Social media posts as source for political news coverage inside and outside election campaigns: Examining effects on deliberative news media quality

Corinna Oschatz, T. Gil-López, Dylan Paltra, Sebastian Stier, Tanjev Schultz
{"title":"Social media posts as source for political news coverage inside and outside election campaigns: Examining effects on deliberative news media quality","authors":"Corinna Oschatz, T. Gil-López, Dylan Paltra, Sebastian Stier, Tanjev Schultz","doi":"10.1177/14648849241231698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journalists increasingly cite and/or embed social media posts in news articles. While social media posts have been found to be of little deliberative quality, we do not know whether this also affects the deliberative quality of the news. Against the background of a hybrid media system and deliberative news media standards, we answer this research question with a content analysis of news articles including or not including posts from X (formerly Twitter) in the twelve widest-reaching German news websites prior and after the German general election 2021. We were particularly interested in the differences inside and outside election campaigns as the interdependence of the mass media and the political sphere is particularly pronounced during campaign periods. Results show that posts are more often cited and/or embedded in news articles inside than outside election campaigns. Articles including posts feature a greater number of actors but are not more diverse as mainly actors from the political center are referenced. Moreover, articles with posts are associated with a higher position responsiveness but on the other hand a decreased civility of the represented political discourse. This pattern only emerged inside but not outside campaign periods. These findings add to our understanding of contemporary hybrid media systems and the nature of political journalism during contentious political periods.","PeriodicalId":506068,"journal":{"name":"Journalism","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241231698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Journalists increasingly cite and/or embed social media posts in news articles. While social media posts have been found to be of little deliberative quality, we do not know whether this also affects the deliberative quality of the news. Against the background of a hybrid media system and deliberative news media standards, we answer this research question with a content analysis of news articles including or not including posts from X (formerly Twitter) in the twelve widest-reaching German news websites prior and after the German general election 2021. We were particularly interested in the differences inside and outside election campaigns as the interdependence of the mass media and the political sphere is particularly pronounced during campaign periods. Results show that posts are more often cited and/or embedded in news articles inside than outside election campaigns. Articles including posts feature a greater number of actors but are not more diverse as mainly actors from the political center are referenced. Moreover, articles with posts are associated with a higher position responsiveness but on the other hand a decreased civility of the represented political discourse. This pattern only emerged inside but not outside campaign periods. These findings add to our understanding of contemporary hybrid media systems and the nature of political journalism during contentious political periods.
社交媒体帖子作为竞选活动内外政治新闻报道的来源:考察对审议型新闻媒体质量的影响
记者越来越多地在新闻文章中引用和/或嵌入社交媒体帖子。虽然人们发现社交媒体帖子的审议质量不高,但我们不知道这是否也会影响新闻的审议质量。在混合媒体系统和商议性新闻媒体标准的背景下,我们通过对 2021 年德国大选前后 12 家影响力最大的德国新闻网站中包含或不包含来自 X(原 Twitter)的帖子的新闻文章进行内容分析,回答了这一研究问题。我们尤其关注竞选活动内外的差异,因为在竞选期间,大众媒体与政治领域的相互依存关系尤为明显。结果显示,在竞选活动期间,帖子被引用和/或嵌入新闻文章的频率高于竞选活动之外。包含帖子的文章有更多的参与者,但并不更多样化,因为主要引用的是政治中心的参与者。此外,带有帖子的文章与更高的立场响应度有关,但另一方面却降低了所代表的政治话语的文明程度。这种模式只出现在竞选期间,而非竞选期间。这些发现加深了我们对当代混合媒体系统以及政治争议时期政治新闻性质的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信