A novel ionospheric TEC mapping function with azimuth parameters and its application to the Chinese region

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xingliang Huo, Yuanliang Long, Haojie Liu, Yunbin Yuan, Qi Liu, Ying Li, Mingming Liu, Yanwen Liu, Weihong Sun
{"title":"A novel ionospheric TEC mapping function with azimuth parameters and its application to the Chinese region","authors":"Xingliang Huo, Yuanliang Long, Haojie Liu, Yunbin Yuan, Qi Liu, Ying Li, Mingming Liu, Yanwen Liu, Weihong Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01819-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ionospheric mapping function (MF) for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), a mutual projection method for the slant total electron content (STEC) and vertical total electron content, is one of the significant factors affecting the performance of ionospheric models. The commonly used MF assumes isotropic TEC variations and takes into account only the satellite elevation angle, which may result in significant ionospheric projection errors, especially at low elevation angles. Based on the single-layer model, we propose an additional azimuth parameter mapping function (APMF). The APMF was estimated and evaluated by the NeQuick model during the periods of January 2014 and January 2022 from the aspect of simulation and measured STEC during the periods of 2014 and 2022 from the aspect of actual measurements over China, respectively. Compared to the modified single-layer model mapping function (MSLM-MF), the experimental results indicate that (1) The APMF can significantly reduce the ionospheric projection error, and the fluctuation in errors with different azimuth angles is small. (2) According to the evaluation based on the NeQuick simulation during the TEC peak time, when the ionosphere is quite active, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute projection error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in January 2014 are reduced by 56.1% and 60.0%, respectively, and in January 2022, they are reduced by 67.7% and 65.2%, respectively. Similarly, the upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 54.7% and 67.5% in January 2014 and January 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) is improved by 47.0% in January 2014 and 58.3% in January 2022. (3) According to the evaluation based on the measured STEC from GNSS raw data during the TEC peak time, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute mapping error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in 2014 are reduced by 48.9% and 46.9%, respectively, while in 2022, they are reduced by 48.3% and 41.2%, respectively. The upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 41.8% and 35.2% in 2014 and 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of RMSE is improved by 44.6% in 2014 and 39.2% in 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01819-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ionospheric mapping function (MF) for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), a mutual projection method for the slant total electron content (STEC) and vertical total electron content, is one of the significant factors affecting the performance of ionospheric models. The commonly used MF assumes isotropic TEC variations and takes into account only the satellite elevation angle, which may result in significant ionospheric projection errors, especially at low elevation angles. Based on the single-layer model, we propose an additional azimuth parameter mapping function (APMF). The APMF was estimated and evaluated by the NeQuick model during the periods of January 2014 and January 2022 from the aspect of simulation and measured STEC during the periods of 2014 and 2022 from the aspect of actual measurements over China, respectively. Compared to the modified single-layer model mapping function (MSLM-MF), the experimental results indicate that (1) The APMF can significantly reduce the ionospheric projection error, and the fluctuation in errors with different azimuth angles is small. (2) According to the evaluation based on the NeQuick simulation during the TEC peak time, when the ionosphere is quite active, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute projection error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in January 2014 are reduced by 56.1% and 60.0%, respectively, and in January 2022, they are reduced by 67.7% and 65.2%, respectively. Similarly, the upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 54.7% and 67.5% in January 2014 and January 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) is improved by 47.0% in January 2014 and 58.3% in January 2022. (3) According to the evaluation based on the measured STEC from GNSS raw data during the TEC peak time, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute mapping error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in 2014 are reduced by 48.9% and 46.9%, respectively, while in 2022, they are reduced by 48.3% and 41.2%, respectively. The upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 41.8% and 35.2% in 2014 and 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of RMSE is improved by 44.6% in 2014 and 39.2% in 2022.

Abstract Image

带方位角参数的新型电离层 TEC 映射函数及其在中国地区的应用
全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的电离层映射函数(MF)是斜向电子总含量(STEC)和垂直电子总含量的相互投影方法,是影响电离层模型性能的重要因素之一。常用的相互投影法假定各向同性的 TEC 变化,并且只考虑卫星仰角,这可能会导致严重的电离层投影误差,特别是在低仰角时。在单层模型的基础上,我们提出了一个额外的方位角参数映射函数(APMF)。在 2014 年 1 月和 2022 年 1 月期间,NeQuick 模型分别从模拟和实测 STEC 的角度对 APMF 进行了估计和评估。与改进的单层模型映射函数(MSLM-MF)相比,实验结果表明:(1)APMF 能显著减小电离层投影误差,且误差随不同方位角的波动较小。(2)根据在电离层相当活跃的 TEC 峰值时段基于 NeQuick 仿真的评估,2014 年 1 月 APMF 相对于 MSLM-MF 的绝对投影误差方框图的上四分位数和下四分位数分别减少了 56.1%和 60.0%,2022 年 1 月分别减少了 67.7%和 65.2%。同样,2014 年 1 月和 2022 年 1 月方框图中的上须分别减少了 54.7% 和 67.5%;APMF 的均方根误差(RMSE)性能在 2014 年 1 月提高了 47.0%,在 2022 年 1 月提高了 58.3%。(3) 根据在 TEC 高峰时段从 GNSS 原始数据测得的 STEC 评估,2014 年 APMF 相对于 MSLM-MF 的绝对映射误差方框图的上四分位数和下四分位数分别减少了 48.9% 和 46.9%,2022 年则分别减少了 48.3% 和 41.2%。方框图中的上须在 2014 年和 2022 年分别减少了 41.8% 和 35.2%;就 RMSE 而言,APMF 的性能在 2014 年提高了 44.6%,在 2022 年提高了 39.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信