Use of Fixed Wing Modified Scene Air Ambulance Responses for Injured Patients in Northern Ontario: A Pilot Study

Q3 Nursing
Nicole Willis MClSc , Karla Gagnon , Kealin Wong MD , Melissa McGowan MHK , Brodie Nolan MD, MSc
{"title":"Use of Fixed Wing Modified Scene Air Ambulance Responses for Injured Patients in Northern Ontario: A Pilot Study","authors":"Nicole Willis MClSc ,&nbsp;Karla Gagnon ,&nbsp;Kealin Wong MD ,&nbsp;Melissa McGowan MHK ,&nbsp;Brodie Nolan MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2023.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Timely access to a lead trauma hospital (LTH) saves lives; however, the vast geography of Northern Ontario creates a barrier to equitable access to an LTH. Paramedics in Ontario follow the field trauma triage standard (FTTS) to identify which patients should be directly brought to an LTH. A pilot project was launched using a fixed wing modified scene response (MSR) to transport patients from Northern Ontario who met the FTTS directly to an LTH. This study aimed to 1) explore the impact of the fixed wing MSR pilot program on the time to LTH arrival for injured patients in Northern Ontario compared with the traditional interfacility transfer (IFT) process and 2) determine the frequency and specific FTTS criteria that were fulfilled.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cohort study<span> of injured patients in Northern Ontario who were emergently transported to an LTH by the provincial air ambulance service between January 2016 and October 2021. Electronic patient care records were manually reviewed, and patient cases were grouped by their sending and receiving facilities to evaluate time differences between MSR and IFT.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>For same-distance transports, the average time from injury to trauma center arrival was reduced with MSR (292.8 minutes) compared with IFT (507.8 minutes), with a mean difference of 130.3 minutes. All MSR cases and 90% of IFT cases met at least 1 FTTS criterion</span><em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Fixed wing MSR improves access to timely definitive care for injured patients in Northern Ontario, and all patients transported in this pilot project met the trauma bypass criteria.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X23002754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Timely access to a lead trauma hospital (LTH) saves lives; however, the vast geography of Northern Ontario creates a barrier to equitable access to an LTH. Paramedics in Ontario follow the field trauma triage standard (FTTS) to identify which patients should be directly brought to an LTH. A pilot project was launched using a fixed wing modified scene response (MSR) to transport patients from Northern Ontario who met the FTTS directly to an LTH. This study aimed to 1) explore the impact of the fixed wing MSR pilot program on the time to LTH arrival for injured patients in Northern Ontario compared with the traditional interfacility transfer (IFT) process and 2) determine the frequency and specific FTTS criteria that were fulfilled.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of injured patients in Northern Ontario who were emergently transported to an LTH by the provincial air ambulance service between January 2016 and October 2021. Electronic patient care records were manually reviewed, and patient cases were grouped by their sending and receiving facilities to evaluate time differences between MSR and IFT.

Results

For same-distance transports, the average time from injury to trauma center arrival was reduced with MSR (292.8 minutes) compared with IFT (507.8 minutes), with a mean difference of 130.3 minutes. All MSR cases and 90% of IFT cases met at least 1 FTTS criterion.

Conclusion

Fixed wing MSR improves access to timely definitive care for injured patients in Northern Ontario, and all patients transported in this pilot project met the trauma bypass criteria.

在安大略省北部对受伤病人使用固定翼改装现场空中救护:试点研究
目标及时前往创伤急救医院(LTH)可以挽救生命;然而,安大略省北部广阔的地理位置给公平前往创伤急救医院造成了障碍。安大略省的辅助医务人员遵循现场创伤分流标准(FTTS),以确定哪些病人应直接送往重症监护医院。安大略省启动了一个试点项目,使用固定翼改装现场响应(MSR)将安大略省北部符合现场创伤分流标准的病人直接送往长住区。本研究旨在:1)与传统的设施间转运(IFT)流程相比,探索固定翼MSR试点项目对安大略省北部受伤患者到达长距离医疗救护站时间的影响;2)确定满足FTTS标准的频率和具体标准。方法这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2016年1月至2021年10月期间由省级空中救护服务紧急送往长距离医疗救护站的安大略省北部受伤患者。研究人员对患者的电子护理记录进行了人工审核,并根据患者的发送和接收设施对患者病例进行了分组,以评估MSR和IFT之间的时间差异。结果对于相同距离的转运,MSR(292.8分钟)与IFT(507.8分钟)相比,从受伤到到达创伤中心的平均时间缩短了,平均差异为130.3分钟。所有 MSR 病例和 90% 的 IFT 病例均符合至少一项 FTTS 标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信