Breakdowns and repairs: Communication initiation and effectiveness in infants with and without an older sibling with autism

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Samantha Plate , Jana M. Iverson
{"title":"Breakdowns and repairs: Communication initiation and effectiveness in infants with and without an older sibling with autism","authors":"Samantha Plate ,&nbsp;Jana M. Iverson","doi":"10.1016/j.infbeh.2024.101924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Infants initiate interactions to get their wants and needs met; but sometimes they are not effective in their communication and are misunderstood by caregivers. When this happens, they must recognize this breakdown in communication and attempt repairs. Experimental literature suggests that in neurotypically developing infants these skills develop during the first two years. However, little work has investigated communication breakdowns and repairs in populations of infants with known social communication difficulties (e.g., infants with an elevated likelihood for autism). Here we explored early social communication initiations, breakdowns, and repair strategies in naturalistic videos of 18-month-old infants (<em>N</em> = 64) with elevated likelihood (EL) for autism and other developmental delays (<em>N</em> = 49) and infants with population-level likelihood for autism (e.g., typical likelihood, TL, <em>N</em> = 15). EL infants, including those who later met criteria for autism (EL-AUT), initiated with caregivers, experienced breakdowns, and made repairs at similar rates to TL infants. However, the types of behaviors used differed, such that EL infants appeared to have a relative strength in making behavior regulation bids. EL-AUT infants used a large proportion of developmentally appropriate repair behaviors (i.e., addition and substitution), even though their repertoires of repair strategies were smaller. Additionally, EL-AUT infants produced a larger proportion of simplification repairs, which are less developmentally advanced and less helpful to interlocutors. Identifying patterns in how EL infants communicate with caregivers and capitalizing on their strengths could improve interventions focused on social communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48222,"journal":{"name":"Infant Behavior & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Behavior & Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163638324000031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants initiate interactions to get their wants and needs met; but sometimes they are not effective in their communication and are misunderstood by caregivers. When this happens, they must recognize this breakdown in communication and attempt repairs. Experimental literature suggests that in neurotypically developing infants these skills develop during the first two years. However, little work has investigated communication breakdowns and repairs in populations of infants with known social communication difficulties (e.g., infants with an elevated likelihood for autism). Here we explored early social communication initiations, breakdowns, and repair strategies in naturalistic videos of 18-month-old infants (N = 64) with elevated likelihood (EL) for autism and other developmental delays (N = 49) and infants with population-level likelihood for autism (e.g., typical likelihood, TL, N = 15). EL infants, including those who later met criteria for autism (EL-AUT), initiated with caregivers, experienced breakdowns, and made repairs at similar rates to TL infants. However, the types of behaviors used differed, such that EL infants appeared to have a relative strength in making behavior regulation bids. EL-AUT infants used a large proportion of developmentally appropriate repair behaviors (i.e., addition and substitution), even though their repertoires of repair strategies were smaller. Additionally, EL-AUT infants produced a larger proportion of simplification repairs, which are less developmentally advanced and less helpful to interlocutors. Identifying patterns in how EL infants communicate with caregivers and capitalizing on their strengths could improve interventions focused on social communication.

破损与修复:有或没有患有自闭症的哥哥姐姐的婴儿的沟通启动和有效性
婴儿会主动与人交流,以满足自己的愿望和需要;但有时他们的交流并不有效,会被照护者误解。当这种情况发生时,他们必须认识到这种沟通障碍并尝试修复。实验文献表明,神经发育正常的婴儿在头两年就会发展出这些技能。然而,很少有研究对已知有社交沟通障碍的婴儿(如自闭症可能性较高的婴儿)的沟通中断和修复进行调查。在此,我们通过自然视频探讨了 18 个月大的自闭症和其他发育迟缓可能性增高(EL)婴儿(64 个)(49 个)和人群自闭症可能性(如典型可能性,TL,15 个)婴儿的早期社交沟通启动、中断和修复策略。EL 婴儿(包括后来符合自闭症标准的婴儿(EL-AUT))与 TL 婴儿一样,会主动与照顾者沟通、经历崩溃并进行修复。然而,所使用的行为类型却有所不同,因此 EL 婴儿在进行行为调节方面似乎相对更有优势。尽管 EL-AUT 婴儿的修复策略范围较小,但他们使用了很大比例的适合其发展的修复行为(即添加和替换)。此外,EL-AUT 婴儿的简化修复行为所占比例较大,而简化修复行为在发育上并不先进,对对话者的帮助也较小。找出 EL 婴儿与照顾者沟通的模式并利用他们的优势,可以改善以社会沟通为重点的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Behavior & Development
Infant Behavior & Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Infant Behavior & Development publishes empirical (fundamental and clinical), theoretical, methodological and review papers. Brief reports dealing with behavioral development during infancy (up to 3 years) will also be considered. Papers of an inter- and multidisciplinary nature, for example neuroscience, non-linear dynamics and modelling approaches, are particularly encouraged. Areas covered by the journal include cognitive development, emotional development, perception, perception-action coupling, motor development and socialisation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信