A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5

P Khadatkar, B Niranjan, A Bansal, S Sundaramurthy, K Choudhary, P Sijeria

{"title":"A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.","authors":"P Khadatkar, B Niranjan, A Bansal, S Sundaramurthy, K Choudhary, P Sijeria","doi":"10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-chargeability in conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (type II), Pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N-an in vitro study at an interval of first, fourteenth, and twenty first days.Methods: Three groups of test materials, each with twenty samples, were prepared. Measurements of the cumulative fluoride release [parts per million (ppm)] and re-release measured on the first, fourteenth, and twenty first days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means for different readings, and Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to compare each group with each other.Results: Initial and subsequent fluoride release of Cention-N at days one, fourteen, and twenty-one were all noticeably higher than those of conventional and pediatric GIC.Conclusion: Compared to the Conventional and Pediatric GIC restorative materials, Cention-N was more effective in the initial and fluoride re-release.","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-chargeability in conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (type II), Pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N-an in vitro study at an interval of first, fourteenth, and twenty first days.

Methods: Three groups of test materials, each with twenty samples, were prepared. Measurements of the cumulative fluoride release [parts per million (ppm)] and re-release measured on the first, fourteenth, and twenty first days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means for different readings, and Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to compare each group with each other.

Results: Initial and subsequent fluoride release of Cention-N at days one, fourteen, and twenty-one were all noticeably higher than those of conventional and pediatric GIC.

Conclusion: Compared to the Conventional and Pediatric GIC restorative materials, Cention-N was more effective in the initial and fluoride re-release.

查看原文本刊更多论文

传统 GIC（II 型）、儿科 GIC（IX 型）和 Cention-N 中氟化物释放和可再充电性的比较评估：体外研究。

目的：比较评估传统玻璃离子粘固剂（GIC）（II型）、小儿GIC（IX型）和Cention-N的氟释放和再充填性--一项间隔1天、14天和21天的体外研究：方法：准备了三组测试材料，每组 20 个样品。方法：准备三组测试材料，每组二十个样品，分别在第一天、第十四天和第二十一天测量累积氟释放量[百万分之一（ppm）]和再释放量。采用方差分析（ANOVA）比较不同读数的平均值，并采用 Tukey 后分析比较各组之间的差异：结果：Cention-N 在第 1 天、第 14 天和第 21 天的初始和后续氟释放量都明显高于传统和小儿 GIC：结论：与传统和小儿 GIC 修复材料相比，Cention-N 在初始和氟再释放方面更有效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.