Alkaloids in Isatis indigotica and their chemotaxonomic significance

IF 1.4 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2024.104800

Yu-Fei Qiu , Qi Jia , Shao-Jiang Song , Xiao-Bo Wang

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Isatis indigotica Fort., belongs to the Brassicaceae family and its leaf is an important Chinese traditional folklore medicine. After many years of research, phytochemical investigations on it have led to the identification of 197 alkaloids, which could serve as valuable chemotaxonomic markers for the identification of I. indigotica. We summarize the chemotaxonomic value of alkaloids, and the results showed that I. indigotica is a typical species in the Brassicaceae family. It has some chemotaxonomic relationships with genera of Brassica L., Arabidopsis (DC.) Heynh., Thellungiella O. E. Schulz, Raphanus L., Lepidium L., together with families of Acanthaceae, Apocynaceae, Nitrariaceae, Orchidaceae and Orchidoideae.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Isatis indigotica 中的生物碱及其化学分类学意义

Isatis indigotica Fort.属于芸香科植物，其叶子是一种重要的中国传统民间药材。经过多年的研究，植物化学研究已鉴定出 197 种生物碱，这些生物碱可作为鉴定 Isatis indigotica 的有价值的化学分类标记。我们总结了生物碱的化学分类学价值，结果表明 I. indigotica 是十字花科的一个典型物种。它与芸薹属（Brassica L.）、拟南芥属（Arabidopsis (DC.) Heynh.E. Schulz、Raphanus L.、Lepidium L.，以及刺桐科、芹菜科、荨麻科、兰科和兰花科有一定的化学分类学关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.