并进行了描述性分析,以评估对 AMS 策略的需求。通过半结构式访谈、在线员工问卷调查和研究人员的实地记录,确定了干预资源和实施障碍的反馈信息:结果:确定了实施干预措施的六大障碍,并利用这些障碍完善了干预措施:老年护理人员的编制和能力;获得教育的机会;实践变革的阻力;工作人员在AMS中的角色;RACH和组织层面对干预措施的领导力和自主权;以及家庭的期望。在为期 3 个月的干预过程中,共为 40 名住院者开出了 61 种抗菌药物处方。总体而言,48%的抗生素不符合适当启动的最低标准(呼吸系统:73%;泌尿系统:54%;皮肤/软组织:0%):结论:研究发现了在区域保健中心(RACHs)实施急性呼吸系统综合症(AMS)的若干障碍和改进机会。研究结果为一项修订后的干预措施提供了依据,该干预措施将在一项更大规模的全部门研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信