Effects of kinesiotaping during early post-operative rehabilitation in individuals who underwent a total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1177/02692155241230894
Edmund C Ickert, David Griswold, Omar Ross, Shannon Dudash, Colleen Duchon, Ken Learman
{"title":"Effects of kinesiotaping during early post-operative rehabilitation in individuals who underwent a total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.","authors":"Edmund C Ickert, David Griswold, Omar Ross, Shannon Dudash, Colleen Duchon, Ken Learman","doi":"10.1177/02692155241230894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the treatment effects of early use kinesiotaping on pain, range of motion, mobility, and edema outcomes following total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, SPORTDiscus, Biosis Citation Index, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for potential randomized control trials from inception to 8 January 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Randomized control trials evaluating the effect of kinesiotaping published in English were included. Reference lists for relevant reviews were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven articles totaling 534 participants were included for meta-analysis. Kinesiotaping with standard rehabilitation when compared to standard rehabilitation alone had very low certainty of evidence in pain and knee flexion range of motion. Kinesiotaping was favored at post-operative days two to four for pain (<i>P</i> = 0.03, standard mean difference = -0.77 [-1.45, -0.09]) and range of motion (<i>P</i> = 0.002, standard mean difference = -0.24 [-0.44, -0.03]). Kinesiotaping was favored at post-operative days six to eight for pain (<i>P</i> = 0.02, standard mean difference = -0.76 [-1.41, -0.12]) and range of motion (<i>P</i> = 0.04, standard mean difference = -0.63 [-1.22, -0.04]). Edema and mobility could not be meta-analyzed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of kinesiotaping early in post-operative rehabilitation could be a useful modality for reducing pain and increasing the range of knee flexion, however, the certainty of evidence is very low.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"732-748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241230894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To report the treatment effects of early use kinesiotaping on pain, range of motion, mobility, and edema outcomes following total knee arthroplasty.

Data sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, SPORTDiscus, Biosis Citation Index, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for potential randomized control trials from inception to 8 January 2024.

Review methods: Randomized control trials evaluating the effect of kinesiotaping published in English were included. Reference lists for relevant reviews were searched. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results: Seven articles totaling 534 participants were included for meta-analysis. Kinesiotaping with standard rehabilitation when compared to standard rehabilitation alone had very low certainty of evidence in pain and knee flexion range of motion. Kinesiotaping was favored at post-operative days two to four for pain (P = 0.03, standard mean difference = -0.77 [-1.45, -0.09]) and range of motion (P = 0.002, standard mean difference = -0.24 [-0.44, -0.03]). Kinesiotaping was favored at post-operative days six to eight for pain (P = 0.02, standard mean difference = -0.76 [-1.41, -0.12]) and range of motion (P = 0.04, standard mean difference = -0.63 [-1.22, -0.04]). Edema and mobility could not be meta-analyzed.

Conclusion: The use of kinesiotaping early in post-operative rehabilitation could be a useful modality for reducing pain and increasing the range of knee flexion, however, the certainty of evidence is very low.

全膝关节置换术后早期康复训练中运动塑形的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的报告早期使用运动塑形术对全膝关节置换术后疼痛、活动范围、活动度和水肿的治疗效果:数据来源:检索了 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、PubMED、SPORTDiscus、Biosis Citation Index 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature,以查找从开始到 2024 年 1 月 8 日期间可能存在的随机对照试验:综述方法:纳入以英文发表的、评估运动塑形效果的随机对照试验。检索了相关综述的参考文献列表。使用 Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 工具评估研究质量。采用 "建议分级评估、发展和评价 "方法确定证据的确定性:共有 7 篇文章、534 名参与者被纳入荟萃分析。在疼痛和膝关节屈曲活动范围方面,运动康复训练与标准康复训练相比,证据确定性非常低。在术后第 2 至 4 天,运动塑形对疼痛(P = 0.03,标准平均差 = -0.77 [-1.45, -0.09])和活动范围(P = 0.002,标准平均差 = -0.24 [-0.44, -0.03])更有利。在术后第六至第八天,运动塑形对疼痛(P = 0.02,标准均值差 = -0.76 [-1.41, -0.12])和活动范围(P = 0.04,标准均值差 = -0.63 [-1.22, -0.04])更有利。水肿和活动度无法进行荟萃分析:结论:在术后康复早期使用运动塑形可以有效减轻疼痛并增加膝关节屈曲范围,但证据的确定性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信