Race, ethnicity, and ancestry reporting in genetic counseling research: A focused mapping review and synthesis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Marta Arpone, Erin Turbitt, Alison McEwen
{"title":"Race, ethnicity, and ancestry reporting in genetic counseling research: A focused mapping review and synthesis.","authors":"Marta Arpone, Erin Turbitt, Alison McEwen","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies on the use of Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry (REA) concepts and terms in genetic research are limited. We aimed to describe the collection, reporting, and use of REA data in genetic counseling research. We undertook a focused mapping review and synthesis of the Journal of Genetic Counseling 2021 publications. We used a mapping proforma based on the Race, Ethnicity, And Culture in Health checklist to extract data. Of the 177 screened articles, 132 met our inclusion criteria of reporting primary data about participants. The sample REA characteristics were described in 80 (61%) articles, with 6% providing a definition or conceptualization of the REA term/s used and 23% including a rationale for their study in terms of REA factors. Group labels were most often reported using population descriptors, such as \"race,\" \"ethnicity,\" \"race/ethnicity,\" and \"ancestry.\" Several group labels were used under different population descriptors. For instance, the group labels \"White\" and \"Asian\" were used under all population descriptors. Most studies (79%) ascertained REA characteristics by participants' self-report. Three (15%) of the 20 qualitative studies mentioned the relevance of the interviewers' REA characteristics in relation to the participants' REA characteristics. Of the 55 quantitative studies, 19 (35%) used REA factors in the data analysis. Of the 80 articles describing the sample REA characteristics, 20% referred moderately or a great deal to any REA factors in the results interpretation, 46% acknowledged the REA factors in the study limitations, and 15% discussed the implications of REA reporting for genetic counseling practice. Our review documents extensive variation in how sample REA characteristics are described and used in genetic counseling research. Our findings provide a baseline against which to evaluate the effects of guidelines and recommendations for the collection, responsible use, and report of participants' REA characteristics in genetic counseling research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on the use of Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry (REA) concepts and terms in genetic research are limited. We aimed to describe the collection, reporting, and use of REA data in genetic counseling research. We undertook a focused mapping review and synthesis of the Journal of Genetic Counseling 2021 publications. We used a mapping proforma based on the Race, Ethnicity, And Culture in Health checklist to extract data. Of the 177 screened articles, 132 met our inclusion criteria of reporting primary data about participants. The sample REA characteristics were described in 80 (61%) articles, with 6% providing a definition or conceptualization of the REA term/s used and 23% including a rationale for their study in terms of REA factors. Group labels were most often reported using population descriptors, such as "race," "ethnicity," "race/ethnicity," and "ancestry." Several group labels were used under different population descriptors. For instance, the group labels "White" and "Asian" were used under all population descriptors. Most studies (79%) ascertained REA characteristics by participants' self-report. Three (15%) of the 20 qualitative studies mentioned the relevance of the interviewers' REA characteristics in relation to the participants' REA characteristics. Of the 55 quantitative studies, 19 (35%) used REA factors in the data analysis. Of the 80 articles describing the sample REA characteristics, 20% referred moderately or a great deal to any REA factors in the results interpretation, 46% acknowledged the REA factors in the study limitations, and 15% discussed the implications of REA reporting for genetic counseling practice. Our review documents extensive variation in how sample REA characteristics are described and used in genetic counseling research. Our findings provide a baseline against which to evaluate the effects of guidelines and recommendations for the collection, responsible use, and report of participants' REA characteristics in genetic counseling research.

遗传咨询研究中的种族、民族和祖先报告:重点图谱回顾与综述。
关于在遗传研究中使用种族、民族和祖先(REA)概念和术语的研究十分有限。我们旨在描述遗传咨询研究中 REA 数据的收集、报告和使用情况。我们对《遗传咨询杂志》(Journal of Genetic Counseling)2021 年的出版物进行了一次有重点的绘图审查和综合。我们使用基于 "健康中的种族、民族和文化 "清单的绘图表格来提取数据。在筛选出的 177 篇文章中,有 132 篇符合我们的纳入标准,即报告了参与者的主要数据。有 80 篇(61%)文章对样本的 REA 特征进行了描述,其中 6% 的文章提供了所使用的 REA 术语的定义或概念,23% 的文章从 REA 因素的角度阐述了其研究的理由。群体标签最常使用人口描述词进行报告,如 "种族"、"民族"、"种族/民族 "和 "血统"。在不同的人口描述中使用了多个群体标签。例如,"白人 "和 "亚裔 "这两个群体标签在所有人口描述符下都被使用。大多数研究(79%)通过参与者的自我报告来确定 REA 的特征。在 20 项定性研究中,有 3 项(15%)提到了访问者的 REA 特征与参与者的 REA 特征之间的相关性。在 55 项定量研究中,有 19 项(35%)在数据分析中使用了 REA 因素。在描述样本 REA 特征的 80 篇文章中,20% 的文章在结果解释中适度或大量提及了任何 REA 因素,46% 的文章在研究限制中承认了 REA 因素,15% 的文章讨论了 REA 报告对遗传咨询实践的影响。我们的综述记录了遗传咨询研究中如何描述和使用样本 REA 特征的广泛差异。我们的研究结果为评估遗传咨询研究中收集、负责任地使用和报告参与者 REA 特征的指南和建议的效果提供了一个基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信