Clinical application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2313123
Ashraf N H Gerges, Ellen E R Williams, Susan Hillier, Jeric Uy, Taya Hamilton, Saran Chamberlain, Brenton Hordacre
{"title":"Clinical application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review.","authors":"Ashraf N H Gerges, Ellen E R Williams, Susan Hillier, Jeric Uy, Taya Hamilton, Saran Chamberlain, Brenton Hordacre","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2313123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation therapy. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic use of taVNS, optimal stimulation parameters, effective sham protocols, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted. Five databases and grey literature were searched. The data extracted included stimulation parameters, adverse events (AEs), and therapeutic effects on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>109 studies were included. taVNS was used across 21 different clinical populations, most commonly in psychiatric, cardiac, and neurological disorders. Overall, 2,214 adults received active taVNS and 1,017 received sham taVNS. Reporting of stimulation parameters was limited and inconsistent. taVNS appeared to have a favourable therapeutic effect across a wide range of clinical populations with varied parameters. Three sham protocols were reported but their effectiveness was documented in only two of the 54 sham-controlled studies. Most reported adverse events were localised to stimulation site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is growing evidence for taVNS therapeutic effect. taVNS appears safe and tolerable. Sham protocols need evaluation. Standardised and comprehensive reporting of both stimulation parameters and adverse events is required. Two different questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate adverse events and the effectiveness of sham methods in blinding participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5730-5760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2313123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation therapy. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic use of taVNS, optimal stimulation parameters, effective sham protocols, and safety.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Five databases and grey literature were searched. The data extracted included stimulation parameters, adverse events (AEs), and therapeutic effects on clinical outcomes.

Results: 109 studies were included. taVNS was used across 21 different clinical populations, most commonly in psychiatric, cardiac, and neurological disorders. Overall, 2,214 adults received active taVNS and 1,017 received sham taVNS. Reporting of stimulation parameters was limited and inconsistent. taVNS appeared to have a favourable therapeutic effect across a wide range of clinical populations with varied parameters. Three sham protocols were reported but their effectiveness was documented in only two of the 54 sham-controlled studies. Most reported adverse events were localised to stimulation site.

Conclusion: There is growing evidence for taVNS therapeutic effect. taVNS appears safe and tolerable. Sham protocols need evaluation. Standardised and comprehensive reporting of both stimulation parameters and adverse events is required. Two different questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate adverse events and the effectiveness of sham methods in blinding participants.

经皮耳迷走神经刺激的临床应用:范围综述。
目的:经皮耳廓迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是一种新兴的非侵入性神经调节疗法。本研究旨在探讨 taVNS 的治疗用途、最佳刺激参数、有效的假方案和安全性:方法:进行了范围综述。方法:进行了范围综述,检索了五个数据库和灰色文献。结果:共纳入 109 项研究:TaVNS用于21种不同的临床人群,最常见的是精神病、心脏病和神经系统疾病。共有 2,214 名成人接受了活性 taVNS 治疗,1,017 人接受了假性 taVNS 治疗。关于刺激参数的报告有限且不一致。在参数各异的广泛临床人群中,taVNS 似乎具有良好的治疗效果。在 54 项假对照研究中,有三项假方案被报道,但只有两项记录了其有效性。大多数报告的不良事件都发生在刺激部位:越来越多的证据表明 taVNS 具有治疗效果。需要对模拟方案进行评估。需要对刺激参数和不良事件进行标准化的全面报告。已提出两种不同的调查问卷,用于评估不良事件和遮蔽参与者的假象方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信