Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort

IF 6.3 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Roberta Gagliardini , Andrea Giacomelli , Giorgio Bozzi , Antonella D'Arminio Monforte , Alessandro Tavelli , Valentina Mazzotta , Elena Bruzzesi , Adriana Cervo , Annalisa Saracino , Cristina Mussini , Enrico Girardi , Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri , Andrea Antinori , ICONA Foundation study group
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on retention in care of native and migrant people with HIV in the ICONA cohort","authors":"Roberta Gagliardini ,&nbsp;Andrea Giacomelli ,&nbsp;Giorgio Bozzi ,&nbsp;Antonella D'Arminio Monforte ,&nbsp;Alessandro Tavelli ,&nbsp;Valentina Mazzotta ,&nbsp;Elena Bruzzesi ,&nbsp;Adriana Cervo ,&nbsp;Annalisa Saracino ,&nbsp;Cristina Mussini ,&nbsp;Enrico Girardi ,&nbsp;Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri ,&nbsp;Andrea Antinori ,&nbsp;ICONA Foundation study group","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2024.102691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.</p><p>Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.</p><p>After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 102691"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X/pdfft?md5=a8a01699f4e0c31b54be371f1f9c09d1&pid=1-s2.0-S147789392400005X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392400005X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

COVID-19 pandemic challenged the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. How the COVID-19 pandemic affected HIV retention in care and whether it has disproportionally affected migrant people with HIV (PWH) remained to be investigated.

Methods

PWH in ICONA Cohort in follow-up in each of the study periods were included: 01/09/2019-29/02/2020 (pandemic period) and 01/03/2018-31/08/2018 (historical period, as a control). Risk of temporary loss to follow-up (LTFU, defined as no data recorded for a person for one year) was analyzed by logistic regression, with migrant status as the main exposure variable. Difference in difference (DID) analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 pandemic in the different risk of LTFU between natives and migrants.

Results

8864 (17.1% migrants) and 8071 (16.8% migrants) PWH constituted the pandemic and the historical period population, respectively.

Proportion of PWH defined as LTFU in the pandemic period was 10.5% in native and 19.6% in migrant PWH.

After controlling for age, sex and geographical location of enrolling site, risk of temporary LTFU was higher for migrants than native PWH [adjusted odds ratio 1.85 (95%CI 1.54–2.22)] in pandemic period. In PWH contributing to both periods, LTFU was 9.0% (95% CI 8.3–9.8) in natives vs 17.0% (95% CI 14.7–19.4) in migrants during the pandemic. Instead, LTFU was 1.2% (95%CI 0.9, 1.5) in natives vs 2.2% (95% CI 1.3–3.1) in migrants during the historical period, with a resulting DID of 7.0% (95% CI 4.4–9.6).

Conclusions

A greater proportion of LTFU in migrant PWH was observed in both periods, which remained unaltered over time. Interventions to reduce LTFU of migrants are necessary.

COVID-19 大流行对 ICONA 队列中本地和移民艾滋病毒感染者继续接受护理的影响。
背景:COVID-19 大流行对联合国艾滋病规划署的 90-90-90 目标提出了挑战。COVID-19大流行如何影响艾滋病患者继续接受护理,以及它是否对感染艾滋病毒的移民(PWH)产生了不成比例的影响,仍有待研究:方法:纳入在每个研究期间接受随访的 ICONA 队列中的 PWH:方法:纳入 ICONA 队列中在每个研究期间接受随访的感染者:01/09/2019-29/02/2020(大流行期)和 01/03/2018-31/08/2018(历史期,作为对照)。以移民身份为主要暴露变量,通过逻辑回归分析了暂时失去随访的风险(LTFU,定义为一年内无数据记录)。采用差异分析(DID)评估 COVID-19 大流行对本地人和移民之间不同的 LTFU 风险的影响:大流行和历史时期的人群中分别有 8864 名(17.1% 的移民)和 8071 名(16.8% 的移民)残疾人。在大流行时期,被定义为 "LTFU "的威迫症患者比例在本地威迫症患者中为 10.5%,在移民威迫症患者中为 19.6%。在控制了年龄、性别和登记地点的地理位置后,在大流行时期,外来务工人员发生暂时性LTFU的风险高于本地务工人员[调整后的几率比为1.85(95%CI为1.54-2.22)]。在大流行期间,在两个时期均有贡献的公共卫生人员中,本地人的 LTFU 为 9.0%(95% CI 8.3-9.8),而移民为 17.0%(95% CI 14.7-19.4)。相反,在历史时期,本地人的LTFU为1.2%(95%CI 0.9,1.5),而移民为2.2%(95%CI 1.3-3.1),因此DID为7.0%(95%CI 4.4-9.6):结论:在这两个时期均观察到移民威利斯人的LTFU比例较高,且随着时间的推移未发生变化。有必要采取干预措施以减少移民的LTFU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信