Invalid spheroidal geopotential approximation and non-decomposable centrifugal acceleration from gravity – Reply to: Comments on “Horizontal gravity disturbance vector in atmospheric dynamics” by Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, McWilliams

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Peter C. Chu
{"title":"Invalid spheroidal geopotential approximation and non-decomposable centrifugal acceleration from gravity – Reply to: Comments on “Horizontal gravity disturbance vector in atmospheric dynamics” by Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, McWilliams","authors":"Peter C. Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, and McWilliams commented on my recent work regarding the horizontal gravity disturbance vector in atmospheric and oceanic dynamics. Their comments are incorrect. They ignored the horizontal pressure gradient error, claimed the validity of the spheroidal geopotential approximation subjectively based only on small metric error, and decomposed gravity into gravitational and centrifugal accelerations, which should never have been done. Here, I explain further why the spheroidal geopotential approximation is invalid and why gravity cannot be decomposed into gravitational and centrifugal accelerations in atmospheric and oceanic dynamics. Physically, the horizontal gravity disturbance vector vanishes in the horizontal momentum equation using the true gravity <strong>g</strong><sub><em>t</em></sub> in the true geopotential coordinates but does occur in the horizontal momentum equation using the true gravity <strong>g</strong><sub><em>t</em></sub> in the spheroidal geopotential coordinates due to the horizontal pressure gradient error in the coordinate transformation. <em>The error of horizontal pressure gradient force in transforming true geopotential to spheroidal geopotential coordinates equals to the horizontal gravity disturbance vector</em>. The spheroidal geopotential approximation claimed by Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, and McWilliams is <em><strong>invalid</strong></em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50563,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 101450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377026524000186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, and McWilliams commented on my recent work regarding the horizontal gravity disturbance vector in atmospheric and oceanic dynamics. Their comments are incorrect. They ignored the horizontal pressure gradient error, claimed the validity of the spheroidal geopotential approximation subjectively based only on small metric error, and decomposed gravity into gravitational and centrifugal accelerations, which should never have been done. Here, I explain further why the spheroidal geopotential approximation is invalid and why gravity cannot be decomposed into gravitational and centrifugal accelerations in atmospheric and oceanic dynamics. Physically, the horizontal gravity disturbance vector vanishes in the horizontal momentum equation using the true gravity gt in the true geopotential coordinates but does occur in the horizontal momentum equation using the true gravity gt in the spheroidal geopotential coordinates due to the horizontal pressure gradient error in the coordinate transformation. The error of horizontal pressure gradient force in transforming true geopotential to spheroidal geopotential coordinates equals to the horizontal gravity disturbance vector. The spheroidal geopotential approximation claimed by Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, and McWilliams is invalid.

无效的球状位势近似和不可分解的重力离心加速度--答复:Chang, Wolfe, Stewart, McWilliams 对 "大气动力学中的水平重力扰动矢量 "的评论
Chang、Wolfe、Stewart 和 McWilliams 对我最近关于大气和海洋动力学中水平重力扰动矢量的研究发表了评论。他们的评论是错误的。他们忽略了水平压力梯度误差,仅根据微小的度量误差就主观地声称球面位势近似的有效性,并将重力分解为重力加速度和离心加速度,这是不应该的。在此,我进一步解释为什么球面位势近似无效,为什么在大气和海洋动力学中不能将重力分解为重力加速度和离心加速度。从物理学角度讲,在使用真实位势坐标中的真实重力 gt 的水平动量方程中,水平重力扰动矢量消失了,但在使用球面位势坐标中的真实重力 gt 的水平动量方程中,由于坐标变换中的水平压力梯度误差,水平重力扰动矢量确实出现了。将真实位势坐标转换为球面位势坐标时的水平压力梯度力误差等于水平重力扰动矢量。Chang、Wolfe、Stewart 和 McWilliams 声称的球面位势近似是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans is an international journal for research related to the dynamical and physical processes governing atmospheres, oceans and climate. Authors are invited to submit articles, short contributions or scholarly reviews in the following areas: •Dynamic meteorology •Physical oceanography •Geophysical fluid dynamics •Climate variability and climate change •Atmosphere-ocean-biosphere-cryosphere interactions •Prediction and predictability •Scale interactions Papers of theoretical, computational, experimental and observational investigations are invited, particularly those that explore the fundamental nature - or bring together the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary aspects - of dynamical and physical processes at all scales. Papers that explore air-sea interactions and the coupling between atmospheres, oceans, and other components of the climate system are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信