Inattentional Insensitivity As A Predictor of Relevant Situation Awareness Questions And Irrelevant Questions

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1177/21695067231221721

Andrew R. Dattel, Hui Wang, Sophie Chanoux, Cristhian Padilla, Haroon Jamanzi, Rochelle Potdar, Rajan Maroju, Tianxin Zhang, Pooja Amonkar

{"title":"Inattentional Insensitivity As A Predictor of Relevant Situation Awareness Questions And Irrelevant Questions","authors":"Andrew R. Dattel, Hui Wang, Sophie Chanoux, Cristhian Padilla, Haroon Jamanzi, Rochelle Potdar, Rajan Maroju, Tianxin Zhang, Pooja Amonkar","doi":"10.1177/21695067231221721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored predictors of situation awareness (SA) and predictors of irrelevant information in a complex task. Thirty-one participants were tested on personality, a little-known situation awareness test, working memory, inattentional blindness (IB), and inattentional insensitivity (IIS) as predictors of situation awareness and performance in a driving simulator. The two IIS conditions were visual (IB) and tactile. Participants were paid $25 for about a 1 ½ hour commitment. During the driving simulator scenario, participants answered 10 questions (half related to the driving task and half not critical to safe driving performance). More relevant questions were answered correctly than irrelevant questions. However, few predictors were shown for SA (relevant questions), but IB, and personality variables predicted response time for irrelevant questions. Tactile IIS was found to be better for performance on one of the SA tests and resulted in fewer errors in one of the tactile IIS tasks.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231221721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored predictors of situation awareness (SA) and predictors of irrelevant information in a complex task. Thirty-one participants were tested on personality, a little-known situation awareness test, working memory, inattentional blindness (IB), and inattentional insensitivity (IIS) as predictors of situation awareness and performance in a driving simulator. The two IIS conditions were visual (IB) and tactile. Participants were paid $25 for about a 1 ½ hour commitment. During the driving simulator scenario, participants answered 10 questions (half related to the driving task and half not critical to safe driving performance). More relevant questions were answered correctly than irrelevant questions. However, few predictors were shown for SA (relevant questions), but IB, and personality variables predicted response time for irrelevant questions. Tactile IIS was found to be better for performance on one of the SA tests and resulted in fewer errors in one of the tactile IIS tasks.

查看原文本刊更多论文

注意力不集中是相关情境认知问题和无关问题的预测因子

本研究探讨了复杂任务中情境意识（SA）的预测因素和无关信息的预测因素。31 名参与者在驾驶模拟器中接受了人格、鲜为人知的情境意识测试、工作记忆、注意力不集中盲点（IB）和注意力不集中不敏感（IIS）等情境意识和表现预测因素的测试。两种 IIS 条件分别是视觉（IB）和触觉。参与者的报酬为 25 美元，时间约为 1 个半小时。在模拟驾驶场景中，参与者回答了 10 个问题（一半与驾驶任务相关，一半与安全驾驶无关）。正确回答相关问题的人数多于回答无关问题的人数。然而，对 SA（相关问题）的预测因素很少，但对 IB 和人格变量却能预测无关问题的回答时间。在其中一项安全驾驶测试中，触觉综合信息系统的表现更好，在其中一项触觉综合信息系统任务中，错误率更低。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting

自引率

0.00%

发文量