Current clinical opinion on surgical approaches and rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon injury—a questionnaire study

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ruikang Xue, Jason Wong, Angela Imere, Heather King, Peter Clegg, Sarah Cartmell
{"title":"Current clinical opinion on surgical approaches and rehabilitation of hand flexor tendon injury—a questionnaire study","authors":"Ruikang Xue, Jason Wong, Angela Imere, Heather King, Peter Clegg, Sarah Cartmell","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1269861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of flexor tendon injury has seen many iterations over the years, but more substantial innovations in practice have been sadly lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of flexor tendon injury management, and variation in practice from the previous reports, most troublesome complications, and whether there was a clinical interest in potential innovative tendon repair technologies. An online survey was distributed via the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and a total of 132 responses were collected anonymously. Results showed that although most surgeons followed the current medical recommendation based on the literature, a significant number of surgeons still employed more conventional treatments in clinic, such as general anesthesia, ineffective tendon retrieval techniques, and passive rehabilitation. Complications including adhesion formation and re-rupture remained persistent. The interest in new approaches such as use of minimally invasive instruments, biodegradable materials and additive manufactured devices was not strong, however the surgeons were potentially open to more effective and economic solutions.","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1269861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of flexor tendon injury has seen many iterations over the years, but more substantial innovations in practice have been sadly lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of flexor tendon injury management, and variation in practice from the previous reports, most troublesome complications, and whether there was a clinical interest in potential innovative tendon repair technologies. An online survey was distributed via the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and a total of 132 responses were collected anonymously. Results showed that although most surgeons followed the current medical recommendation based on the literature, a significant number of surgeons still employed more conventional treatments in clinic, such as general anesthesia, ineffective tendon retrieval techniques, and passive rehabilitation. Complications including adhesion formation and re-rupture remained persistent. The interest in new approaches such as use of minimally invasive instruments, biodegradable materials and additive manufactured devices was not strong, however the surgeons were potentially open to more effective and economic solutions.
关于手部屈肌腱损伤的手术方法和康复的当前临床观点--问卷调查研究
多年来,屈肌腱损伤的治疗经历了多次反复,但令人遗憾的是,在实践中一直缺乏更多实质性的创新。本研究旨在调查目前屈肌腱损伤的处理方法、与以往报告的不同之处、最棘手的并发症,以及临床上是否对潜在的创新肌腱修复技术感兴趣。英国手外科学会(BSSH)发布了一份在线调查,共收集到132份匿名回复。结果显示,虽然大多数外科医生都遵循了当前基于文献的医学建议,但仍有相当数量的外科医生在临床上采用了更为传统的治疗方法,如全身麻醉、无效的肌腱回纳技术和被动康复。包括粘连形成和再次断裂在内的并发症仍然持续存在。外科医生对使用微创器械、生物可降解材料和添加剂制造设备等新方法的兴趣并不浓厚,但他们有可能对更有效、更经济的解决方案持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信