Noninvasive Neuromodulation Combined With Rehabilitation Therapy Improves Balance and Gait Speed in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Anamon Tangjade, Areerat Suputtitada, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni
{"title":"Noninvasive Neuromodulation Combined With Rehabilitation Therapy Improves Balance and Gait Speed in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.","authors":"Anamon Tangjade, Areerat Suputtitada, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation affect functional balance, gait speed, and walking cadence in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus (June 22, 2022) for randomized controlled trials. Three reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were performed to assess indirect and direct comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 34 studies ( N = 915 patients). Sixty percent had moderate-to-high methodological quality. The meta-analyses showed positive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy compared with sham on gait speed, walking cadence, and balance function with weighted mean differences and 95% confidence interval of 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13), 7.16 (3.217 to 11.103), and 3.05 (0.52 to 5.57), respectively. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed improvement on the time up and go test (-0.88 [-1.68 to -0.08]). From the surface under the cumulative ranking analyses, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is the best ranked treatment for gait speed and functional balance improvement compared with transcranial direct current stimulation and sham interventions. There were not enough studies to include cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Walking cadence and speed, functional balance significantly improved after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with short-term effects, which were superior to that of transcranial direct current stimulation and sham treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed short-term beneficial effects on the Time Up and Go test.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"789-796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002439","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation affect functional balance, gait speed, and walking cadence in stroke patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus (June 22, 2022) for randomized controlled trials. Three reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network and pairwise meta-analyses were performed to assess indirect and direct comparisons.

Results: We included 34 studies ( N = 915 patients). Sixty percent had moderate-to-high methodological quality. The meta-analyses showed positive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with rehabilitation therapy compared with sham on gait speed, walking cadence, and balance function with weighted mean differences and 95% confidence interval of 0.08 (0.03 to 0.13), 7.16 (3.217 to 11.103), and 3.05 (0.52 to 5.57), respectively. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed improvement on the time up and go test (-0.88 [-1.68 to -0.08]). From the surface under the cumulative ranking analyses, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is the best ranked treatment for gait speed and functional balance improvement compared with transcranial direct current stimulation and sham interventions. There were not enough studies to include cranial nerve noninvasive neuromodulation in the meta-analysis.

Conclusions: Walking cadence and speed, functional balance significantly improved after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with short-term effects, which were superior to that of transcranial direct current stimulation and sham treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation showed short-term beneficial effects on the Time Up and Go test.

非侵入性神经调控与康复治疗相结合可改善中风患者的平衡能力和步速:系统综述与网络 Meta 分析》。
研究目的本研究旨在确定重复经颅磁刺激[rTMS]、经颅直流电刺激[tDCS]和颅神经无创神经调控[CN-NINM]对脑卒中患者功能平衡、步态速度和行走节奏的影响:我们检索了 PUBMED、EMBASE、COCHRANE 和 SCOPUS(2022 年 6 月 22 日)的随机对照试验。三名审稿人独立进行数据提取并评估偏倚风险。进行网络分析和配对荟萃分析以评估间接和直接比较:我们纳入了 34 项研究(n = 915 名患者)。60%的研究具有中等至高等的方法学质量。荟萃分析显示,与假治疗相比,经颅磁刺激联合康复治疗对步速、行走节奏和平衡功能有积极影响,加权平均差和 95% 置信区间分别为 0.08,[0.03-0.13];7.16,[3.217-11.103];和 3.05,[0.52-5.57]。从 SUCRA 分析结果来看,与 tDCS 和假干预相比,经颅磁刺激是改善步态速度和功能平衡的最佳疗法。没有足够的研究将 CN-NINM 纳入荟萃分析:结论:经颅磁刺激治疗后,步行的步幅和速度、功能平衡在短期内得到明显改善,其效果优于 tDCS 和假治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信