Evaluation of an HPV vaccine toolkit to improve OB/GYN discussion of HPV vaccination

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah Simko , Teodocia Maria Hayes-Bautista , Erica Givens
{"title":"Evaluation of an HPV vaccine toolkit to improve OB/GYN discussion of HPV vaccination","authors":"Sarah Simko ,&nbsp;Teodocia Maria Hayes-Bautista ,&nbsp;Erica Givens","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccination is a safe, effective method to prevent HPV-associated disease. Racial-ethnic disparities in HPV vaccination exist, which could lead to widening gaps in cervical cancer mortality. Provider discussion of HPV vaccination has been shown to be a primary factor for increasing vaccination rates. The objective of this study is to assess provider discussion of HPV vaccination pre and post implementation of an intervention, named the HPV Vaccine Toolkit, in an Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) clinic in Boyle Heights, Los Angeles.</p></div><div><h3>Study design and methods</h3><p>This quality improvement study occurred over four cycles of development. Its design was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. The toolkit components included dot phrases (pre-written phrases to speed documentation), educational posters, electronic health record prompts, HPV vaccine referral guides, and educational sessions. Chart audits and pre- and post-providers surveys were performed between 2019 and 2021 to assess for an increase in provider discussion of the HPV vaccine, as well as to evaluate the various components of the toolkit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Provider discussion increased over the four cycles of this intervention, with HPV vaccination discussion documented in 15 % of patients in 2019, 19 % of patients in 2020 and 47 % of patients in 2021. Gaps identified included limited discussion of vaccination at postpartum visits. Provider uncertainty of where to refer patients for the HPV vaccine decreased following the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Discussion of HPV vaccination is an important preventative strategy that can be overlooked in OB/GYN clinics. Implementation of multicomponent strategies can increase provider discussion of HPV vaccination status, although barriers to discussion remain. Improved counseling on HPV vaccination could have significant impacts on reducing HPV-related disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000107/pdfft?md5=35131f4ea6c275304e8491d6834ed1c6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000107-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccination is a safe, effective method to prevent HPV-associated disease. Racial-ethnic disparities in HPV vaccination exist, which could lead to widening gaps in cervical cancer mortality. Provider discussion of HPV vaccination has been shown to be a primary factor for increasing vaccination rates. The objective of this study is to assess provider discussion of HPV vaccination pre and post implementation of an intervention, named the HPV Vaccine Toolkit, in an Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) clinic in Boyle Heights, Los Angeles.

Study design and methods

This quality improvement study occurred over four cycles of development. Its design was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. The toolkit components included dot phrases (pre-written phrases to speed documentation), educational posters, electronic health record prompts, HPV vaccine referral guides, and educational sessions. Chart audits and pre- and post-providers surveys were performed between 2019 and 2021 to assess for an increase in provider discussion of the HPV vaccine, as well as to evaluate the various components of the toolkit.

Results

Provider discussion increased over the four cycles of this intervention, with HPV vaccination discussion documented in 15 % of patients in 2019, 19 % of patients in 2020 and 47 % of patients in 2021. Gaps identified included limited discussion of vaccination at postpartum visits. Provider uncertainty of where to refer patients for the HPV vaccine decreased following the intervention.

Conclusion

Discussion of HPV vaccination is an important preventative strategy that can be overlooked in OB/GYN clinics. Implementation of multicomponent strategies can increase provider discussion of HPV vaccination status, although barriers to discussion remain. Improved counseling on HPV vaccination could have significant impacts on reducing HPV-related disease.

评估 HPV 疫苗工具包,以改进妇产科医生对 HPV 疫苗接种的讨论
背景HPV(人乳头瘤病毒)疫苗接种是预防 HPV 相关疾病的一种安全有效的方法。在接种 HPV 疫苗方面存在种族和民族差异,这可能会导致宫颈癌死亡率的差距不断扩大。事实证明,医生对 HPV 疫苗接种的讨论是提高疫苗接种率的主要因素。本研究的目的是评估洛杉矶博伊尔高地一家妇产科(OB/GYN)诊所在实施名为 "HPV 疫苗工具包 "的干预措施前后提供者对 HPV 疫苗接种的讨论情况。其设计以计划行为理论为指导。工具包的组成部分包括点式短语(预先写好的短语,可加快记录速度)、教育海报、电子健康记录提示、HPV 疫苗转诊指南和教育课程。在 2019 年至 2021 年期间,对病历进行了审核,并对医疗服务提供者进行了前后调查,以评估医疗服务提供者对 HPV 疫苗讨论的增加情况,并对工具包的各个组成部分进行评估。结果 在该干预措施的四个周期内,医疗服务提供者的讨论有所增加,2019 年有 15% 的患者记录了 HPV 疫苗接种讨论,2020 年有 19% 的患者记录了讨论,2021 年有 47% 的患者记录了讨论。发现的差距包括产后就诊时对疫苗接种的讨论有限。干预措施实施后,医疗服务提供者对转诊患者接种 HPV 疫苗的不确定性有所降低。多成分策略的实施可以增加医疗服务提供者对 HPV 疫苗接种情况的讨论,尽管讨论的障碍依然存在。改进 HPV 疫苗接种咨询可对减少 HPV 相关疾病产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信