Models of Building a Faculty: Institutional Transformation and the Disruption of the Professoriate in Public Higher Education

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Innovative Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s10755-024-09699-4

Barrett Taylor, Karri Holley

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores patterns in the US professoriate and the relationship to institutional wealth and status in public higher education, 2012–2021. We use latent profile analysis to identify different models for building a faculty and multinomial logistic regression to describe the characteristics of institutions employing these models. The results describe the human toll of the financial disruptions facing American public higher education. The findings suggest that changes to the faculty have been widespread but uneven.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

师资队伍建设模式：公立高等教育机构的转型与教授制度的瓦解

本文探讨了 2012-2021 年美国教授队伍的模式以及与公立高等教育机构财富和地位的关系。我们使用潜在特征分析来确定不同的师资队伍建设模式，并使用多项式逻辑回归来描述采用这些模式的院校的特征。研究结果描述了美国公立高等教育所面临的财务混乱所造成的人员损失。研究结果表明，师资队伍的变化是普遍的，但也是不均衡的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Innovative Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Innovative Higher Education is a refereed scholarly journal that strives to package fresh ideas in higher education in a straightforward and readable fashion. The four main purposes of Innovative Higher Education are: (1) to present descriptions and evaluations of current innovations and provocative new ideas with relevance for action beyond the immediate context in higher education; (2) to focus on the effect of such innovations on teaching and students; (3) to be open to diverse forms of scholarship and research methods by maintaining flexibility in the selection of topics deemed appropriate for the journal; and (4) to strike a balance between practice and theory by presenting manuscripts in a readable and scholarly manner to both faculty and administrators in the academic community.