Léa Leclerc, Eric Fakra, Baptiste Pignon, Amine Benyamina, Raphaël Gaillard, Benjamin Rolland
{"title":"Opinions of French psychiatrists on the regulatory status of cannabis: Results from the \"PsyCan - Encéphale\" national online survey.","authors":"Léa Leclerc, Eric Fakra, Baptiste Pignon, Amine Benyamina, Raphaël Gaillard, Benjamin Rolland","doi":"10.1016/j.encep.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the opinions of French psychiatrists toward the legalization of medical or recreational use of cannabis in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psycan was an anonymous Internet survey conducted between September 28, 2021 and March 29, 2022, among subscribers of the Encéphale Online community, i.e., approximately 4000 French psychiatrists. Participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire, collecting their socio-demographic features, clinical experience, opinions toward cannabis legalization, and perceived impact of cannabis derivatives for psychiatric disorders. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with being for or against cannabis legalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 413 psychiatrists answered the survey, of whom 253 (61.3%) declared being in favour of recreational cannabis, and 349 (84.4%) of medical cannabis. Being in favour of legalization of recreational cannabis was negatively associated with being female (odd ratio [OR]=0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.93), and with the frequency of meeting patients with cannabis use disorder (OR=0.60; 95%CI=0.43-0.83). Most respondents were concerned about the development of psychotic disorders. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments were improved prevention, better control of product content, and better protection of youth, respectively. Arguments against legalization were increased societal damages, increased impact on health, including mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A majority of French psychiatrists were in favour of the marketing of medical cannabis, and, to a lesser extent, the legalization of recreational cannabis. For recreational cannabis, the proportion of pro-legalization psychiatrists was slightly more elevated than that found in the French general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":51042,"journal":{"name":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encephale-Revue De Psychiatrie Clinique Biologique et Therapeutique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2023.11.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To explore the opinions of French psychiatrists toward the legalization of medical or recreational use of cannabis in France.
Methods: Psycan was an anonymous Internet survey conducted between September 28, 2021 and March 29, 2022, among subscribers of the Encéphale Online community, i.e., approximately 4000 French psychiatrists. Participants were asked to complete a structured questionnaire, collecting their socio-demographic features, clinical experience, opinions toward cannabis legalization, and perceived impact of cannabis derivatives for psychiatric disorders. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with being for or against cannabis legalization.
Results: In total, 413 psychiatrists answered the survey, of whom 253 (61.3%) declared being in favour of recreational cannabis, and 349 (84.4%) of medical cannabis. Being in favour of legalization of recreational cannabis was negatively associated with being female (odd ratio [OR]=0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.93), and with the frequency of meeting patients with cannabis use disorder (OR=0.60; 95%CI=0.43-0.83). Most respondents were concerned about the development of psychotic disorders. The most frequent pro-legalization arguments were improved prevention, better control of product content, and better protection of youth, respectively. Arguments against legalization were increased societal damages, increased impact on health, including mental health.
Conclusions: A majority of French psychiatrists were in favour of the marketing of medical cannabis, and, to a lesser extent, the legalization of recreational cannabis. For recreational cannabis, the proportion of pro-legalization psychiatrists was slightly more elevated than that found in the French general population.
期刊介绍:
Une revue française de renommée internationale.
- Un comite de rédaction représentant tous les aspects de la prise en charge psychiatrique du patient.
- Une sélection rigoureuse d''articles faisant l''objet de plusieurs expertises.
- Des travaux d''auteurs et de chercheurs de renommée internationale.
- Des indexations dans les grandes bases de données (Current Contents, Excerpta Medica, etc.).
- Un facteur d''impact qui témoigne de la grande notoriété de la revue.
La tribune des publications originales de haut niveau.
- Une très grande diversité des sujets traités, rigoureusement sélectionnés à travers des sommaires dynamiques :
- des éditoriaux de médecins référents,
- une revue de presse sur les actualités internationales,
- des articles originaux pour approfondir vos connaissances,
- des mises au point et des cas cliniques pour engager votre réflexion sur les indications et choix possibles au travers de mises en situation clinique,
- des dossiers thématiques pour faire le tour d''une question.
- L''actualité de l''AFPB : L''Encéphale publie régulièrement des comptes rendus de l''Association française de psychiatrie clinique.