Polymerization shrinkage stress of contemporary dental composites: Comparison of two measurement methods.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dental materials journal Pub Date : 2024-03-29 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.4012/dmj.2023-192
Agata Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Sufyan Garoushi, Pekka Vallittu, Kinga Bociong, Lippo Lassila
{"title":"Polymerization shrinkage stress of contemporary dental composites: Comparison of two measurement methods.","authors":"Agata Szczesio-Wlodarczyk, Sufyan Garoushi, Pekka Vallittu, Kinga Bociong, Lippo Lassila","doi":"10.4012/dmj.2023-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare two testing methodologies employed for assessing the polymerization shrinkage stress of dental resin composites. Ten commercial resin composites were investigated (EverX Posterior & Flow; G-ænial Anterior, Posterior, A'CHORD & Universal Injectable; Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative; SDR flow+ and Aura Bulk Fill). Photoelastic and contraction forces measurement methods were performed. The slope of the linear trendline and C-factor of specimens were calculated. The shrinkage stress values (range between: 6.4-13.4 MPa) obtained by the photoelastic method were higher for all resin composites than the values obtained by contraction forces measurements (range between 1.2-4.8 MPa). However, there was a strong linear correlation between these methods (r=0.8). The use of both investigated methods revealed important information about the shrinkage behavior of the restorative resin composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11065,"journal":{"name":"Dental materials journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental materials journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2023-192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two testing methodologies employed for assessing the polymerization shrinkage stress of dental resin composites. Ten commercial resin composites were investigated (EverX Posterior & Flow; G-ænial Anterior, Posterior, A'CHORD & Universal Injectable; Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative; SDR flow+ and Aura Bulk Fill). Photoelastic and contraction forces measurement methods were performed. The slope of the linear trendline and C-factor of specimens were calculated. The shrinkage stress values (range between: 6.4-13.4 MPa) obtained by the photoelastic method were higher for all resin composites than the values obtained by contraction forces measurements (range between 1.2-4.8 MPa). However, there was a strong linear correlation between these methods (r=0.8). The use of both investigated methods revealed important information about the shrinkage behavior of the restorative resin composites.

当代牙科复合材料的聚合收缩应力:两种测量方法的比较
这项研究的目的是比较用于评估牙科树脂复合材料聚合收缩应力的两种测试方法。研究了十种商用树脂复合材料(EverX Posterior & Flow;G-ænial Anterior、Posterior、A'CHORD & Universal Injectable;Filtek One Bulk Fill & Universal Restorative;SDR flow+ 和 Aura Bulk Fill)。采用光弹性和收缩力测量方法。计算了试样的线性趋势线斜率和 C 因子。对所有树脂复合材料而言,光弹性方法获得的收缩应力值(范围在 6.4-13.4 兆帕之间)均高于收缩力测量法获得的收缩应力值(范围在 1.2-4.8 兆帕之间)。不过,这两种方法之间存在很强的线性相关(r=0.8)。这两种研究方法都揭示了修复树脂复合材料收缩行为的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental materials journal
Dental materials journal 医学-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dental Materials Journal is a peer review journal published by the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devises aiming to introduce the progress of the basic and applied sciences in dental materials and biomaterials. The dental materials-related clinical science and instrumental technologies are also within the scope of this journal. The materials dealt include synthetic polymers, ceramics, metals and tissue-derived biomaterials. Forefront dental materials and biomaterials used in developing filed, such as tissue engineering, bioengineering and artificial intelligence, are positively considered for the review as well. Recent acceptance rate of the submitted manuscript in the journal is around 30%.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信