Safety and feasibility of transbronchial microwave ablation for subpleural lung nodules.

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/02184923241228323
Aliss Tsz Ching Chang, Joyce Wing Yan Chan, Ivan Chi Hin Siu, Rainbow Wing Hung Lau, Calvin Sze Hang Ng
{"title":"Safety and feasibility of transbronchial microwave ablation for subpleural lung nodules.","authors":"Aliss Tsz Ching Chang, Joyce Wing Yan Chan, Ivan Chi Hin Siu, Rainbow Wing Hung Lau, Calvin Sze Hang Ng","doi":"10.1177/02184923241228323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transbronchial microwave ablation in treating lung nodules is gaining popularity. However, microwave ablation in subpleural lung nodules raised concerns about pleural-based complications due to the proximity between the pleura and the ablation zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent transbronchial microwave ablation between March 2019 and November 2022 were included in this analysis. The lung nodules were categorized into the subpleural group-less than 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface; the deep nodule group-larger or equal to 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface. A review of the safety profile of subpleural lung nodule ablation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two lung nodules (<i>n</i> = 82) from 77 patients were treated. The mean nodule size was 14.2 ± 5.50 mm. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean procedural time was 133 min. No statistically significant differences were detected in the complication rate and the length of stay between the subpleural and deep nodule groups. Complications occured in 21 nodules (25.6%). No minor pneumothorax was reported. Total five cases of pneumothorax required drainage were observed (6.06% in subpleural nodules [<i>n</i> = 2] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [<i>n</i> = 3], <i>p</i> = 0.991). Total seven cases of pleuritic chest pain were observed (12.1% in subpleural nodules [<i>n</i> = 4] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [<i>n</i> = 3], <i>p</i> = 0.340).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This single-center retrospective analysis found no significant difference in the safety outcomes between subpleural and nonsubpleural lung nodule ablation. The overall rate of complications was low in the cohort. This demonstrated that transbronchial microwave was feasible and safe for most lung nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":35950,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923241228323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transbronchial microwave ablation in treating lung nodules is gaining popularity. However, microwave ablation in subpleural lung nodules raised concerns about pleural-based complications due to the proximity between the pleura and the ablation zone.

Methods: Patients who underwent transbronchial microwave ablation between March 2019 and November 2022 were included in this analysis. The lung nodules were categorized into the subpleural group-less than 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface; the deep nodule group-larger or equal to 5 mm distance to the nearest pleural surface. A review of the safety profile of subpleural lung nodule ablation was conducted.

Results: Eighty-two lung nodules (n = 82) from 77 patients were treated. The mean nodule size was 14.2 ± 5.50 mm. The technical success rate was 100%. The mean procedural time was 133 min. No statistically significant differences were detected in the complication rate and the length of stay between the subpleural and deep nodule groups. Complications occured in 21 nodules (25.6%). No minor pneumothorax was reported. Total five cases of pneumothorax required drainage were observed (6.06% in subpleural nodules [n = 2] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.991). Total seven cases of pleuritic chest pain were observed (12.1% in subpleural nodules [n = 4] vs. 6.12% in deep nodules [n = 3], p = 0.340).

Conclusions: This single-center retrospective analysis found no significant difference in the safety outcomes between subpleural and nonsubpleural lung nodule ablation. The overall rate of complications was low in the cohort. This demonstrated that transbronchial microwave was feasible and safe for most lung nodules.

经支气管微波消融治疗胸膜下肺结节的安全性和可行性。
背景:经支气管微波消融治疗肺结节越来越受欢迎。然而,胸膜下肺结节的微波消融术因胸膜与消融区之间的距离较近,引起了人们对胸膜并发症的担忧:本分析纳入了在 2019 年 3 月至 2022 年 11 月期间接受经支气管微波消融术的患者。肺部结节被分为胸膜下结节组--与最近胸膜表面的距离小于5毫米;深部结节组--与最近胸膜表面的距离大于或等于5毫米。对胸膜下肺结节消融术的安全性进行了审查:77名患者的82个肺结节(n = 82)接受了治疗。结节的平均大小为 14.2 ± 5.50 毫米。技术成功率为 100%。平均手术时间为 133 分钟。胸膜下结节组和深部结节组的并发症发生率和住院时间在统计学上没有明显差异。21个结节(25.6%)出现了并发症。没有轻微气胸的报告。共观察到五例需要引流的气胸(胸膜下结节为 6.06% [n = 2] ,深部结节为 6.12% [n = 3],p = 0.991)。共观察到 7 例胸膜炎性胸痛(胸膜下结节为 12.1%[n=4],深部结节为 6.12%[n=3],P=0.340):这项单中心回顾性分析发现,胸膜下肺结节消融术和非胸膜下肺结节消融术的安全性没有明显差异。队列中的总体并发症发生率较低。这表明经支气管微波对大多数肺结节是可行和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals is an international peer-reviewed journal pertaining to cardiovascular and thoracic medicine. Besides original clinical manuscripts, we welcome research reports, product reviews, reports of new techniques, and findings of special significance to Asia and the Pacific Rim. Case studies that have significant novel original observations, are instructive, include adequate methodological details and provide conclusions. Workshop proceedings, meetings and book reviews, letters to the editor, and meeting announcements are encouraged along with relevant articles from authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信