Derivative-free search approaches for optimization of well inflow control valves and controls

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mathias C. Bellout, Thiago L. Silva, Jan Øystein Haavig Bakke, Carl Fredrik Berg
{"title":"Derivative-free search approaches for optimization of well inflow control valves and controls","authors":"Mathias C. Bellout, Thiago L. Silva, Jan Øystein Haavig Bakke, Carl Fredrik Berg","doi":"10.1007/s10596-024-10270-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Decisions regarding problem conceptualization, search approach, and how best to parametrize optimization methods for practical application are key to successful implementation of optimization approaches within georesources field development projects. This work provides decision support regarding the application of derivative-free search approaches for concurrent optimization of inflow control valves (ICVs) and well controls. A set of state-of-the-art approaches possessing different search features is implemented over two reference cases, and their performance, resource requirements, and specific method configurations are compared across multiple problem formulations for completion design. In this study, problem formulations to optimize completion design comprise fixed ICVs and piecewise-constant well controls. The design is optimized by several derivative-free methodologies relying on parallel pattern-search (<b>t</b>APPS), population-based stochastic sampling (<b>t</b>PSO) and trust-region interpolation-based models (<b>t</b>DFTR). These methodologies are tested on a heterogeneous two-dimensional case and on a realistic case based on a section of the Olympus benchmark model. Three problem formulations are applied in both cases, i.e., one formulation optimizes ICV settings only, while two joint configurations also treat producer and injector controls as variables. Various method parametrizations across the range of cases and problem formulations exploit the different search features to improve convergence, achieve final objectives and infer response surface features. The scope of this particular study treats only deterministic problem formulations. Results outline performance trade-offs between parallelizable algorithms (<b>t</b>APPS, <b>t</b>PSO) with high total runtime search efficiency and the local-search trust-region approach (<b>t</b>DFTR) providing effective objective gains for a low number of cost function evaluations. <b>t</b>APPS demonstrates robust performance across different problem formulations that can support exploration efforts, e.g., during a pre-drill design phase while multiple independent <b>t</b>DFTR runs can provide local tuning capability around established solutions in a time-constrained post-drill setting. Additional remarks regarding joint completion design optimization, comparison metrics, and relative algorithm performance given the varying problem formulations are also made.</p>","PeriodicalId":10662,"journal":{"name":"Computational Geosciences","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-024-10270-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decisions regarding problem conceptualization, search approach, and how best to parametrize optimization methods for practical application are key to successful implementation of optimization approaches within georesources field development projects. This work provides decision support regarding the application of derivative-free search approaches for concurrent optimization of inflow control valves (ICVs) and well controls. A set of state-of-the-art approaches possessing different search features is implemented over two reference cases, and their performance, resource requirements, and specific method configurations are compared across multiple problem formulations for completion design. In this study, problem formulations to optimize completion design comprise fixed ICVs and piecewise-constant well controls. The design is optimized by several derivative-free methodologies relying on parallel pattern-search (tAPPS), population-based stochastic sampling (tPSO) and trust-region interpolation-based models (tDFTR). These methodologies are tested on a heterogeneous two-dimensional case and on a realistic case based on a section of the Olympus benchmark model. Three problem formulations are applied in both cases, i.e., one formulation optimizes ICV settings only, while two joint configurations also treat producer and injector controls as variables. Various method parametrizations across the range of cases and problem formulations exploit the different search features to improve convergence, achieve final objectives and infer response surface features. The scope of this particular study treats only deterministic problem formulations. Results outline performance trade-offs between parallelizable algorithms (tAPPS, tPSO) with high total runtime search efficiency and the local-search trust-region approach (tDFTR) providing effective objective gains for a low number of cost function evaluations. tAPPS demonstrates robust performance across different problem formulations that can support exploration efforts, e.g., during a pre-drill design phase while multiple independent tDFTR runs can provide local tuning capability around established solutions in a time-constrained post-drill setting. Additional remarks regarding joint completion design optimization, comparison metrics, and relative algorithm performance given the varying problem formulations are also made.

优化油井导流控制阀和控制装置的无衍生搜索方法
在地质资源领域开发项目中成功实施优化方法的关键在于问题概念化、搜索方法以及如何为实际应用优化方法设定最佳参数。这项工作为应用无衍生搜索方法同时优化流入控制阀(ICV)和油井控制提供了决策支持。在两个参考案例中实施了一套具有不同搜索特征的先进方法,并在完井设计的多个问题公式中对其性能、资源需求和具体方法配置进行了比较。在这项研究中,优化完井设计的问题公式包括固定的 ICV 和片断恒定的井控。设计通过几种无衍生方法进行优化,这些方法依赖于并行模式搜索(tAPPS)、基于群体的随机抽样(tPSO)和基于信任区域插值模型(tDFTR)。这些方法在一个异构二维案例和一个基于奥林巴斯基准模型部分的现实案例中进行了测试。两种情况下都采用了三种问题公式,即一种公式只优化 ICV 设置,而两种联合配置也将生产者和喷射器控制作为变量。在各种情况和问题公式中,各种方法参数化利用了不同的搜索特征,以提高收敛性、实现最终目标并推断响应面特征。本研究仅涉及确定性问题的表述。结果概述了具有高总运行时间搜索效率的可并行算法(tAPPS、tPSO)与在低成本函数评估次数下提供有效目标增益的局部搜索信任区域方法(tDFTR)之间的性能权衡。tAPPS 在不同的问题公式中表现出稳健的性能,可以支持探索工作,例如在钻井前设计阶段,而多个独立的 tDFTR 运行可以在时间受限的钻井后环境中围绕既定解决方案提供局部调整能力。此外,还对联合完井设计优化、比较指标以及不同问题表述下的相对算法性能进行了补充说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Geosciences
Computational Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational Geosciences publishes high quality papers on mathematical modeling, simulation, numerical analysis, and other computational aspects of the geosciences. In particular the journal is focused on advanced numerical methods for the simulation of subsurface flow and transport, and associated aspects such as discretization, gridding, upscaling, optimization, data assimilation, uncertainty assessment, and high performance parallel and grid computing. Papers treating similar topics but with applications to other fields in the geosciences, such as geomechanics, geophysics, oceanography, or meteorology, will also be considered. The journal provides a platform for interaction and multidisciplinary collaboration among diverse scientific groups, from both academia and industry, which share an interest in developing mathematical models and efficient algorithms for solving them, such as mathematicians, engineers, chemists, physicists, and geoscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信