Laser vision correction after radial keratotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nima Koosha, Mir-Siamak Riazi, Parisa Janfaza, Iman Mohammadbeigy, Alireza Rahimi, Mehri Khoshali, Mohsen Pourazizi, Alireza Peyman
{"title":"Laser vision correction after radial keratotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nima Koosha, Mir-Siamak Riazi, Parisa Janfaza, Iman Mohammadbeigy, Alireza Rahimi, Mehri Khoshali, Mohsen Pourazizi, Alireza Peyman","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laser vision correction for residual refractive errors in patients with previous radial keratotomy (RK) presents a challenging task. Different techniques have been used with varying outcomes. This study aimed to systematically review published articles on refractive surgeries in post-RK patients by conducting a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The final analysis included 35 studies that described a total of 888 eyes. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), topography-guided PRK, wavefront-guided PRK, and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) while mechanical microkeratome LASIK did not yield such significant improvements. Moreover, our results suggest that post-RK patients with hyperopia had a significant improvement in UDVA, whereas no such improvement was observed in patients with myopia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"767-776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001426","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser vision correction for residual refractive errors in patients with previous radial keratotomy (RK) presents a challenging task. Different techniques have been used with varying outcomes. This study aimed to systematically review published articles on refractive surgeries in post-RK patients by conducting a search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The final analysis included 35 studies that described a total of 888 eyes. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) for photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), topography-guided PRK, wavefront-guided PRK, and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) while mechanical microkeratome LASIK did not yield such significant improvements. Moreover, our results suggest that post-RK patients with hyperopia had a significant improvement in UDVA, whereas no such improvement was observed in patients with myopia.

角膜切开术后的激光视力矫正:系统综述与 Meta 分析。
激光矫正曾接受过放射状角膜切开术(RK)的患者的残余屈光不正是一项具有挑战性的任务。人们采用了不同的技术,结果也各不相同。本研究旨在系统回顾在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上搜索到的有关 RK 术后患者屈光手术的已发表手稿。最终分析包括 35 项研究,共描述了 888 只眼睛。我们的系统综述和荟萃分析表明,光屈光性角膜切除术、地形图引导的角膜屈光手术(PRK)、波前引导的角膜屈光手术(PRK)和飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)可显著提高未矫正远视力(UDVA),而机械微角膜切削术(LASIK)则无明显改善。此外,我们的研究结果表明,RK 术后远视患者的 UDVA 有明显改善,而近视患者则没有这种改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信