Patient safety culture assessment before and after safety huddle implementation.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2024-02-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0270en
Márcio Venicio Alcântara de Moraes, Ítalo Lennon Sales de Almeida, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho
{"title":"Patient safety culture assessment before and after safety huddle implementation.","authors":"Márcio Venicio Alcântara de Moraes, Ítalo Lennon Sales de Almeida, Rhanna Emanuela Fontenele Lima de Carvalho","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0270en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify whether safety huddle implementation enabled a change in patient safety culture.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Quasi-experimental research that assessed patient safety culture before and after safety huddle implementation.</p><p><strong>Results.: </strong>The study revealed that 53.98% completed the two safety culture assessments, with 60.1% adherence from the nursing team, with a statistically significant difference in the second assessment regarding perception of patient safety and adverse events notified (p < 0.00). Regarding good practice indicators, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.00) was observed in item 43 and improvement in almost all dimensions in the second safety culture assessment. The huddles totaled 105 days, with 100% adherence from the nursing team. Regarding checklist items, all presented satisfactory responses (above 50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Safety huddles proved to be an effective tool for communication between healthcare professionals and managers, demonstrating positive impacts on good practice indicators and most safety culture dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"57 ","pages":"e20230270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10868519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0270en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify whether safety huddle implementation enabled a change in patient safety culture.

Method: Quasi-experimental research that assessed patient safety culture before and after safety huddle implementation.

Results.: The study revealed that 53.98% completed the two safety culture assessments, with 60.1% adherence from the nursing team, with a statistically significant difference in the second assessment regarding perception of patient safety and adverse events notified (p < 0.00). Regarding good practice indicators, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.00) was observed in item 43 and improvement in almost all dimensions in the second safety culture assessment. The huddles totaled 105 days, with 100% adherence from the nursing team. Regarding checklist items, all presented satisfactory responses (above 50%).

Conclusion: Safety huddles proved to be an effective tool for communication between healthcare professionals and managers, demonstrating positive impacts on good practice indicators and most safety culture dimensions.

实施 "安全分组 "前后的患者安全文化评估。
目的确定安全小组的实施是否能改变患者安全文化:方法:准实验研究,评估安全小组实施前后的患者安全文化:研究显示,53.98%的患者完成了两次安全文化评估,护理团队的坚持率为60.1%,第二次评估在患者安全感和不良事件通报方面的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.00)。在良好实践指标方面,第 43 项的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.00),而在第二次安全文化评估中,几乎所有方面都有所改善。分组讨论共计 105 天,护理团队 100%参加。在核对表项目中,所有项目的回答都令人满意(超过 50%):事实证明,安全小组是医护人员和管理人员之间进行沟通的有效工具,对良好实践指标和大多数安全文化维度产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信