The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative perfusion index as a predictor of postspinal anesthesia hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: A prospective non-blinded observational study.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_378_23
Manu P Kesavankutty, Chinmaya Panda, Habib M R Karim, Subrata Singha, Sarita Agrawal
{"title":"The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative perfusion index as a predictor of postspinal anesthesia hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: A prospective non-blinded observational study.","authors":"Manu P Kesavankutty, Chinmaya Panda, Habib M R Karim, Subrata Singha, Sarita Agrawal","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_378_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean section with a prominent side effect of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSH). This needs an early prediction to avoid feto-maternal complication. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion index (PI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) in the prediction of PSH.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) 1 and two undergoing cesarean delivery participated in the study. IVCCI, PI, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) were noted in the preoperative period. The fall of MBP by 20% from baseline or below 65 mm Hg was considered PSH. After spinal anesthesia, SBP, DBP, MBP, and HR were noted again for diagnosing PSH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It did not show any statistical difference when comparing the PI between the PSH and non-PSH groups in both the PSH definition groups. IVCCI was significantly higher when PSH was considered MBP <65 mm Hg (<i>P</i> = 0.01). However, IVCCI was found to be statistically insignificant if PSH was considered a 20% reduction in baseline MBP. The correlation matrix between IVCCI and PI showed Pearson's r-value of 0.525, indicating a substantial relationship between the two (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis had shown that neither IVCCI nor PI was a good predictor of PSH in parturients for both definition groups for PSH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is a modest correlation between PI and IVCCI, both cannot be used to predict postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing elective lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS).</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10833017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_378_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean section with a prominent side effect of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSH). This needs an early prediction to avoid feto-maternal complication. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion index (PI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) in the prediction of PSH.

Material and methods: Thirty parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) 1 and two undergoing cesarean delivery participated in the study. IVCCI, PI, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) were noted in the preoperative period. The fall of MBP by 20% from baseline or below 65 mm Hg was considered PSH. After spinal anesthesia, SBP, DBP, MBP, and HR were noted again for diagnosing PSH.

Results: It did not show any statistical difference when comparing the PI between the PSH and non-PSH groups in both the PSH definition groups. IVCCI was significantly higher when PSH was considered MBP <65 mm Hg (P = 0.01). However, IVCCI was found to be statistically insignificant if PSH was considered a 20% reduction in baseline MBP. The correlation matrix between IVCCI and PI showed Pearson's r-value of 0.525, indicating a substantial relationship between the two (P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis had shown that neither IVCCI nor PI was a good predictor of PSH in parturients for both definition groups for PSH.

Conclusion: Although there is a modest correlation between PI and IVCCI, both cannot be used to predict postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing elective lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS).

术前灌注指数作为剖宫产产妇椎管内麻醉后低血压预测指标的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性非盲观察研究。
背景和目的:椎管内麻醉是选择性剖宫产的首选技术,其突出的副作用是椎管内麻醉后低血压(PSH)。这需要及早预测,以避免胎儿-产妇并发症的发生。本研究旨在评估灌注指数(PI)和下腔静脉塌陷指数(IVCCI)在预测PSH方面的诊断准确性:30名美国麻醉医师协会体格状态(ASA-PS)1级和2级的剖宫产产妇参加了研究。术前记录了 IVCCI、PI、基线收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均血压(MBP)和心率(HR)。MBP 从基线下降 20% 或低于 65 mm Hg 即为 PSH。脊髓麻醉后,再次记录 SBP、DBP、MBP 和 HR 以诊断 PSH:在 PSH 定义的两个组别中,比较 PSH 组和非 PSH 组的 PI 没有发现任何统计学差异。当 PSH 被视为 MBP 时,IVCCI 明显更高(P=0.01)。然而,如果将 PSH 视为基线 MBP 降低 20%,则 IVCCI 在统计学上并不显著。IVCCI 和 PI 之间的相关矩阵显示,Pearson 的 r 值为 0.525,表明二者之间存在实质性关系(P = 0.003)。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,在 PSH 的两个定义组别中,IVCCI 和 PI 都不能很好地预测产妇的 PSH:结论:尽管 PI 和 IVCCI 之间存在一定的相关性,但两者都不能用于预测择期进行下段剖宫产术(LSCS)的产妇的椎管后低血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信