Ambiguous personhood: Paradoxes of social belonging in Danish nursing home care

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Emma Jelstrup Balkin , Ingjerd Gåre Kymre , Mette Geil Kollerup , Bente Martinsen , Mette Grønkjær
{"title":"Ambiguous personhood: Paradoxes of social belonging in Danish nursing home care","authors":"Emma Jelstrup Balkin ,&nbsp;Ingjerd Gåre Kymre ,&nbsp;Mette Geil Kollerup ,&nbsp;Bente Martinsen ,&nbsp;Mette Grønkjær","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In oldest old age (generally considered to be from 85 years onwards), personhood is often called into question, impacting well-being as a result. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this article examines the well-being of oldest old nursing home residents at the intersections of ageism, fraying personhood and fragile social belonging in Danish nursing home care. In Denmark personhood hinges on both independence and social belonging; or “fællesskab.” We examine how these concepts are practiced in nursing home care. Taking its starting point in the distinction between the “inside world” of the nursing home and the “real world” outside, the article examines how processes of othering occur in nursing home care, imperilling resident personhood and opportunities for social belonging. We consider how oldest old residents navigate social belonging, finding it in turn life-sustaining and vexatious. We argue that tacit ageism permeates the nursing home, to the detriment of resident well-being, despite the best intentions of an aged care system that is structured to specifically maintain personhood.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000094/pdfft?md5=4688957d464e1944bf803054d75e5ab5&pid=1-s2.0-S0890406524000094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In oldest old age (generally considered to be from 85 years onwards), personhood is often called into question, impacting well-being as a result. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this article examines the well-being of oldest old nursing home residents at the intersections of ageism, fraying personhood and fragile social belonging in Danish nursing home care. In Denmark personhood hinges on both independence and social belonging; or “fællesskab.” We examine how these concepts are practiced in nursing home care. Taking its starting point in the distinction between the “inside world” of the nursing home and the “real world” outside, the article examines how processes of othering occur in nursing home care, imperilling resident personhood and opportunities for social belonging. We consider how oldest old residents navigate social belonging, finding it in turn life-sustaining and vexatious. We argue that tacit ageism permeates the nursing home, to the detriment of resident well-being, despite the best intentions of an aged care system that is structured to specifically maintain personhood.

模糊的人格:丹麦养老院护理中的社会归属悖论
在耄耋之年(一般认为是 85 岁以上),人格常常受到质疑,从而影响到幸福感。本文以人种学实地调查为基础,从丹麦养老院护理中的年龄歧视、脆弱的人格和脆弱的社会归属感这三个交叉点出发,探讨了养老院高龄老人的幸福感问题。在丹麦,人格取决于独立性和社会归属感(或称 "fællesskab")。我们将研究这些概念在养老院护理中是如何实践的。文章以养老院 "内部世界 "和外部 "真实世界 "之间的区别为出发点,探讨了他者化过程如何在养老院护理中发生,从而危及居民的人格和社会归属机会。我们探讨了最年长的住院者如何驾驭社会归属感,发现它既能维持生命,又令人烦恼。我们认为,尽管养老护理系统的结构设计是为了专门维护老年人的人格,但养老院中弥漫着不言而喻的老龄歧视,损害了居民的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信