Additional Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy with Lidocaine Injection on Clinical and MRI Findings in Frozen Shoulder: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9
Gopal Nambi, Mshari Alghadier, Mudathir Mohamedahmed Eltayeb, Osama R Aldhafian, Ayman K Saleh, Nesreen Alsanousi, Mohamed Nagah Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdehamid A Attallah, Mohammed Abdelgwad Ismail, Mohamed Elfeshawy, Yaser El Sayed Hasan Wahd, Alaa Jameel A Albarakati
{"title":"Additional Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy with Lidocaine Injection on Clinical and MRI Findings in Frozen Shoulder: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Gopal Nambi, Mshari Alghadier, Mudathir Mohamedahmed Eltayeb, Osama R Aldhafian, Ayman K Saleh, Nesreen Alsanousi, Mohamed Nagah Ahmed Ibrahim, Abdehamid A Attallah, Mohammed Abdelgwad Ismail, Mohamed Elfeshawy, Yaser El Sayed Hasan Wahd, Alaa Jameel A Albarakati","doi":"10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Frozen shoulder is a very common musculoskeletal condition and the evidence related to the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in individuals with frozen shoulder is rare. Therefore, this study aims to compare and investigate the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in a frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty eligible participants with frozen shoulder were included and the active group (n = 30, age 52.12 ± 5.2 years) received a lidocaine injection (1% lidocaine (Xylocaine) and 2cc (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate) with active ESWT (3.5 bar air pressure and 2000 pulses with an energy flux density (EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm<sup>2</sup>) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. The placebo group (n = 30, age 53.56 ± 5.5 years) received lidocaine injection with placebo treatment (a special head that blocked the shock waves) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. Both groups received progressive resistance exercises (PRE) to the shoulder muscles. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analogue scale. The other outcome measures were the thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abduction, and lateral rotation range of motion (ROM), functional disability, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention at 4 weeks showed an improvement of 2.0 (CI 95% 1.71-2.28) in the active group compared to the placebo group. Similar effects were noted after 8 weeks (2.2) (CI 95% 1.91-2.48) and at the 6-month (1.9) (CI 95% 1.61-2.18) follow-up. Similar improvements were also found in the thickness of the CHL ligament (0.6) (CI 95% 0.46-0.73), abduction and lateral rotation (ROM) (- 23.6) (CI 95% - 27.47 to -19.72), (- 18.10) (CI 95% - 19.72 to - 16.47), functional disability (16.2) (CI 95% 14.85-17.54), kinesiophobia (11.0 (CI 95% 10.21-11.98), depression status (4.4) (CI 95% 4.03-4.76) and quality of life (0.9) (CI 95% 0.79-1.00) (p = 0.001) at the 6-month follow-up period, where mean estimates and their confidence intervals all included worthwhile effects. There were no adverse reactions or side effects noted in either the active or placebo groups during and after the treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concluded that the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy after intra-articular lidocaine injection improves pain, functional disability, range of motion, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life in people with frozen shoulder.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>https://ctri.nic.in , identifier; CTRI/2020/04/024834 prospectively registered on 24/04/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"251-268"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00575-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Frozen shoulder is a very common musculoskeletal condition and the evidence related to the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in individuals with frozen shoulder is rare. Therefore, this study aims to compare and investigate the additional effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) with intra-articular (IA) lidocaine injection in a frozen shoulder.

Methods: Sixty eligible participants with frozen shoulder were included and the active group (n = 30, age 52.12 ± 5.2 years) received a lidocaine injection (1% lidocaine (Xylocaine) and 2cc (80 mg) methylprednisolone acetate) with active ESWT (3.5 bar air pressure and 2000 pulses with an energy flux density (EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm2) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. The placebo group (n = 30, age 53.56 ± 5.5 years) received lidocaine injection with placebo treatment (a special head that blocked the shock waves) three sessions a week for 4 weeks. Both groups received progressive resistance exercises (PRE) to the shoulder muscles. The primary outcome was pain intensity, measured with the visual analogue scale. The other outcome measures were the thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abduction, and lateral rotation range of motion (ROM), functional disability, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and at 6-month follow-up.

