Improving Anticoagulation Care for Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-02-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000720
Vilmarie Rodriguez, Brockton S Mitchell, Joseph Stanek, Katherine Vasko, Jean Giver, Kay Monda, Joan Canini, Amy A Dunn, Riten Kumar
{"title":"Improving Anticoagulation Care for Pediatric Oncology Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Vilmarie Rodriguez, Brockton S Mitchell, Joseph Stanek, Katherine Vasko, Jean Giver, Kay Monda, Joan Canini, Amy A Dunn, Riten Kumar","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer is associated with increased venous thromboembolism in children. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in this cohort include using central venous catheters, mass effect from underlying malignancy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Anticoagulation management in this cohort is challenging, given recurrent episodes of thrombocytopenia, the need for invasive procedures, and coagulopathy. A quality improvement (QI) initiative was developed to improve hematology consultation services and provide documentation of an individualized anticoagulation care plan for this high-risk cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through the use of QI methods, interviews of stakeholders, expert consensus, and review of baseline data, a multidisciplinary team was organized, and key drivers relevant to improving access to hematology consultations and documentation of individualized anticoagulation care plans were identified. We used a Plan-Do-Study-Act model to improve hematology consultations and documentation of anticoagulation care plan (process measure). Outcome measures were bleeding and thrombosis recurrence/progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients with oncologic and venous thromboembolism diagnoses were included as baseline data. Slightly over half of these patients [53% (n = 9)] had a hematology consultation, and 7 (43.8%) had documentation of an anticoagulation care plan. After implementing QI methods, all 34 patients (100%) received hematology consultations and documentation of an anticoagulation care plan, and this measure was sustained for 1 year. Bleeding and thrombosis rates were similar in the baseline and post-QI cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QI interventions proved effective in sustaining access to hematology consultations and providing anticoagulation care plans for patients with concomitant improved anticoagulation plan documentation for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10857656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer is associated with increased venous thromboembolism in children. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in this cohort include using central venous catheters, mass effect from underlying malignancy, chemotherapy, and surgery. Anticoagulation management in this cohort is challenging, given recurrent episodes of thrombocytopenia, the need for invasive procedures, and coagulopathy. A quality improvement (QI) initiative was developed to improve hematology consultation services and provide documentation of an individualized anticoagulation care plan for this high-risk cohort.

Methods: Through the use of QI methods, interviews of stakeholders, expert consensus, and review of baseline data, a multidisciplinary team was organized, and key drivers relevant to improving access to hematology consultations and documentation of individualized anticoagulation care plans were identified. We used a Plan-Do-Study-Act model to improve hematology consultations and documentation of anticoagulation care plan (process measure). Outcome measures were bleeding and thrombosis recurrence/progression.

Results: Seventeen patients with oncologic and venous thromboembolism diagnoses were included as baseline data. Slightly over half of these patients [53% (n = 9)] had a hematology consultation, and 7 (43.8%) had documentation of an anticoagulation care plan. After implementing QI methods, all 34 patients (100%) received hematology consultations and documentation of an anticoagulation care plan, and this measure was sustained for 1 year. Bleeding and thrombosis rates were similar in the baseline and post-QI cohorts.

Conclusions: QI interventions proved effective in sustaining access to hematology consultations and providing anticoagulation care plans for patients with concomitant improved anticoagulation plan documentation for patients.

改善儿科肿瘤患者的抗凝治疗:质量改进计划。
背景:癌症与儿童静脉血栓栓塞症的增加有关。该群体发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险因素包括使用中心静脉导管、潜在恶性肿瘤的肿块效应、化疗和手术。考虑到血小板减少症的反复发作、侵入性手术的需要以及凝血功能障碍,该群体的抗凝管理具有挑战性。我们制定了一项质量改进(QI)计划,以改善血液学咨询服务,并为这一高风险人群提供个性化抗凝护理计划文件:方法:通过使用质量改进(QI)方法、采访利益相关者、专家共识和审查基线数据,我们组织了一个多学科团队,并确定了与改善血液学咨询服务和记录个性化抗凝护理计划相关的关键驱动因素。我们采用了 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "模式来改善血液科会诊和抗凝护理计划的记录(过程测量)。结果指标为出血和血栓复发/恶化:基线数据包括 17 名确诊为肿瘤和静脉血栓栓塞症的患者。其中略高于一半的患者[53%(n = 9)]接受过血液科会诊,7 名患者(43.8%)记录了抗凝护理计划。实施 QI 方法后,所有 34 名患者(100%)都接受了血液科会诊,并记录了抗凝护理计划,而且这项措施持续了 1 年。基线群组和实施 QI 后群组的出血率和血栓形成率相似:事实证明,QI 干预措施能有效维持患者获得血液科会诊并提供抗凝护理计划,同时改善患者的抗凝计划记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信