Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Membrane Thickness and Sinus Health Following Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation: Comparing Preoperative Mucosal Thicknesses of < 5 mm and > 5 mm.

Kazem Khiabani, Farzaneh Nourbakhshian, Mohammad Hosein Amirzade-Iranaq
{"title":"Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Membrane Thickness and Sinus Health Following Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation: Comparing Preoperative Mucosal Thicknesses of < 5 mm and > 5 mm.","authors":"Kazem Khiabani, Farzaneh Nourbakhshian, Mohammad Hosein Amirzade-Iranaq","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) on sinus membrane (SM) thickness and sinus health in mucosa thickness < 5 mm and > 5 mm.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>LSFE was performed in a prospective controlled clinical trial on two groups with < 5 mm and > 5 mm SM thickness (Groups A and B, respectively) and followed for 6 months. Using preoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans and clinical evaluation, SM thickness changes (primary outcome variable), sinus health, augmented bone height and length (augmentation adequacy), membrane-related variables, and operation time were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty unilateral sinus augmentations (n = 20 for both groups) were performed on 40 subjects (72.5% men, mean age of 48.8 ± 7.6 years), and 52 implants were simultaneously placed. The mean preoperative and 6-month SM thicknesses were 1.4 ± 0.9 mm and 1.3 ± 0.6 mm in Group A, respectively, and were 6.8 ± 1.0 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm in Group B, respectively. The mean postoperative SM thickness significantly decreased (P < .001) only in Group B. The mean SM thickness changes also revealed a noticeable difference between the two groups (P < .001). Augmentation adequacy and membrane perforation rate were similar in both groups. Clinical and radiographic rhinosinusitis was not detected in any of the patients. Bleeding during separation and resistance to elevation were significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (P = .003, P = .001). Surgical time was longer in Group B (12.08 ± 8.26 minutes) than in Group A (8.64 ± 3.70 minutes), without reaching significance (P = .097).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSFE in thickened mucosa (< 10 mm) and thinner mucosa (< 5 mm) does not cause abnormal changes in the SM and sinus health. LSFE in thickened mucosa results in adequate sinus augmentation. The thickened membrane does not appear to be a contraindication to LSFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"867-874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE) on sinus membrane (SM) thickness and sinus health in mucosa thickness < 5 mm and > 5 mm.

Materials and methods: LSFE was performed in a prospective controlled clinical trial on two groups with < 5 mm and > 5 mm SM thickness (Groups A and B, respectively) and followed for 6 months. Using preoperative and 6-month postoperative CBCT scans and clinical evaluation, SM thickness changes (primary outcome variable), sinus health, augmented bone height and length (augmentation adequacy), membrane-related variables, and operation time were measured.

Results: Forty unilateral sinus augmentations (n = 20 for both groups) were performed on 40 subjects (72.5% men, mean age of 48.8 ± 7.6 years), and 52 implants were simultaneously placed. The mean preoperative and 6-month SM thicknesses were 1.4 ± 0.9 mm and 1.3 ± 0.6 mm in Group A, respectively, and were 6.8 ± 1.0 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm in Group B, respectively. The mean postoperative SM thickness significantly decreased (P < .001) only in Group B. The mean SM thickness changes also revealed a noticeable difference between the two groups (P < .001). Augmentation adequacy and membrane perforation rate were similar in both groups. Clinical and radiographic rhinosinusitis was not detected in any of the patients. Bleeding during separation and resistance to elevation were significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (P = .003, P = .001). Surgical time was longer in Group B (12.08 ± 8.26 minutes) than in Group A (8.64 ± 3.70 minutes), without reaching significance (P = .097).

Conclusions: LSFE in thickened mucosa (< 10 mm) and thinner mucosa (< 5 mm) does not cause abnormal changes in the SM and sinus health. LSFE in thickened mucosa results in adequate sinus augmentation. The thickened membrane does not appear to be a contraindication to LSFE.

上颌窦底侧方抬高术后上颌窦膜厚度和上颌窦健康的变化:术前粘膜厚度小于和大于 5 毫米的比较。
目的:研究侧向窦底抬高术(LSFE)对粘膜厚度小于和大于 5 毫米的窦膜(SM)厚度和窦健康的影响:在一项前瞻性对照临床试验中,对粘膜厚度小于和大于 5 毫米的两组患者(A 组和 B 组)进行了 LSFE,并随访 6 个月。通过术前和术后 6 个月的 CBCT 和临床评估,测量了 SM 厚度变化(主要结果变量)、鼻窦健康、增量骨高度和长度(增量充分性)、膜相关变量和手术时间:对 40 名受试者(72.5% 为男性,平均年龄为 48.8±7.6)进行了 40 次单侧鼻窦增量手术(A:20、B:20),同时安装了 52 个固定装置。A 组和 B 组术前和术后 6 个月的平均 SM 厚度分别为 1.4±0.9 毫米和 1.3±0.6 毫米,以及 6.8±1.0 毫米和 3.4±1.7 毫米。术后平均 SM 厚度明显降低(PConclusions:粘膜增厚(≤10 mm)和粘膜变薄(≤5 mm)的 LSFE 不会导致窦膜和窦健康发生异常变化。在粘膜增厚的情况下,LSFE 可以实现适当的窦增量。增厚的 SM 也显示出明显的厚度减少。增厚的黏膜似乎并不是 SFE 的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信