Results: The post-intervention at 4 weeks showed an improvement of 2.0 (CI 95% 1.71-2.28) in the active group compared to the placebo group. Similar effects were noted after 8 weeks (2.2) (CI 95% 1.91-2.48) and at the 6-month (1.9) (CI 95% 1.61-2.18) follow-up. Similar improvements were also found in the thickness of the CHL ligament (0.6) (CI 95% 0.46-0.73), abduction and lateral rotation (ROM) (- 23.6) (CI 95% - 27.47 to -19.72), (- 18.10) (CI 95% - 19.72 to - 16.47), functional disability (16.2) (CI 95% 14.85-17.54), kinesiophobia (11.0 (CI 95% 10.21-11.98), depression status (4.4) (CI 95% 4.03-4.76) and quality of life (0.9) (CI 95% 0.79-1.00) (p = 0.001) at the 6-month follow-up period, where mean estimates and their confidence intervals all included worthwhile effects. There were no adverse reactions or side effects noted in either the active or placebo groups during and after the treatment.

Conclusions: The study concluded that the addition of extracorporeal shockwave therapy after intra-articular lidocaine injection improves pain, functional disability, range of motion, kinesiophobia, depression status, and quality of life in people with frozen shoulder.

Trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in , identifier; CTRI/2020/04/024834 prospectively registered on 24/04/2020.

Abstract Image

体外冲击波疗法联合利多卡因注射对肩周炎临床和核磁共振成像结果的额外影响:前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
简介:肩周炎是一种非常常见的肌肉骨骼疾病:肩周炎是一种非常常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,但有关体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与关节内利多卡因注射对肩周炎患者的额外效果的证据却很少见。因此,本研究旨在比较和调查体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)与关节内注射利多卡因对肩周炎患者的额外效果:60名符合条件的肩周炎患者被纳入其中,积极治疗组(n = 30,年龄为52.12 ± 5.2岁)接受利多卡因注射(1%利多卡因(Xylocaine)和2cc(80 mg)醋酸甲泼尼龙),并接受积极ESWT治疗(3.5巴气压和2000次脉冲,能量通量密度(EFD) ¼ 0.16 mJ/mm2),每周三次,持续4周。安慰剂组(n = 30,年龄为 53.56 ± 5.5 岁)接受利多卡因注射和安慰剂治疗(阻断冲击波的特殊头),每周三次,持续 4 周。两组患者均接受肩部肌肉渐进阻力训练(PRE)。主要结果是疼痛强度,用视觉模拟量表测量。其他结果指标包括通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量的肱冠韧带(CHL)厚度、外展和侧转活动范围(ROM)、功能障碍、运动恐惧症、抑郁状况和生活质量。在基线、4 周后、8 周后和 6 个月的随访中对参与者进行了评估:干预后 4 周的结果显示,与安慰剂组相比,积极干预组的疗效提高了 2.0(CI 95% 1.71-2.28)。8 周后(2.2)(CI 95% 1.91-2.48)和 6 个月随访时(1.9)(CI 95% 1.61-2.18)也有类似效果。在 CHL 韧带厚度(0.6)(CI 95% 0.46-0.73)、外展和侧旋(ROM)(- 23.6)(CI 95% - 27.47 至 -19.72)、(- 18.10)(CI 95% - 19.72 至 -16.47)、功能性残疾(16.2)(CI 95% 14.85-17.54)、运动障碍恐惧症(1.9)(CI 95% 1.61-2.18)方面也发现了类似的改善。54)、运动恐惧(11.0(CI 95% 10.21-11.98)、抑郁状态(4.4)(CI 95% 4.03-4.76)和生活质量(0.9)(CI 95% 0.79-1.00)(P = 0.001),随访 6 个月,平均估计值及其置信区间均包括值得效应。在治疗期间和治疗后,活性组和安慰剂组均未发现不良反应或副作用:该研究认为,在关节内注射利多卡因后加用体外冲击波疗法可改善肩周炎患者的疼痛、功能障碍、活动范围、运动恐惧症、抑郁状态和生活质量。试验注册:https://ctri.nic.in ,标识符;CTRI/2020/04/024834,2020年4月24日进行了前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信