Impacts of biostimulants on crop yield and biological activity under drought conditions

Jenendra Wadduwage, Eleonora Egidi, Brajesh K. Singh, Catriona A. Macdonald
{"title":"Impacts of biostimulants on crop yield and biological activity under drought conditions","authors":"Jenendra Wadduwage,&nbsp;Eleonora Egidi,&nbsp;Brajesh K. Singh,&nbsp;Catriona A. Macdonald","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Biostimulants are proposed to have a role in sustainable food production and are being increasingly used strategies to limit the negative effects of drought stress on crop yield and soil health. However, how different biostimulants used alone, or in combination with conventional management approaches affect soil health and crop yield under drought in different soils is not well understood. Here we conducted a glasshouse experiment to investigate this.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two soil types from fields maintained under intensive (IM) and extensive (EM) management practices were used with two commercial biostimulants [Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP)] on soil microbial populations and crop yield (lettuce) under well-watered and drought stressed conditions. We examined the activity and biomass of soil microorganisms as well as seed germination and root and shoot biomass to examine the effect of application of biostimulants on parameters of soil health and crop yield.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Biostimulants generally increased crop yield, basal soil respiration and microbial biomass, with effects stronger in EM soils than in IM soils, but effects on soil enzyme activities were variable. The combined use of biostimulant and inorganic fertiliser negated the benefits of the biostimulant on soil biological properties in some cases. Nevertheless, effects of biostimulants had a positive impact on crop yield with the combined use of soil-applied and seed applied biostimulants have the greatest impact on plant biomass and also conferring some resistance in both soil microbial communities and plant growth to drought.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While biomass and activity of the microbial community and plant growth responses to biostimulant additions are both soil and biostimulant dependent, their combined use has potential to aid both plants and maintain promote microbial activity under of drought, compared to conventional fertiliser treatments in extensively managed soils.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Biostimulants are proposed to have a role in sustainable food production and are being increasingly used strategies to limit the negative effects of drought stress on crop yield and soil health. However, how different biostimulants used alone, or in combination with conventional management approaches affect soil health and crop yield under drought in different soils is not well understood. Here we conducted a glasshouse experiment to investigate this.

Materials and Methods

Two soil types from fields maintained under intensive (IM) and extensive (EM) management practices were used with two commercial biostimulants [Universal Natural Plant food (UNP) and Converte Seed Primer (CSP)] on soil microbial populations and crop yield (lettuce) under well-watered and drought stressed conditions. We examined the activity and biomass of soil microorganisms as well as seed germination and root and shoot biomass to examine the effect of application of biostimulants on parameters of soil health and crop yield.

Results

Biostimulants generally increased crop yield, basal soil respiration and microbial biomass, with effects stronger in EM soils than in IM soils, but effects on soil enzyme activities were variable. The combined use of biostimulant and inorganic fertiliser negated the benefits of the biostimulant on soil biological properties in some cases. Nevertheless, effects of biostimulants had a positive impact on crop yield with the combined use of soil-applied and seed applied biostimulants have the greatest impact on plant biomass and also conferring some resistance in both soil microbial communities and plant growth to drought.

Conclusions

While biomass and activity of the microbial community and plant growth responses to biostimulant additions are both soil and biostimulant dependent, their combined use has potential to aid both plants and maintain promote microbial activity under of drought, compared to conventional fertiliser treatments in extensively managed soils.

Abstract Image

干旱条件下生物刺激素对作物产量和生物活性的影响
引言 生物刺激素被认为可在可持续粮食生产中发挥作用,并被越来越多地用于限制干旱胁迫对作物产量和土壤健康的负面影响。然而,人们对不同生物刺激剂单独使用或与传统管理方法结合使用如何影响不同土壤中的土壤健康和作物产量还不甚了解。在此,我们进行了一项温室实验来研究这一问题。 材料与方法 两种土壤类型分别来自采用密集型(IM)和广泛型(EM)管理方法的田地,在浇水充足和干旱胁迫条件下,两种商业生物刺激剂(通用天然植物食品(UNP)和 Converte Seed Primer(CSP))对土壤微生物种群和作物产量(莴苣)产生了影响。我们检测了土壤微生物的活性和生物量以及种子发芽率、根和芽的生物量,以研究施用生物刺激剂对土壤健康参数和作物产量的影响。 结果 生物刺激素普遍提高了作物产量、土壤基础呼吸作用和微生物生物量,在 EM 土壤中的效果强于 IM 土壤,但对土壤酶活性的影响则不尽相同。在某些情况下,生物刺激剂和无机肥料的联合使用抵消了生物刺激剂对土壤生物特性的益处。不过,生物刺激剂对作物产量有积极影响,土壤施用生物刺激剂和种子施用生物刺激剂的联合使用对植物生物量的影响最大,还能使土壤微生物群落和植物生长对干旱产生一定的抵抗力。 结论 虽然微生物群落的生物量和活性以及植物生长对添加生物刺激剂的反应都取决于土壤和生物刺激剂,但在广泛管理的土壤中,与传统肥料处理相比,联合使用生物刺激剂有可能在干旱条件下帮助植物和维持促进微生物的活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信