How entrepreneurial team informational and social category faultlines affect new venture performance: A conservation of resources perspective

IF 5.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Feng Wei, Yongjun Mo, Yi Zhang, Yi Yang
{"title":"How entrepreneurial team informational and social category faultlines affect new venture performance: A conservation of resources perspective","authors":"Feng Wei,&nbsp;Yongjun Mo,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10490-024-09952-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The topic of entrepreneurial team faultlines has been gaining ground in entrepreneurship research, as it provides novel insights into the entrepreneurial team composition. However, our understanding of how entrepreneurial team faultlines affect new venture performance remains underdeveloped, especially concerning the different effects between informational and social category faultlines. Drawing on the challenge-hindrance stress framework and conservation of resources theory, we develop and test a model to explore the mechanisms underlying the effects of the two types of faultlines on new venture performance. On the one hand, informational faultlines, serving as initial resource gains, are positively associated with team-shared challenge stress, which in turn increases new venture performance in a sort of gain spiral. On the other hand, social category faultlines, serving as initial resource losses, are positively associated with team-shared hindrance stress, which in turn decreases new venture performance in a loss spiral. The results from 102 Chinese entrepreneurial teams comprising 399 members support our hypotheses. By clarifying the contrasting impacts of informational and social category faultlines within entrepreneurial teams and by revealing the mediating effects of team-shared stress, this study contributes to a better understanding of how entrepreneurial team composition and stress influence new venture performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8474,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","volume":"42 3","pages":"1345 - 1372"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10490-024-09952-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The topic of entrepreneurial team faultlines has been gaining ground in entrepreneurship research, as it provides novel insights into the entrepreneurial team composition. However, our understanding of how entrepreneurial team faultlines affect new venture performance remains underdeveloped, especially concerning the different effects between informational and social category faultlines. Drawing on the challenge-hindrance stress framework and conservation of resources theory, we develop and test a model to explore the mechanisms underlying the effects of the two types of faultlines on new venture performance. On the one hand, informational faultlines, serving as initial resource gains, are positively associated with team-shared challenge stress, which in turn increases new venture performance in a sort of gain spiral. On the other hand, social category faultlines, serving as initial resource losses, are positively associated with team-shared hindrance stress, which in turn decreases new venture performance in a loss spiral. The results from 102 Chinese entrepreneurial teams comprising 399 members support our hypotheses. By clarifying the contrasting impacts of informational and social category faultlines within entrepreneurial teams and by revealing the mediating effects of team-shared stress, this study contributes to a better understanding of how entrepreneurial team composition and stress influence new venture performance.

Abstract Image

创业团队的信息和社会类别断层如何影响新创企业的绩效:资源保护视角
创业团队断层这一主题在创业研究中越来越受欢迎,因为它为创业团队的构成提供了新的见解。然而,我们对创业团队断层线如何影响新创企业绩效的理解仍然不够充分,特别是关于信息和社会类别断层线之间的不同影响。利用挑战-障碍压力框架和资源保护理论,我们开发并测试了一个模型,以探索两种断层线对新创企业绩效影响的机制。一方面,作为初始资源收益的信息断层与团队共享的挑战压力呈正相关,这反过来又以一种收益螺旋的方式提高了新创企业的绩效。另一方面,作为初始资源损失的社会类别断层线与团队共享障碍压力正相关,从而在损失螺旋中降低新创企业绩效。来自102个中国创业团队的399名成员的结果支持了我们的假设。通过厘清创业团队内部信息断层和社会类别断层的对比影响,揭示团队共享压力的中介作用,本研究有助于更好地理解创业团队构成和压力对创业绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Management publishes original manuscripts on management and organizational research in the Asia Pacific region, encompassing Pacific Rim countries and mainland Asia. APJM focuses on the extent to which each manuscript addresses matters that pertain to the most fundamental question: “What determines organization success?” The major academic disciplines that we cover include entrepreneurship, human resource management, international business, organizational behavior, and strategic management. However, manuscripts that belong to other well-established disciplines such as accounting, economics, finance, marketing, and operations generally do not fall into the scope of APJM. We endeavor to be the major vehicle for exchange of ideas and research among management scholars within or interested in the broadly defined Asia Pacific region.Key features include: Rigor - maintained through strict review processes, high quality global reviewers, and Editorial Advisory and Review Boards comprising prominent researchers from many countries. Relevance - maintained by its focus on key management and organizational trends in the region. Uniqueness - being the first and most prominent management journal published in and about the fastest growing region in the world. Official affiliation - Asia Academy of ManagementFor more information, visit the AAOM website:www.baf.cuhk.edu.hk/asia-aom/ Officially cited as: Asia Pac J Manag
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信