Measurement Invariance is Not Sufficient for Meaningful and Valid Group Comparisons: A Note on Robitzsch and Lüdtke

IF 2.5 2区心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1080/10705511.2023.2254497

Tenko Raykov

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note demonstrates that measurement invariance does not guarantee meaningful and valid group comparisons in multiple-population settings. The article follows on a recent critical discussion by ...

查看原文本刊更多论文

测量不变性不足以进行有意义和有效的小组比较：关于 Robitzsch 和 Lüdtke 的说明

本说明表明，测量不变性并不能保证在多人群环境中进行有意义和有效的群体比较。这篇文章是继最近......

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 数学-数学跨学科应用

CiteScore

8.70

自引率

11.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal publishes refereed scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in structural equation modeling. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, psychology, medicine, sociology, education, political science, economics, management, and business/marketing. Theoretical articles address new developments; applied articles deal with innovative structural equation modeling applications; the Teacher’s Corner provides instructional modules on aspects of structural equation modeling; book and software reviews examine new modeling information and techniques; and advertising alerts readers to new products. Comments on technical or substantive issues addressed in articles or reviews published in the journal are encouraged; comments are reviewed, and authors of the original works are invited to respond.