Low-Intensity Wildfire Alters Selected Soil Properties in the Tropical Shorea robusta Forest

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Badri Prasad Dhungana, Vivek Thapa Chhetri, C. Baniya, Sundar Prasad Sharma
{"title":"Low-Intensity Wildfire Alters Selected Soil Properties in the Tropical Shorea robusta Forest","authors":"Badri Prasad Dhungana, Vivek Thapa Chhetri, C. Baniya, Sundar Prasad Sharma","doi":"10.1155/2024/4686760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wildfires may impact specific soil properties differently, including positive, negative, or neutral effects. However, due to the absence of uniformity in comprehending how wildfires influence soil nutrients, this research endeavors to scrutinize the particular effect of wildfire on selected soil properties in the tropical Shorea robusta forest. We analyzed 42 soil samples obtained from the topsoil of 0–10 cm comprising 21 samples from the fire-affected area and 21 from the fire-unaffected area. The physicochemical parameters of the soil including soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus, and available potassium were examined and compared in two sites. The impact of fire was statistically tested after comparing each variable between the two sites. Using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Pearson correlation coefficient, we analyzed the data. The results indicated that the average chemical parameters of the soil except for pH in the fire-affected area (pH = 5.43, SOC = 1.6%, TN = 0.1%, and P=246.85 kg·ha−1) were greater than those in the fire-unaffected area (pH = 5.71, SOC = 1.21%, TN = 0.09%, and P=174.21 kg·ha−1). There were statistically significant differences in the soil parameters, including pH, SOC, TN, and P, but not with K. The soil pH was reduced in the fire-affected area, with a significant positive correlation with SOC, TN, and K. Overall, the low-intensity wildfire facilitated the proliferation of soil chemical properties in the tropical S. robusta forest. Hence, low-intensity wildfire could be a suitable forest management strategy to alter soil nutrient status. Additionally, these findings can aid in enhancing forest fire management strategies for effectively managing the tropical S. robusta forest.","PeriodicalId":14099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forestry Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4686760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfires may impact specific soil properties differently, including positive, negative, or neutral effects. However, due to the absence of uniformity in comprehending how wildfires influence soil nutrients, this research endeavors to scrutinize the particular effect of wildfire on selected soil properties in the tropical Shorea robusta forest. We analyzed 42 soil samples obtained from the topsoil of 0–10 cm comprising 21 samples from the fire-affected area and 21 from the fire-unaffected area. The physicochemical parameters of the soil including soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus, and available potassium were examined and compared in two sites. The impact of fire was statistically tested after comparing each variable between the two sites. Using the Mann–Whitney U test and the Pearson correlation coefficient, we analyzed the data. The results indicated that the average chemical parameters of the soil except for pH in the fire-affected area (pH = 5.43, SOC = 1.6%, TN = 0.1%, and P=246.85 kg·ha−1) were greater than those in the fire-unaffected area (pH = 5.71, SOC = 1.21%, TN = 0.09%, and P=174.21 kg·ha−1). There were statistically significant differences in the soil parameters, including pH, SOC, TN, and P, but not with K. The soil pH was reduced in the fire-affected area, with a significant positive correlation with SOC, TN, and K. Overall, the low-intensity wildfire facilitated the proliferation of soil chemical properties in the tropical S. robusta forest. Hence, low-intensity wildfire could be a suitable forest management strategy to alter soil nutrient status. Additionally, these findings can aid in enhancing forest fire management strategies for effectively managing the tropical S. robusta forest.
低强度野火改变了热带娑罗双树林的部分土壤特性
野火可能会对特定的土壤性质产生不同的影响,包括正面、负面或中性影响。然而,由于在理解野火如何影响土壤养分方面缺乏统一性,本研究试图仔细研究野火对热带 Shorea robusta 森林中特定土壤性质的影响。我们分析了 42 份取自 0-10 厘米表土的土壤样本,其中 21 份来自受火灾影响的地区,21 份来自未受火灾影响的地区。我们考察并比较了两个地点的土壤理化参数,包括土壤 pH 值、土壤有机碳 (SOC)、全氮 (TN)、可利用磷和可利用钾。在对两个地点的每个变量进行比较后,对火灾的影响进行了统计检验。我们使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验和皮尔逊相关系数对数据进行了分析。结果表明,除 pH 值外,受火灾影响地区土壤的平均化学参数(pH = 5.43、SOC = 1.6%、TN = 0.1%、P=246.85 kg-ha-1)均高于未受火灾影响地区(pH = 5.71、SOC = 1.21%、TN = 0.09%、P=174.21 kg-ha-1)。受火灾影响地区的土壤 pH 值降低,与 SOC、TN 和 K 呈显著正相关。因此,低强度野火可能是改变土壤养分状况的一种合适的森林管理策略。此外,这些发现有助于加强森林火灾管理策略,从而有效管理热带 S. robusta 森林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Forestry Research
International Journal of Forestry Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Forestry Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on the management and conservation of trees or forests. The journal will consider articles looking at areas such as tree biodiversity, sustainability, and habitat protection, as well as social and economic aspects of forestry. Other topics covered include landscape protection, productive capacity, and forest health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信