Pilot testing of mobile app-based blended learning on selected skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among nursing students

Poonam Joshi, Smita Das, S. Mawar, L. Gopichandran, Rakesh Garg, Rashmi Ramachandran, Ambuj Roy
{"title":"Pilot testing of mobile app-based blended learning on selected skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among nursing students","authors":"Poonam Joshi, Smita Das, S. Mawar, L. Gopichandran, Rakesh Garg, Rashmi Ramachandran, Ambuj Roy","doi":"10.25259/nmji_659_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a skill-oriented training programme required to be practised and updated periodically by every healthcare provider.\n\n\n\nIn an open-label randomized controlled trial, 81 fourth-year BSc Nursing students were randomized to experimental (n=41) and control (n=40) groups using a computer-generated table. The learning resource material was shared through a mobile-app with the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) received the internet link for retrieving the learning resource material, 4 days before a 1-day training programme. Baseline knowledge and skills assessment of the students was done before the commencement of the training programme, using a pre-validated self-developed questionnaire based on standardized CPR guidelines of professional bodies. Post-intervention assessment of knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction of the students with the training methodology was done at the end of the training programme. The confidence and satisfaction of the students with the training methodology were assessed using a standardized confidence scale and a self-developed satisfaction scale, respectively.\n\n\n\nThe baseline knowledge and skills scores of the students were comparable (EG v. CG, knowledge: 16.04 [2.35] v. 15.52 [2.69], p=0.34; skill: 13.41 [5.28] v. 15.02 [4.66], p=0.16). A comparable improvement was seen in post-intervention knowledge and skills scores between the groups (EG v. CG, knowledge 17.78 [1.49] v. 17.70 [1.51], p=0.82; skill 29.85 [2.44] v. 30.08 [2.79], p=0.60). The post-intervention confidence in performing the skills (20.22 [2.76] v. 19.41 [3.63], p=0.331) and satisfaction with the method of dissemination of educational resource material (29.85 [2.4] v. 30.08 [2.79], p=0.73) were also comparable in both the groups.\n\n\n\nBoth mobile app-based and internet link-based learning resource material along with hands-on sessions were effective in bringing comparable improvement in knowledge, skills, self-confidence and satisfaction of students in performing the selected skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.\n","PeriodicalId":201890,"journal":{"name":"The National Medical Journal of India","volume":"720 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National Medical Journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/nmji_659_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a skill-oriented training programme required to be practised and updated periodically by every healthcare provider. In an open-label randomized controlled trial, 81 fourth-year BSc Nursing students were randomized to experimental (n=41) and control (n=40) groups using a computer-generated table. The learning resource material was shared through a mobile-app with the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) received the internet link for retrieving the learning resource material, 4 days before a 1-day training programme. Baseline knowledge and skills assessment of the students was done before the commencement of the training programme, using a pre-validated self-developed questionnaire based on standardized CPR guidelines of professional bodies. Post-intervention assessment of knowledge, skills, confidence and satisfaction of the students with the training methodology was done at the end of the training programme. The confidence and satisfaction of the students with the training methodology were assessed using a standardized confidence scale and a self-developed satisfaction scale, respectively. The baseline knowledge and skills scores of the students were comparable (EG v. CG, knowledge: 16.04 [2.35] v. 15.52 [2.69], p=0.34; skill: 13.41 [5.28] v. 15.02 [4.66], p=0.16). A comparable improvement was seen in post-intervention knowledge and skills scores between the groups (EG v. CG, knowledge 17.78 [1.49] v. 17.70 [1.51], p=0.82; skill 29.85 [2.44] v. 30.08 [2.79], p=0.60). The post-intervention confidence in performing the skills (20.22 [2.76] v. 19.41 [3.63], p=0.331) and satisfaction with the method of dissemination of educational resource material (29.85 [2.4] v. 30.08 [2.79], p=0.73) were also comparable in both the groups. Both mobile app-based and internet link-based learning resource material along with hands-on sessions were effective in bringing comparable improvement in knowledge, skills, self-confidence and satisfaction of students in performing the selected skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
基于移动应用程序的混合式学习对护理专业学生心肺复苏特定技能的试点测试
心肺复苏术(CPR)是一项以技能为导向的培训项目,要求每位医护人员定期练习和更新。在一项开放标签随机对照试验中,81 名四年级护理学学士学生通过计算机生成的表格被随机分为实验组(41 人)和对照组(40 人)。实验组(EG)通过移动应用程序共享学习资源材料,对照组(CG)在为期一天的培训课程开始前 4 天收到用于检索学习资源材料的互联网链接。在培训课程开始前,根据专业机构的标准化心肺复苏指南,使用预先验证的自行开发的问卷对学生进行了基线知识和技能评估。培训课程结束后,对学员的知识、技能、信心和对培训方法的满意度进行了干预后评估。学员的基线知识和技能得分相当(EG 对 CG,知识:16.04 [2.35] 对 15.52 [2.69],P=0.34;技能:13.41 [5.28] 对 15.02 [4.66],P=0.16)。两组在干预后的知识和技能得分提高幅度相当(EG 对 CG,知识:17.78 [1.49] 对 17.70 [1.51],p=0.82;技能:29.85 [2.44] 对 30.08 [2.79],p=0.60)。干预后,两组对掌握技能的信心(20.22 [2.76] v. 19.41 [3.63],p=0.331)和对教育资源材料传播方式的满意度(29.85 [2.4] v. 30.08 [2.79],p=0.73)也相当。无论是基于移动应用程序的学习资源材料还是基于互联网链接的学习资源材料,再加上实践课程,都能有效地提高学生在掌握心肺复苏选定技能方面的知识、技能、自信心和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信