The outcomes of patients with septic shock treated with propafenone compared to amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias are related to end-systolic left atrial volume.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Petr Waldauf, Michal Porizka, Jan Horejsek, Michal Otahal, Eva Svobodova, Ivana Jurisinova, Michal Maly, Tomas Brozek, Jan Rulisek, Pavel Trachta, Tomas Tencer, Adela Krajcova, Frantisek Duska, Martin Balik
{"title":"The outcomes of patients with septic shock treated with propafenone compared to amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias are related to end-systolic left atrial volume.","authors":"Petr Waldauf, Michal Porizka, Jan Horejsek, Michal Otahal, Eva Svobodova, Ivana Jurisinova, Michal Maly, Tomas Brozek, Jan Rulisek, Pavel Trachta, Tomas Tencer, Adela Krajcova, Frantisek Duska, Martin Balik","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A recently published trial has shown no differences in outcomes between patients with new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) in septic shock treated with either propafenone or amiodarone. However, these outcome data have not been evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of a dilated left atrium (LA).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with SVA and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 35% were randomized to receive intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). They were divided into groups based on whether their end-systolic left atrial volume (LAVI) was ≥40 mL/m². The subgroup outcomes assessed were survival at ICU discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Propafenone cardioverted earlier (P = 0.009) and with fewer recurrences (P = 0.001) in the patients without LA enlargement (n = 133). Patients with LAVI < 40 mL/m2 demonstrated a mortality benefit of propafenone over the follow-up of 1 year [Cox regression, hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), P = 0.014]. Patients with dilated LA (n = 37) achieved rhythm control earlier in amiodarone (P = 0.05) with similar rates of recurrences (P = 0.5) compared to propafenone. The outcomes for patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m2 were less favourable with propafenone compared to amiodarone at 1 month [HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), P = 0.045]; however, it did not reach statistical significance at 1 year [HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), P = 0.138].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with non-dilated LA who achieved rhythm control with propafenone in the setting of septic shock had better short-term and long-term outcomes than those treated with amiodarone, which seemed to be more effective in patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m².</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03029169, registered on 24 January 2017.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"414-422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuae023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: A recently published trial has shown no differences in outcomes between patients with new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) in septic shock treated with either propafenone or amiodarone. However, these outcome data have not been evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of a dilated left atrium (LA).

Methods and results: Patients with SVA and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 35% were randomized to receive intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). They were divided into groups based on whether their end-systolic left atrial volume (LAVI) was ≥40 mL/m². The subgroup outcomes assessed were survival at ICU discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Propafenone cardioverted earlier (P = 0.009) and with fewer recurrences (P = 0.001) in the patients without LA enlargement (n = 133). Patients with LAVI < 40 mL/m2 demonstrated a mortality benefit of propafenone over the follow-up of 1 year [Cox regression, hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), P = 0.014]. Patients with dilated LA (n = 37) achieved rhythm control earlier in amiodarone (P = 0.05) with similar rates of recurrences (P = 0.5) compared to propafenone. The outcomes for patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m2 were less favourable with propafenone compared to amiodarone at 1 month [HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), P = 0.045]; however, it did not reach statistical significance at 1 year [HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), P = 0.138].

Conclusion: Patients with non-dilated LA who achieved rhythm control with propafenone in the setting of septic shock had better short-term and long-term outcomes than those treated with amiodarone, which seemed to be more effective in patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m².

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03029169, registered on 24 January 2017.

与胺碘酮相比,脓毒性休克患者接受普罗帕酮治疗室上性心律失常的疗效与收缩末期左房容积有关。
背景:最近发表的一项试验显示,脓毒性休克新发室上性心律失常(SVA)患者在接受普罗帕酮或胺碘酮治疗后的预后没有差异。然而,这些结果数据尚未与是否存在扩张的左心房(LA)相关联进行评估:方法:对左室射血分数≥35%的SVA患者进行随机分组,静脉注射普罗帕酮(70毫克栓剂,400-840毫克/24小时)或胺碘酮(300毫克栓剂,600-1800毫克/24小时)。根据患者收缩末期左心房容积(LAVI)是否≥40 ml/m²将其分为不同组别。评估的分组结果为重症监护室出院时、1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的存活率:结果:普罗帕酮对无 LA 扩大的患者(133 人)起搏更早(p=0.009),复发更少(p=0.001)。LAVI˂40毫升/平方米的患者在随访1年期间可从普罗帕酮中获益(Cox回归,HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), p=0.014)。与普罗帕酮相比,扩张型 LA 患者(37 人)使用胺碘酮(p=0.05)可更早地控制心律,但复发率(p=0.5)相似。与胺碘酮相比,LAVI≥40 ml/m2的患者在1个月时使用普罗帕酮的疗效较差(HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), p=0.045),但在1年时(HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), p=0.138)没有统计学意义:脓毒性休克时使用普罗帕酮控制心律的非扩张型LA患者的短期和长期预后均优于使用胺碘酮治疗的患者,后者似乎对LAVI≥40 ml/m²的患者更有效:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03029169,注册日期:2017年1月24日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
325
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Acute Cardiovascular Care (EHJ-ACVC) offers a unique integrative approach by combining the expertise of the different sub specialties of cardiology, emergency and intensive care medicine in the management of patients with acute cardiovascular syndromes. Reading through the journal, cardiologists and all other healthcare professionals can access continuous updates that may help them to improve the quality of care and the outcome for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信