Co-construction d’une étude sur la santé des Gens du voyage : retours d’expériences.

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Aude Mondeilh, Lisbeth Spanjers, Gilles Brabant, Frédérique Quirino Chaves, Stéphane Lévêque, Laurent El Ghozi, Christine Castor, Erwan Autès-Tréand, Stéphanie Vandentorren
{"title":"Co-construction d’une étude sur la santé des Gens du voyage : retours d’expériences.","authors":"Aude Mondeilh, Lisbeth Spanjers, Gilles Brabant, Frédérique Quirino Chaves, Stéphane Lévêque, Laurent El Ghozi, Christine Castor, Erwan Autès-Tréand, Stéphanie Vandentorren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Travelers have poorer health than the general population due to more precarious living conditions. In France, there are no epidemiological studies on Travelers, accentuating their invisibility in public health policy and planning. Discrimination against them, their distrust of the state and institutions, and their non-prioritization of health were the reasons for a participatory research project on Travelers&#8217; health status. This research was carried out collaboratively by researchers, decision-makers, associations, and volunteer Travelers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.</p><p><strong>Purpose of research: </strong>In this article we aim to share the challenges and benefits of the co-construction of this research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The approach allowed the specific and sometimes divergent expectations of the stakeholders to be expressed and taken into consideration. It required a period of mutual acculturation, which resulted in a high level of participation in the study (74 percent), the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and the identification of points of contention. This participatory approach led to a better appropriation of the study and a greater awareness of health issues among the respondents, particularly thanks to the co-construction of the questionnaire and the communication tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This approach highlights the need to involve stakeholders in the governance of the research project from the very beginning. The approach was all the more crucial as it involved socially excluded people, and aims to avoid the possibility of excluding them further in the production of knowledge that concerns them.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Travelers have poorer health than the general population due to more precarious living conditions. In France, there are no epidemiological studies on Travelers, accentuating their invisibility in public health policy and planning. Discrimination against them, their distrust of the state and institutions, and their non-prioritization of health were the reasons for a participatory research project on Travelers’ health status. This research was carried out collaboratively by researchers, decision-makers, associations, and volunteer Travelers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine.

Purpose of research: In this article we aim to share the challenges and benefits of the co-construction of this research.

Results: The approach allowed the specific and sometimes divergent expectations of the stakeholders to be expressed and taken into consideration. It required a period of mutual acculturation, which resulted in a high level of participation in the study (74 percent), the acquisition of knowledge and skills, and the identification of points of contention. This participatory approach led to a better appropriation of the study and a greater awareness of health issues among the respondents, particularly thanks to the co-construction of the questionnaire and the communication tools.

Conclusions: This approach highlights the need to involve stakeholders in the governance of the research project from the very beginning. The approach was all the more crucial as it involved socially excluded people, and aims to avoid the possibility of excluding them further in the production of knowledge that concerns them.

共同开展游民健康研究:反馈意见。
导言:由于生活条件更不稳定,旅行者的健康状况比普通人更差。在法国,没有针对旅行者的流行病学研究,这使得他们在公共卫生政策和规划中更加不受重视。对他们的歧视、他们对国家和机构的不信任,以及他们对健康的不重视,是开展 "旅行者健康状况 "参与式研究项目的原因。这项研究由研究人员、决策者、协会和新阿基坦大区的旅行者志愿者共同完成:在这篇文章中,我们旨在分享共同构建这项研究的挑战和益处:结果:这一方法使利益相关者的具体、有时是不同的期望得以表达和考虑。这需要一段时间的相互适应,从而使研究的参与度很高(74%),获得了知识和技能,并确定了争议点。这种参与式方法使受访者更好地适应了研究,并提高了对健康问题的认识,特别是由于共同编制了调查问卷和交流工具:这种方法强调了从一开始就让利益相关者参与研究项目管理的必要性。这种方法的关键在于让被社会排斥的人参与进来,目的是避免在创造与他们有关的知识时进一步排斥他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信